Why Atheist Libertarians Are Part of America's 1 Percent Problem

Thinking Ron Paul is a genius because he’s anti-war and anti-drug law is like thinking a Big Mac is good for you because it has lettuce and a pickle.

http://www.alternet.org/belief/why-atheist-libertarians-are-part-am...

 
 
 
 

In the days running up to Thanksgiving, Walmart urged its workers to donate food to their most in-need colleagues. You know, instead of Walmart having to pay said workers a livable wage. When people ask me what libertarianism looks like, I tell them that. By people I mean atheists, because for some stupid reason, far too many of my non-believer brethren have hitched their wagon to the daftest of all socio-economic theories.

It doesn’t help when atheist luminaries publicly extol their libertarianism. Penn Jillette writes, “What makes me a libertarian is what makes me an atheist—I don’t know. If I don’t know, I don’t believe….I’ll wait for real evidence and then I’ll believe.”

Well, the only excuse Jillette has for his breathtaking ignorance is that he earns his living performing as a Las Vegas magician. Also, he graduated from a clown college.

Famed science author and editor of Skeptic magazine Michael Shermer says he became a libertarian after reading Ayn Rand’s tome Atlas Shrugged. Wait, what? That’s the book that continues to inspire college sophomores during the height of their masturbatory careers, typically young Republicans (nee fascists). But unless your name is Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI), most people grow out of the, “Screw you, I have mine” economic principles bestowed by the Russian-born philosopher by the time they’re legally old enough to order their first beer.

Atheists like to joke that faith makes a virtue out of not thinking about things, but the belief in libertarianism is an act of faith given libertarianism has not only never been tried before anywhere, but most of the world’s leading economists denounce it as a folly that would exacerbate the central economic challenges we face today—most significantly, wealth disparity.

When I hear an atheist say he is a libertarian, I know he's given absolutely no thought to it other than the fact that he likes the sound of no foreign wars and no drug laws. The aphorism that libertarians are Republicans with bongs is just about spot-on. Thinking Ron Paul is a genius because he’s anti-war and anti-drug laws is like thinking a Big Mac is good for you because it has lettuce and a pickle.

Atheists who embrace libertarianism often do so because they believe a governing body represents the same kind of constructed authority they’ve escaped from in regards to religion. This makes sense if one is talking about a totalitarian regime, but our Jeffersonian democracy, despite its quirky flaws, is government by the people for the people, and it was the federal government that essentially built the great American middle-class, the envy of the world. In an op-ed titled “Abject Failure of Reaganomics,” Robert Parry writes, “From the New Deal policies of the 1930s through other reforms of the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s, from Social Security to Wall Street regulation to labor rights to the GI Bill to the Interstate Highway System to the space program’s technological advances to Medicare and Medicaid to the minimum wage to civil rights.”

But then came the period of Reagan’s holy trinity: privatization, deregulation and free trade. Now here we are today, facing the largest economic crisis since the 1930s. Libertarianism will serve only to replace government with a feudal serf model, which is what corporations are pushing so hard to achieve. In short, libertarianism can be described as anti-communism or "capitalism with the gloves off." With communism, property is theft; capitalists are thuggish villains; workers rule; the poor are oppressed. With libertarianism, property is sacred; all governments are bad; capitalists are noble heroes; unions are evil; and the poor are pampered good-for-nothings.

Libertarians love abstract, fact-free arguments because there are no facts to support their arguments. Atheists love facts, so I don’t understand why so many are libertarians. I guess they viewed a YouTube documentary on how the Federal Reserves is the source of all evil, and yelled, “Uh huh!”

Robert Reich says that one of the most deceptive ideas embraced by the Ayn Rand-inspired Right is that the free market is natural, and exists outside and beyond government. He writes:

“In reality, the 'free market' is a bunch of rules about 1) what can be owned and traded (the genome? slaves? nuclear materials? babies? votes?); 2) on what terms (equal access to the Internet? the right to organize unions? corporate monopolies? the length of patent protections?); 3) under what conditions (poisonous drugs? unsafe foods? deceptive Ponzi schemes? uninsured derivatives? dangerous workplaces?); 4) what’s private and what’s public (police? roads? clean air and clean water? healthcare? good schools? parks and playgrounds?); 5) how to pay for what (taxes, user fees, individual pricing?). And so on. These rules don’t exist in nature; they are human creations. Governments don’t 'intrude' on free markets; governments organize and maintain them. Markets aren’t 'free' of rules; the rules define them.”

