Permalink Reply by Engl on June 10, 2012 at 11:54pm No one has the right to. But the people around them have a way of bringing that to fruition. I guess it depends on the culture that you're in.
Again, no one has the right to put any married couple asunder... :D
No one has any "rights" that cannot be violated by other individuals. Still, some actions are inherently "not right". Some times force is the only way to protect what you believe is right. Sadly, force usually invites a counter force of disproportionate strength. Skillful dialogue may be your greatest tool for forging connections with others that disagree with your ideal of what is right. "Quid pro Quo" has its place as well.
On the other hand, they can't very well break up a marriage that they are not aware of. Some ties should be severed if they are pulling you under the surface. Make sure that you evaluate ALL of the consequences carefully before acting.
Good Luck ;)
Permalink Reply by dr kellie on July 3, 2012 at 4:14pm Why is it wrong for a brother and sister to want to get married and spend their lives together? If they are both adults and realize that they should not have children, why would anyone care? My gut reaction is, "gross", but what difference does that make?
Suppose a brother and sister had never met until udulthood and they became mates without knowing. Is there something wrong with that?
I know this might open up a whole new can of worms, but what the hell.
Permalink Reply by Prog Rock Girl on July 3, 2012 at 4:16pm Yes..."gross" is not always the same as "immoral". Having children would be immoral because it could hurt the children genetically.
Permalink Reply by A. R. on June 12, 2012 at 10:30pm In a modern and civilized society, no adult(s) has de-facto rights over other adult(s). So the answer is a "Hell no". But as we all know, there are cases where even laws are passed preventing consenting adults to marry... and I am sure you all know what I am talking about.
Permalink Reply by Secular Forces 2013 on July 2, 2012 at 8:16am
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on July 3, 2012 at 6:11am Couple of questions:
Regardless if we're referring to interracial marriage or gay marriage, there is no RATIONAL reason to prevent such unions. Mostly the "reasons" opponents of these marriages come up with amount to fear, fear of something different, fear of a break with the former homogeneity of the existing culture. Sorry, not good enough.
The harm in such a union as perceived by bigoted members relates to the first question. Again, fear of change from the status quo or what some holy book has taught them. Again, none of this rises to the level of genuine harm.
As for the society itself, is this a democratic society or an autocratic dictatorship? Do all members of this culture have the opportunity to contribute and have input on its structure, or are the rules pronounced ex officio or ex cathedra as unquestioned truth? Most importantly, does the minority exercise its franchise without coercion or are they to be crushed by the tyranny of the majority? Autocracy rarely if ever respects any other sensibilities other than its own, whereas democracy gives breathing room to all and authors laws to maintain order fairly while respecting the rights of the individual.
Personally, I don't see any of the above questions as being trivial or rhetorical. Certainly, any society could arrogate the power you suggest to break unions because it wants to. Whether any genuine GOOD comes from such action, however, is debatable at best.

The Flying Atheist Online

Violette Littlejohn Online

Teresita Mattox Online
Posted by Dan Meadows on May 21, 2013 at 8:50am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by Larry Taylor on May 20, 2013 at 8:15pm 5 Comments 1 Like
OK. I am venting. My mother died two weeks ago. She was a “god fearing christian.” Before her death she refused all medical treatment. She wanted to be left alone. She even refused to speak with my brother who is a methodist minister. He is a pip, let me tell you! I suspect she did not believe, but a woman born in her time could not and did not state her actual beliefs. This is the opening salvo to all christians; FUCK YOU! I had so many people come and tell…
ContinuePosted by Christy Stewart on May 20, 2013 at 2:17pm 6 Comments 0 Likes
This probably should not have shocked me as much as it did (especially since I am in Texas). I actually thought my coworkers were playing a joke on me because they know I am an atheist. Sadly, this was no joke. This actually happened.
I work in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who admit patients are general MDs. (Psychiatrists see patients after admission) Yesterday evening we received several calls from irate parents. A new doctor who was doing admissions yesterday actually…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 1:09pm 3 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this,
Nathan Young,
No Jason Torpy it is you that should be banned for promoting atheism, a belief that has no foundation in reality and zero proof behind it. The letter was a mockery of your atheist beliefs. I request to the board here that they remove Jason for his unverifiable beliefs in atheism for which he has no proof other than his arrogance. The letter was a mockery of atheism. Atheism is stupid and it should be mocked and it…
Continue© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.