"Here's the real poser: did Wolf know beforehand that she was an atheist and toss her a a hanging curve ball to hit out of the park?!?Atheism - It's A Conspiracy!!! Muahahahahahaha!"
 |
The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
Which Bible Version Is Best?
Which is a pretty contentious question, and an odd one to ask as an atheist. My question is: what are the strengths and weaknesses of the different English translations of the Bible?
Readability, enjoyability of that read (poeticness would be a factor if it was a word) and a certain amount of consistency to the source material are all factors. I'm mostly interested in the Old Testament: It's got some pretty cool stories, I celebrate Jewish holidays with my Jewish friends and I want to know what's going on, and it's a little bit about making fun of Christians.
I haven't found any satisfactory answer on the interwebs or on the nexus. There's too much information that I can't adequately filter and, besides, I want you know you lovely peoples opinions.
(Something I've heard: Richard Dawkins likes The King James Version because of the poetic Elizabethan Prose)
Tags: Bible
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Steph S. on -
All of them are bad. They have the bible online -- if you really want to read it. It will make you a stronger atheist.
-
Permalink Reply by booklover on -
I've never understood how someone could read the bible and then call it "the good book". It's horrible. Horrible stories, bad writing, etc. Why would anyone even WANT it to be true. Sick.
-
Permalink Reply by Jason Fleming on -
I agree, KJV is the best version for consistency. Its funny how such a derivative piece of fiction got so many remakes.
-
Permalink Reply by Matt VDB on -
When it comes to consistency to the source material, that's really not true though. The KJV is several centuries old; modern Bible translations have the advantage of centuries of scholarship into Ancient Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic.
The KJV is probably the most poetic version, but for the same reason it's also one of the least close to the source material by modern standards.
-
Permalink Reply by Bruce Griffin on -
I really like the full, unedited version of the KJB. I live in a remote area and sometimes run out of TP.
-
Permalink Reply by Regina Goodwin on -
TP. ROFLMAO
-
Permalink Reply by heretic zero on -
One problem, with any bible, is that many people have the reading comprehension of an 8th grader. Upper level readers, in college, read at a 10th grade education level. This is an obstacle for those who read their bibles, they have no comprehension of what they read. Many gloss over many scriptures that would prove Christianity a false religion, such as the Book of Jeremiah. Others do not read beyond their religious books to understand that the Book of John, introduction, is a plagiarized version of the writings of the pagan Greek philosopher Heraclitus who wrote of The Logos 500 years before the common era. He was writing about creation through the power of Zeus. Christians stole this philosophy and wrote it into the intro to the book of John. Many people read texts at face value without really investigating the origin of their reading materials. So, it really doesn't matter what Bible one uses because most Christians only read the parts that satisfy their own church doctrine and ignore the rest of the bible.
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on
-
I've read maybe 10% of KJV; only sentences in other versions.
After 12 years of next-worldly Catholicism, Song of Solomon is pleasantly this-worldly.
I found more value in collections of quotations, and works on pragmatism and existentialism.
-
Permalink Reply by Tiffany on
-
When I was taking biblical scholarship classes in undergraduate, we used the New Revised Standard version of the bible. Most scholars consider this version to be the most accurate. As others have said, while the KJV is more poetic, it is by no means the most accurate translation. A good rule is that the older the manuscripts used in translation, the better. (However, this is assuming that the older translations don't have deliberate 'corrections' or changes.)
I haven't read my copy of the bible in awhile, but I found the translation to be pretty readable and accessible. HTH!
-
Permalink Reply by Richard ∑wald on -
The Lego Bible...
-
Permalink Reply by Pat on -
R. Crumb's The Book of Genesis Illustrated. Shows, in graphic detail, the absolute assinine ancient fables that lead to the evil which is present day Abrahamic religions - Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
-
Permalink Reply by Richard ∑wald on
-
Excellent!
I'd forgotten about this...
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Randall Smith posted a blog postThe Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming
Actually, the rednecks are here and everywhere. Let me say, I'm not a big fan of these people. That's putting it mildly. Need I describe them? You know who I mean.This seems to be the time of year when they come out of the woodwork. Here in Indiana, as the weather gets nice, the motorcyclists are out in full force. I hate the noise cycles make. Then there's the Indianapolis 500 fans, the majority of which are rednecks. Interview them or a typical Pacer fan (big news as they face the Miami…See More
Loren Miller commented on Joan Denoo's photo
Tunisian Women 4
"War is Peace.Ignorance is Strength.Freedom is Slavery.and...Rape is the woman's fault? No, sorry, too much of a stretch, even for George Orwell."
Dennis Michael Pennington commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Pope's 'exorcism' caught on film video"Maybe so. Ad that the Pope has no power over anything or anybody except for the power given to him by the office and the world at large today."
Dennis Michael Pennington commented on matthew greenberg's blog post War on Christmas in May"Happy Holidays is a good enough saying for anyone at Christmas time. I support the phrase "happy holidays" rather than the bullshit most Americans were taught. Let's go back in time to look at meanings here. "Holidays"…"
Photos
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
