http://frogirm.ca/evolution/letter.php

An open letter considering ignorance, misunderstanding, and the irrationality of teaching the "theory of evolution" and a formal request for removing the theory of evolution as a theory and replacing it with a "hypothesis of evolution.

My Dear Colleagues,

I am deeply concerned with the state of our educational system, especially existing scientific attitudes and beliefs as invoked in the "theory" of evolution. The theory of evolution does not rely on facts, as scientific theories always should, but on arguments resting on myths, falsehoods, and guesswork. It is really the evolution conjecture.

Although the theory of evolution aims at truth, it misses, and it is unclear what kind of truth the proponents of the theory of evolution consider, and if their interest is in harmony with the interest of satisfying the body of knowledge, and if it is propelled by the motivation to fulfil a higher good of scientific justice.

Indeed, it is rather hard to explain why the theory of evolution is being taught in schools since there is no proof for it. Deep questions arise about the impartial perspective and the interest of the teaching profession. Those who aspire to teach should have thought and should continue to think about the consequences of misguided education and what kinds of problems they inflict on young people and society. Today's education cannot be validated unless educators are able to rethink and adjust their practices to meet the demands of the changing morality of science and society at large, and separate facts from speculation.

A primary difficulty in the approach of separating facts from speculations is that the theory of evolution is taught in school as a theory, theory being a fact. There is a difference between a theory and a hypothesis. "There is a popular misconception that theories are nothing but hunches or unfounded explanations. But, in scientific terms, a theory is a statement of relationship that has a firm basis as demonstrated through testing and the accumulation of evidence." 1

It is not important how the theory of evolution is used, so long as this use is made clear. Therefore, I propose that we teach evolution not as theory but as a hypothesis. A hypothesis, contrary to a theory, indicates an assumption, an opinion, or a speculation. Since there is no hard scientific proof for evolution, a hypothesis of evolution does not necessarily have to be based on facts; in other words, a hypothesis of evolution is not required to be consistent with true descriptions of reality but rather a provisional idea whose merit needs evaluation.

Since the scope of education is to teach a body of knowledge, I propose we also teach the hypothesis of intelligent design and/or catasthropism in our schools. I propose that scholars who promote the hypothesis of evolution as theory do it with less egotistical competition and more respect for people who do not adhere to their belief system. In short, I propose we concentrate on what is ethical, not egotistical.

The purpose of education is to get to know different ideas without prejudice. A prejudiced belief such as the "theory of evolution" is usually held because it suits the interest of the believers. Evolution is not science because it cannot be tested, nor is it amenable to falsification; neither it is open to refutation.

It would be forthright for the Ministry of Education to replace the "theory of evolution" with a "hypothesis of evolution" as an important victory for the teaching of science in North American schools.

For more information on evolution as surmise, please consult my publication Obituary - Evolution 1859-2009.

1. Jurmain, Robert, Harry Nelson, Lynn Kilgore, Wenda Trevathan. Essentials of Physical Anthropology (2001). University textbook. Wadsworth Thomson Learning, page 14

Views: 27

Replies to This Discussion

This is a joke, right?
No, this person is dead serious, like all fundy creationists. She was my friend on MySpace. I had no idea she was like this, though, until she left this bullshit steaming on my Malevolent Design page there. I promptly got rid of her ass. Buh bye!
*cry*
Complete twaddle from an ignorant boob.
I doubt she even has a basic understanding of evolution.
I thought this was a spoof too. I am continually flabbergasted at the fundies in America and shake my head in wonderment at how such piffle can be considered acceptable. I'm a science teacher in the UK and evolution is intrinsic within the science curriculum, even within the religion lessons. Whilst the textbooks designed for student use, do refer to evolutionary theory, they make the point that whilst unable to prove evolution, it is the best theory to explain why were are the way we are.

If there is the same sort of interference taking place in the UK I haven't come across it. We still have faith schools and even in them the curriculum is the same. I was raised as a catholic and all my nieces and nephews attended catholic schools, and I teach in them from time to time. I can honestly say I have never come across evolution naysayers. No doubt they exist but maybe because of the British tradition for toeing the line, they don't voice their opinions too loudly for fear of the ridicule that will ensue.

I feel for you if you're an atheist in the States, you must all feel like you're surrounded by madness.
Can you post a link to " Obituary - Evolution 1859-2009.
It would be interesting to see what arguments she attempts to make against evolution. Is it the same twisted logic as the Discovery Institute, the lack of understanding, or complete ignoring of the facts. It just astounds me, and it shouldn't by now, but it does!! How blind, or willingly mislead people can be.
She said"there's no proof of evolution?" What about walruses with feet? or Human looking skeletons with chimp faces I think they named it lucy but many more have showed up. We got fossils, bones, and We can observe it in living creatures.
What has creationism got? I'm assuming she means christianity right? What evidence is there that adam was made from clay or eve from bones. NONE!
I think she's hoping we haven't done our research .

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

k.h. ky commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
5 minutes ago
Patricia commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
27 minutes ago
Soren Sagan commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
28 minutes ago
The Flying Atheist commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
55 minutes ago
The Flying Atheist commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
1 hour ago
Amy commented on Daniel W's group Godless in the garden
1 hour ago
Daniel W commented on Daniel W's group Godless in the garden
1 hour ago
Jim B posted a photo
1 hour ago
Loren Miller commented on Dyslexic's DOG's blog post Wendy Wright (Creationist) arguably the Dumbest Person I've Ever Seen on Youtube!
1 hour ago
Frank Moorman posted a status
"Heading to Las Vegas this weekend and hope to see the Tree of Knowledge, decorated with book covers, posted by the LV Coalition of Reason."
2 hours ago
Frank Moorman updated their profile
2 hours ago
Frank Moorman posted a status
"I signed up here four years ago, but did not participate, what with life taking some interesting turns. So I'll try again."
3 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service