From the time of Cold war the Capitalist's and communist's were contravene each-other.But whose Ideology and main motto of work is good.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Jonathan Chang on March 7, 2013 at 3:36am Neither. Realism over ideology. Unlike on paper, human nature is, if anything, unpredictable.
Permalink Reply by Nathaniel Summers on March 7, 2013 at 7:22am Neither extreme is the way to go. There are advantages and disadvantages to all economic strategies. It is best to take what is good about each and attempt to balance them into the best we can come up with. At the very least, deciding beforehand which is to be preferred doesn't do us any good. Both camps, in this regard, will often demonize the other. Communists will rail against the evils of capitalism, capitalists will rail against the evils of communism. They will both be right, they will both be wrong. But if we label one or the other evil, we can't sit down and have an adult conversation about any of it.
Permalink Reply by Secular Forces 2013 on March 7, 2013 at 7:46am captialism
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2013-03/07/c_132216734.htm
totalitarianism against women:
http://www.stltoday.com/news/national/arkansas-adopts-us-s-most-res...
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on March 9, 2013 at 3:54am Why?
Permalink Reply by EJN on March 10, 2013 at 1:41pm Well I think that while everyone should be equal under the law -- in essence everyone is not inherently equal. So when looking at what economic model or what system of government will work best it must be pragmatic. It has to work with human nature and not combat it.
Permalink Reply by Napoleon Bonaparte on March 7, 2013 at 10:46am The capitalists were the goodies and the Communists were the badies. Alternatively, the capitalists were the badies and the communists were the goodies.

Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on March 8, 2013 at 1:40am Questions such as "Which is better?" and "Which is best?" are incomplete and every answer misleads.
Until "for whom?" is added, they remain incomplete.
Which is better for whom? Worse for whom?
Permalink Reply by Susan Stanko on March 8, 2013 at 8:29am What don't you understand?
Joan Denoo liked Dallas the Phallus's discussion Tamar Gendler: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Politics and Economics
Debra Stevenson replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion HM Facebook page feud with lds
Tom Sarbeck replied to Dallas the Phallus's discussion Tamar Gendler: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Politics and Economics in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Debra Stevenson replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion HM Facebook pagw argument from a LDS
Debra Stevenson replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion HM Facebook pagw argument from a LDS
Chrissie Farthing replied to James M. Martin's discussion St. Anthony Falls Bridge, Minnesota in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
David Layton replied to Leslee Love's discussion What do YOU think the Doctor's greatest secret is? in the group The Tardis Page
Debra Stevenson replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion HM Facebook pagw argument from a LDS© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.