Why religion is fundamentally and basically immoral and evil, and should be banned.

Like no other existing human enterprise, religion will one day lead its insane followers to start a nuclear war that will destroy us all over some insult to it or its deity or to the breaking of one of its commandments.
There is no comparable threat to our very existence from any other form of human activity.



Views: 225

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Religion should not be banned. It should be held to ridicule and scorn but not banned. Eric I hope you are joking. This kind of extremist thinking is identical to the "jihadists" and "branch davidians", and should not be tolerated among atheists. Violence against any person, religious or otherwise, because of some belief they hold is truly what needs to be "banned".
To paraphrase the gun control mantra:

If you ban religion only the fundamental extremists will be religious. You try telling some cleric in Crapistan that his religion is banned now. Remember, this is the same idiot that is offended by a stupid cartoon.

Now, banning ignorance would be a more noble cause, although almost as equally impossible.
Now, banning ignorance would be a more noble cause

Then this post wouldn't be here.
You are right that nuclear war has an aura of finality about it for human survival. Any causal factors that are not in dispute as a catalyst for such a holocaust should be repelled at almost any cost. But the empirical evidence for the causal factors requiring a preemptive response (we went down this road in 2003) should be unimpeachable.

The observation of religious activity and its conflicts as an inevitable causation for nuclear deployment should be beyond reproach or criticism of any kind. Given the exacting nature of the analysis of religion as a certain premise for nuclear horror, can you relate a scenario as highly plausible hypothesis involving religion and/or its conflicts generating a trigger for nuclear deployment?
The inherent problem with banning any viewpoint, especially a religious one, is that it will inevitably end in the viewpoint becoming revolutionary, and therefore attractive. While religion is certainly a misguiding viewpoint and should be frowned upon, banning it would be a foolish move.

You would be making religion a more viable form of anarchy.
Freedom from religion and freedom of religion are two inseparable sides of the same coin. Any power invasive enough to make that decision for individuals will take the role of religion. The Soviet Union was very much a replacement religion for it's citizens as it suppressed other religions.
Lots of luck with that.

Not something I support,[I think the premise is facile and naive at best]

However,I DO believe war and starvation are evil and should be banned.
However,I DO believe war and starvation are evil and should be banned.

Yeah! And so should unrequited love, insomnia, and jerks!!!
Don't forget women with muscly calves and emoticon reetards.
And pandas.
Topless old people, too
Canned muzak. Makes me wanna go apeshit no end. Especially in restaurants.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

Joan Denoo posted blog posts
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to Dr. Terence Meaden's discussion Human Genome 45,000 years old reconstructed in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
1 hour ago
Future commented on Čenek Sekavec's blog post What is your favorite bible verse?
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo liked Dr. Terence Meaden's discussion Human Genome 45,000 years old reconstructed
1 hour ago
jlaz replied to James M. Martin's discussion Clown Show Coming: Why the Republitards Will Lose in 2016 Unless They Wise Up and Pick a Charismatic Candidate
1 hour ago
jlaz replied to James M. Martin's discussion Clown Show Coming: Why the Republitards Will Lose in 2016 Unless They Wise Up and Pick a Charismatic Candidate
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo commented on Daniel W (Sentient Biped)'s group Godless in the garden
1 hour ago
sk8eycat commented on Former Pastor's blog post Divorcing The Church
1 hour ago
jlaz replied to James M. Martin's discussion Clown Show Coming: Why the Republitards Will Lose in 2016 Unless They Wise Up and Pick a Charismatic Candidate
1 hour ago
booklover replied to Bertold Brautigan's discussion Raëlian DNA research project: Science proves that consecrated wafers are still wheat and not Jesus
1 hour ago
booklover replied to Bertold Brautigan's discussion Raëlian DNA research project: Science proves that consecrated wafers are still wheat and not Jesus
1 hour ago
booklover commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
1 hour ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service