i see there is "Black Freethought" as one of the groups listed on the main page. is there something different about black freethought as opposed to white freethought or just freethought without any race attached? would it be tolerated to post a "white freethought" or "caucasian freethought" group? this is sickening that this is allowed here.
Hmm. From my perspective on the outside, it seems to me that there is a very long history of evangelicalism and spirituality in the black community. Much of it due to their history here in the U.S., especially in the deep south. Church was a very large part of their lives and community. This is much too large a topic if you wanted to get into all the bigotry and slavery issues. But any cursory examination of history will show it to be the case.
As such, there must be a heavy stigma associated with being an African American atheist in many of those communities. So I can see there being a place for such a group here.
Yeah, I'd say people in some sub-groups have had a specific type of experience (in this instance, maybe lack of social acceptance) and would like to be in contact with others who understand that experience.
There are lots of groups here. I am not a member of Black Freethought, but I do not feel offended. Groups do have special reasons to have gather so that the subjects of interest can be discussed etc. I am sure you can join the group if you wish. This is not a "bash white people" group!
Ask yourself, is there a reason to have a vegan group, or an environmental group or a science group (or a black group). Do you have an interest in all these groups?... maybe or maybe not.
Start whatever group you like. I think you are over-reacting by your claim that this is "sickening".
PS - I am a 48 year old white man... just to be clear.
Well, yeah, but I don't think desirefirst is talking about physiology. He's talking about race as a social exclusion factor between groups, ie race as defined by racism. That's how I saw it anyway.
"Sickle-cell disease, usually presenting in childhood, occurs more commonly in people (or their descendants) from parts of tropical and sub-tropical regions where malaria is or was common. One-third of all indigenous inhabitants of Sub-Saharan Africa carry the gene[2], because in areas where malaria is common, there is a survival value in carrying only a single sickle-cell gene (sickle cell trait).[3] Those with only one of the two alleles of the sickle-cell disease are more resistant to malaria, since the infestation of the malaria plasmodium is halted by the sickling of the cells which it infests.
The prevalence of the disease in the United States is approximately 1 in 5,000, mostly affecting Americans of Sub-Saharan African descent, according to the National Institutes of Health.[4] In the United States, about 1 in 500 black births have sickle-cell anemia."
Race is a social construct not a biological one. Sickle cell anemia is a disease the affects black people, but one must understand genetics to understand diseases. On a genetic level, sickle cell anemia is a trade off for protection against falciparum malaria, which was more dangerous in certain areas of the globe. For instance, tropical regions were dark skin was a benefit to protect them from the heavy sun.