When it comes to wealth disparity and income inequality, America is facing its greatest moral crisis since the Civil Rights movement, and its greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression. We are here today because of the influence of Wall Street when it comes to economic policy; the destruction of labor; the serf-level minimum wage; and the deregulation, monopolization and privatization of industries. Libertarianism will not only push us deeper into becoming a winner-takes-all society, it will help religious organizations fill the vacuum created by the destruction of government.

Ultimately, atheist libertarians are not part of the solution; atheist libertarians are part of the problem.

Views: 750

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hiram, this is so great!

"Thinking Ron Paul is a genius because he’s anti-war and anti-drug law is like thinking a Big Mac is good for you because it has lettuce and a pickle."

And on Michael Shermer - "became a libertarian after reading Ayn Rand’s tome Atlas Shrugged. Wait, what? That’s the book that continues to inspire college sophomores during the height of their masturbatory careers, typically young Republicans"

and more seriously, "Libertarianism will serve only to replace government with a feudal serf model, which is what corporations are pushing so hard to achieve"

and

"With communism, property is theft; capitalists are thuggish villains; workers rule; the poor are oppressed. With libertarianism, property is sacred; all governments are bad; capitalists are noble heroes; unions are evil; and the poor are pampered good-for-nothing."

That writing sparkles with wit.  I think even if I didn't agree with the author, I feel like I would like them.  I liked libertarianism from when I was 16 to maybe 16 1/2 years old.  Then somehow I realized it was self aggrandizing, arrogant, narcissistic, and as the author states, without any evidence to support it. 

Ron Paul would not have been good for any of us.  Neither would Rand Paul.  Neither would Paul Ryan.

At some point, I expect the pendulum to swing back and we get another Reagan-spawned politician in the presidency.  I hope not.  But it wouldn't surprise me, after Bush followed Clinton.

I wrote an Epicurean critique of Ayn Rand philosophy (well, one of several) that you may enjoy

http://theautarkist.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/the-two-signs/

Enjoyed reading your critique.

Hiram, thanks for this post!  I know a woman who is an Atheist and a libertarian.  She acts very smug when she says she is a libertarian.  I don't like her personally, but I liked her less when I heard her talk about this.  This is when we were on a homeschool field-trip to our states capitol years ago.  I felt like asking her if she was going to drive home on the highways that the public shares, and why did she use the library so much for homeschooling, etc. She is a lawyer, not that that has anything to do with it.  I'm glad I don't have to see her anymore.  I'm not smart enough to argue with her!~ Mindy

I saw (on youtube) Penn Jillette's visit to the Glenn Beck show; it was visibly awkward and uncomfortable to look at :) here's the guy from the 'bullshit' video series talking to one of the most embarrassing bullshitters in American television, a fascist paranoid racist Mormon who wants the country to degenerate into theocracy .... and he was so humble with Glenn Beck!  It was so dissonant ...

When I turned Libertarian and let others know about it, they kept on asking me just how "liberal" I was?

Years ago when I belonged to the Christian Anti-Communist Crusade some people kept asking me when I became communist? Very strange.

BTW, Penn Jillette is a Libertarian. I guess it means he can put up with your belief without really having to believe it himself. That is what is good with America.

I'm sorry Tonya, where did I say I wouldn't let her explain her views? I heard her views. I think her views are stupid and I don't like her. I don't like abrasive people either.
I'm with you again Mel.

same here Mel.  and it's nice to see this Mel thing catching on :)

MATT, only you are supposed to call me Mel! lol.  Nobody on here will know who I am anymore. booklover, Melinda, Mindy, Mel,...

With all your name changes, I'm starting to wonder if the police are after you. 

That's it Carl!  You have me pegged!  Signed, um.... Dorothy

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

MJ

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service