Why religion is fundamentally and basically immoral and evil, and should be banned.

Like no other existing human enterprise, religion will one day lead its insane followers to start a nuclear war that will destroy us all over some insult to it or its deity or to the breaking of one of its commandments.
There is no comparable threat to our very existence from any other form of human activity.



Views: 23

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

And I would say a theist suicide bomber is also primarily a psychopath. In the clinical sense.
Granted. There are those who are coerced by various repugnant methods. But there are also the volunteer believers who are not pushed. The latter do have the main criterion for psychopathy - complete absence of empathy with the other.
I agree - all suicide bombers obviously think they are doing the 'right thing', but a religious bomber will genuinely be doing it 'for' (i.e. as a result of) his religion, and his actions will be in line with religious doctrine (otherwise the 'religious' part would after all be incidental); I can't imagine a similar motivation based on atheist thought (however one might attempt to define that...)
That's why i distinguished between 'all suicide bombers' and 'religious suicide bombers' (the current topic). That said, I suspect that religious attitudes have some part to play in many suicide bombings that might be classified as 'political', if only in the belief in, say, an afterlife or a conviction in absolute morals...
That is ingrained in them from an early age. The question is, what makes them cross that threshold from acting in theory to acting in practice.
I think the threshold can't really be predicted; each suicide bomber is forged by a wide variety of circumstances. The ingrained idea, religious belief, economic and social milieu, individual personality and etc., all figure into the eguation.
If you have data to the contrary why not simply present it rather than making the antagonistic comment about my doing you a disservice?
eric: If you have data to the contrary why not simply present it rather than making the antagonistic comment about my doing you a disservice?

I'm going to make a wild guess and assume you are referring to this -

***In my opinion the many suicidal bombings of religionists and the complete absence of the same of atheists***

You made a blanket assertion of fact without evidence. You relied on your belief that had no substance. You were using your religious brain.

a) the onus is not on me to provide you with data. The falseness of that statement btw is common knowledge to anyone who has read any atheist literature on the troubling topic of suicide bombing.

b) your statement belongs in the same category as nazis believed in evolution, therefore all evolutionists are nazis.

There are minimum standards here Eric. If you cannot make some effort to meet them, then you should control your impulse to post.
Religion has been banned before, and usually the act of banning was as bad or worse than the actual religion. Banning religion amounts to state atheism which for one thing has been the main criticism of atheism from theists. You know the deal..."atheistic governments have killed millions of people, therefore atheists are just as bad" etc.

And how would the ban be enforced? Throw people in jail? Destroy historical artifacts? (These have been done.) Banning makes martyrs out of religious people and gives substance to claims of persecution. Forbidding something usually serves to make it more appealing and will make some people all the more determined. Since theism is something mental, I think an attempt to ban could also lead to a witch-hunt atmosphere.
Please see my response to Dannyisms.
I think any extreme and absolute ideology can lead to destruction on a massive scale.
I think the survival of the planet and our species is worth it.
What you're saying is the exact same thing that the religious extremist say. What makes you any better?

RSS

CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS

Latest Activity

sflmac joined DeafAtheist's group
Thumbnail

Signing Atheists

I was going to set up a group for Deaf Atheists, but figured I'd probably be alone in here if I did that so I figured I'd open it to anyone who knows sign language or even interested in learning it.
37 minutes ago
Dennis Michael Pennington commented on blue pashmina's blog post Not believing in an afterlife does not mean i am a "sad' person.
"Living forever is not what it's cracked up to be. I'm not sad, but I do get tired more often. Imagine how sad and tired you would be after a few hundred years of singing praises and hosannas with God. Maybe it wouldn't even take that…"
51 minutes ago
matthew greenberg replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds...
"awesome finds Mel!  keep em coming!"
51 minutes ago
Dennis Michael Pennington commented on Wyatt's blog post Theists, Cargo Cults, and Logic
"I agree with Two Cult Survivor. The theist already knows that he is correct, and he has the evidence, the Holy Bible - the "word of God." The theist puts it on YOU to show evidence that God is non-existent and he walks around talking to…"
57 minutes ago
Akron SSA posted a status
1 hour ago
Steph S. commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
"Summer school starts next week for me."
1 hour ago
Pat commented on Randall Smith's blog post The Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming
"@blue pashima. The woman being interviewed by Blitzer has a TON of class! @Randall. I tend to agree about rednecks.  Personal bias on my part, but the sound of Country and Western music is, to me, the equivalent of a knife scraping against a…"
1 hour ago
Napoleon Bonaparte shared their discussion on Twitter
1 hour ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service