"I guess I am redneck. As a child I talked twangy and it seemed to be what those around me were doing. Imagine the worst redneck accent and I had it. I joined the Army and my training instructor asked what part of Georgia I was from. He was…"
 |
The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
Where were the righties on spending when the Bush era slogged through?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by jay H on -
It all depends on who's in power. The Republicans had their justification for reckless spending, the Dems now push theirs. BOTH parties are, despite PR statements, hopelessly addicted to unsustainable levels of spending, like a drunken fratboy with his daddy's credit card. That's how they buy votes.
-
Permalink Reply by Sentient Biped on -
Drunken frat boy with his daddy's credit card. Is that GWB we're talking about? :)
-
Permalink Reply by James Kz on -
Despite all their hatred of "socialistic" ideas, they are just as socialist as anyone else.
They would never give up a publicly-funded military for example.
And what about all that money they gave to NASCAR in the recent budget showdown? (Seventy million dollars - if you called NASCAR enthusiasts socialists they would turn you into a pretzel)
-
Permalink Reply by jay H on
-
@James
I agree even though the military is specifically defined as government supported in the Constitution. Both parties, unfortunately since FDR/Truman have been obsessed with the impractical and ultimately destructive goal of 'managing' the world with a worldwide military footprint, something we cannot afford economically, or with lives.
As a side point, the NASCAR incident shows the danger of going by sound bites. I was pretty appalled by it too but it's not quite what one would think from the headlines. First it was not new but an extension of an existing tax rule, it applied to a wide range of entertainment complexes, and it was actually a relatively common exemption that allowed tracks to depreciate their facilities at a faster rate than conventional manufacturing buildings. Yes it was still pork but not quite as bizarre as one would think.
But that brings up the very big problem of pork. Inthe Sandy relief bill, large amounts of local pet projects were thrown in by both parties. There are only a very handful of congress people who actually refuse to put pork into bills.
-
Permalink Reply by Sentient Biped on
-
But NASCAR is vital to national security. The ability to drive fast cars in circles will help us chase Al-Queda when they start running in circles around a paved track.
-
Permalink Reply by Pat on -
Here's another interesting question? Where were the progressives and the left when the Senate passed a bill, a few weeks ago, gutting the 4th Amendment's privacy protections? Your emails and electronic communications can now be searched by law enforcement without getting a warrant from a judge. People scream, on both sides, about the fiscal situation and the 2nd Amendment. Constitutional protections which are more important on a daily basis, to more citizens, than "What Caliber Would Jesus Use" are stripped away without so much as a whimper. The left screamed at the top of their lungs when Bush approved warrantless phone taps. Where's the outrage now?
-
Permalink Reply by jay H on
-
The left only screams when there's a Repub in power. With a Democratic Senate and President, they fall completely silent.
Both major parties talk the language of freedom, but neither one actually behaves that way. Freakin hypocrites. The enemy of your enemy is not your friend.
-
Permalink Reply by Pat on
-
The enemy of your enemy is not your friend. Ain't that the truth!
Major examples are when the Irish Republican Army tried that in the 1970's with Libya, and it blew up in their face. And recently, the secularist Tuaregs tried it with Al-Qaeda in Mali, and now they're living under a bayonet to their throat with strict Sharia law.
As to the left screaming when a Repub is in power, the Repubs are a mirror image of Dems. Today, the President is having a private swearing in ceremony. I suspect the Teabaggers are having their own private swearing at ceremony. Depending on your special interests, pick your poison.
-
Permalink Reply by Secular Forces 2013 on -
i noticed a sticker on electric box at intersection said 'thanks for shit sandwich george' w/obama photo
-
Permalink Reply by Secular Forces 2013 on
-
ha.. he pandered to these schmux
(refer to my latest blog post.. form hell! yikes
-
Permalink Reply by A. Noni Moose on
-
Never voted for Bush..and to call him a "righty" would be false. No one EVER considered him a conservative..a rebulican, maybe. He was a big government socialist just like today's regime. The "patriot act" was the biggest power grab and loss of liberty this country has seen. Did anyone stand against it? Democrats? Republicans? NOPE. I think the only vote against the patriot act was Dr. Ron Paul. The rest of the country took it at face value and said "we need it" becuase of 9/11. Well, like they say "if you aere willing to give up liberty for security, you deserve neither"..
Bush brought us Obama..hopefully the failings of Obama will bring us something better. But, that is doubtful since we are already on the slippery slope.
As far as the "surplus" goes, we all know that was just smoke and mirrors from Slick Willy.
CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Dennis Michael Pennington commented on Randall Smith's blog post The Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming
G replied to Loren Miller's discussion Latest Activity?"I can't upload photos, where is the option of photo uploading ?"
Easton Le commented on blue pashmina's blog post Not believing in an afterlife does not mean i am a "sad' person."@Rachel: Realizing I have only one life to live also encourages me to live a happier and fuller life, as well as invest in a future I know I will not be around to appreciate. It seems only logical to me.
@Dennis: I've always wondered what it…"
"Loren, i was thinking about you and your likely response as i was writing this post. i know your rightful indignation with the papacy and share it, albeit probably with slightly less ire.
i must say that i just freaking love your pov.…"
Easton Le commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Some Wiccans and their seeking approval from Christians"I suppose in regions of the country where Christianity is a major influence in local culture working towards a level of acceptance would be in Wicca's best interest. When I visited a gem shop in the bible belt with one of my friends I learned…"
Loren Miller replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Pope Francis says even Atheists go to Heaven"Hmmm, an outreach to atheists from the pope? I wonder ... is this an attempt at engagement and maybe a dialogue ... or is it an act of desperation from an organization which may finally be recognizing that it is failing at both engagement and…"
Karim R. joined Darrel Ray's group
Recovering from Religion
Unless you were raised by atheist parents, you probably had some recovering to do when you left religion. The purpose of RR is to provide a landing place for people when they jump from religion. With local support groups throughout the US, Canada, UK, and Australia, and real-time resources accessible to everyone, RR is where to turn when faith has lost its luster.See More
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Methane, more scary than we thought in the group Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists"In addition to the methane spike over Antarctica there was
Is the permafrost's integrity breaking down?
In sum, the half-life of methane in the atmosphere depends upon available hydroxyl ions to break it down. The oft cited values of methane…"
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
