This is a quickie - how old we you when you were first TAUGHT about evolution.
In the UK, it was in advanced biology - an optional class for school leavers and I was about 17 at the time - in 1980. (Oh god, I'm old!)
I didn't understand it: accepted it, yes, but didn't understand it.
Anyone who knows me well might find this surprising, because I didn't bother looking at evolution proper until a couple of decades back - while researching something completely different.
These days, evolution is taught in secondary schools (at least, it should be) which puts it in the age 11-16 or 11-18 depending on when the child started.
Dawkins thinks - and I heartily agree - we should introduce this cornerstone of Biology in primary science - so I wonder, how many people hear came to understand Darwin later in life?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Marc Draco on September 26, 2011 at 10:59am It is faith, but the problem is the word has been hijacked just like "theory" has.
I have faith in science, for example, that's not religion, it's faith in things that are rational; even if I can't see or prove them myself.
If my verbage is accurate, I suspect that faith is becoming something of "weasel word". Here's the wikipedia article which might clear that up (and then again, it might not.)
Permalink Reply by Diana Bett on September 26, 2011 at 11:06am
Permalink Reply by Marc Draco on September 26, 2011 at 11:12am Wasn't aware that I had, Diana. Sorry if I gave that impression.
Like most atheists here, you'll find that I'm a thinker. Faith in science is still belief but belief with evidence to back it up.
From my Mac's dictionary:
- a system of religious belief: the Christian faith.
- a strongly held belief or theory: the faith that life will expand until it fills the universe.
Note that the first sense is secular, but this really is a weasel word. I wonder if anyone else could suggest something more suitable? Trust, perhaps?
Permalink Reply by Diana Bett on September 26, 2011 at 8:13pm
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on September 27, 2011 at 1:43am Wait a minute, why do I feel envy for your ability to feel an emotional reaction and then ask why you feel that way?
Can it be because I was born male, males are supposed to be logical, and logical discourses lack something?
Thanks for saying it so clearly.
"I think,
Therefore I am,"
Said the philosopher.
Bunk! He didn't feel; he only
Half-was.
(Using the cinquain form devised by American poet Adelaide Crapsey: five lines; 2, 4, 6, 8, qnd 2 syllables.)
Permalink Reply by Diana Bett on September 27, 2011 at 8:21am
Permalink Reply by Erik Weissengruber on October 6, 2011 at 3:01am Really, Fantasia and visits to the planetarium inoculated me against fundamentalist nonsense at an early age. I never saw the need for the universe to have a King/Daddy/Traffic Cop making sure everything ran smoothly.
Permalink Reply by Grace Fitzpatrick on October 6, 2011 at 3:37pm
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Tom Sarbeck replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary
Tom Sarbeck replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Jim DePaulo replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.