What's wrong with there being theists in the world? As long as they're not forcing you to join them, it's ok, right? ..Wrong.. This group is to share thoughts about the dangers of theism -- and through the discussion, to be armed to enlighten others.
Members: 103
Latest Activity: Apr 16
Started by Shane Starr. Last reply by Patricia Sep 10, 2012. 1 Reply 0 Likes
So I had a run in with one of those bible thumping "I'm going to save the world for jesus" types today in a restaurant and after much debate I decided to start a YouTube channel to vent some of my…Continue
Started by Noh Name. Last reply by Steph S. Jul 18, 2012. 6 Replies 0 Likes
I've tried not to be hostile towards theism, not that I think it is something to be tolerated or protected, but bc I once was a theist. I know that if an anti-theist like Hitchens would get going I…Continue
Started by Becoming Other. Last reply by Joan Denoo Apr 17, 2012. 3 Replies 1 Like
http://www.nospank.net/fyog19.htm#afterwordbecause people often cannot face the repressed pain in their own…Continue
Started by Becoming Other Feb 15, 2012. 0 Replies 0 Likes
Alice Millerhttp://www.nospank.net/fyog19.htm#afterword 10 Point Program for Social Justice 1. Public sector spending to create value…Continue
Comment
Comment by Joan Denoo on June 7, 2012 at 12:11pm anthropocentrism
1: a belief that homo sapiens are the most significant entity of the universe
2: attitudes, behaviors, customs, traditions and values that foster interpreting or regarding the world in terms of human experiences.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anthropocentric
sexism
1: a belief that gender is a primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that gender differences produce an inherent superiority of male gender over female; discrimination against women
2: attitudes, behaviors, customs, traditions and values that foster stereotypes of social roles based on gender.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism
racism
1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2: attitudes, behaviors, customs, traditions and values that foster racial prejudice or discrimination.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism
dominionism
1: a belief that a person or philosophy has the power to rule and control a country, region, people, resources, etc.
2: attitudes, behaviors, customs, traditions and values that claim the right to have power and control over others or things.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominionism
exceptionalism
1: A belief that a god or philosophy is unusual or uncommon and result in inherent superiority over others.
2: attitudes, behaviors, customs, traditions and values that foster superiority and the right to have dominion over others or things.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exceptionalism
theocentrism
1: A belief that a specific and particular god is the central interest and ultimate concern
2: attitudes, behaviors, customs, traditions and values that foster a specific and particular god.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theocentric
Comment by Joan Denoo on June 7, 2012 at 12:10pm Basic fallacies of religion are:
1. God created man in god’s image. - Anthropocentrism
2. God created man, male, in his male, god image. - Sexism
3. God created my race superior to your race. - Racism
4. God created man to have dominion over all that swims, crawls, flies. - Dominionism
5. God created man to worship the “one true god.” - Exceptionalism
6. God is sovereign – Theocentrism
7. God created man to obey - Theo-co-dependent
8. God created man be dependent, passive, and subordinate - Religious
Joan Denoo
Sunday, March 28, 2010 original
Thursday, June 7, 2012 revised
Comment by Alan Perlman on June 7, 2012 at 10:24am Patricia...some years ago my wife (maried to someone else) actually let a couple of Jehovah's Witnesses in -- and debated them for days, if not weeks. Neither side budged an inch. A couple of weeks ago, another cleanm-cut pair appeared at our door asking if we wanted to talk about the Bible. Unfortunately, we didn't have time, so all they got was my statement that "we're hard-core atheists here" and my wife shouting from another room that the Bible was a book of horrible, primitive fantasies and God a deranged sadist. Where does one start? Do I want to damage family relationships by belittling their superficial Judaism? From the other side, mistrust of atheists shows up in polls that show people more likely to vote for a woman, a gay person, a Jew -- almost anyone but an atheist -- for President. I think change has to come from the top, with an openly secular national figure -- a congressional leader or even the Prez. Hard to believe that nearly all politicians pay at least lip service to religion and dare not utter a word against it.
Comment by Patricia on June 6, 2012 at 9:05pm Yes Alan, we've been too busy 'minding our own business' & 'living & letting live', & frankly I'm tired of us being pretty much doormats so as not to rock the boat. I'm not educated but I blab when opportunity strikes because I'm past being polite. Just a few minutes ago we had mor(m)ons at the door, & my husband told them to screw off & leave him alone! I was raised mor(m)on & if I'd answered the door I would have had more to say about this being an atheist household & looking into reality would be a very good idea!
Comment by Alan Perlman on June 6, 2012 at 8:06pm Patricia,
As a PR person (speechwriting), I'm aware of the marketplace of ideas. Atheists are way too quiet. A bus ad or billboard here and there won't do it. For starters, how about every religion story on TV or in the news has a quote from an atheist organization stating that, scientifically speaking, the events being celebrated just didn't happen?
Comment by Patricia on June 6, 2012 at 4:49pm Alan,
I've been saying for years that religion will be the one to kill us all off, & we're politically correcting ourselves right into it! It's had way too much power for centuries & we seem to be handing ourselves over on a platinum platter!
Comment by Alan Perlman on June 6, 2012 at 1:20pm Religion is at the same time the benefactor of immense social approval and the cause of immeasurable misery. It is not enough to just be an atheist. We must actively oppose religion, its bigotries and other horrors, or it will, as Bill Maher suggests, be the end of us.
Comment by Joan Denoo on April 17, 2012 at 12:12pm Patricia that has been my experience as well: not bring up religion, but others start and I give my best reasoning. With some, it is easy for me to stay calm and even have a little fun with questions, like, "Do you really believe ...?" My dear cousin warns her husband not to bring up religion (he is "born again") and we are not together more than "Hello, how are you?" and he starts. He tries his very best. He then goes on a hunt for some pretty or different or unique bird house and the next time we are together he gives it to me, kind of a peace offering. And the cycle begins again. My back yard has many splendid bird houses. I enjoy our debates.
Comment by Joan Denoo on February 15, 2012 at 7:22pm Silence has never been a benefit for me. I am glad to know there are others who are able and willing to take a stand. Your technique is sound! I like having a reputation .... that cuts down on idiot talk.
Comment by Patricia on February 10, 2012 at 1:21pm For myself Joan, I agree! I am not a 'kind, tolerant, patient' person & never 'hid in a closet' or kept 'quiet' over not believing crap. I am not the one who brings the subject up, but if someone says something to me about their fairy-tale beliefs, I'll jump right in & tell them I don't buy it & it's best to keep 'that' subject off limits to avoid quarreling if nothing else.
Mr Peterdactyl replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Pope Francis says even Atheists go to Heaven
The Flying Atheist commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
The Flying Atheist replied to Loren Miller's discussion Latest Activity?
booklover replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds...
booklover commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
Loren Miller replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Oklahoma Tornado in the group Hang With Friends
Mathew T. replied to Alexandra's discussion Need help with irreducible complexity
The Flying Atheist replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Oklahoma Tornado in the group Hang With Friends© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.


You need to be a member of Anti-Theists to add comments!