In another thread, reference was made to some people's criticism of a position known as "scientism," and the statement was made that scientists aren't believers in scientism and, further, that nobody is.

I'm not so sure. What, exactly, is wrong with scientism?

Tags: scientism

Views: 230

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I've been in Usenet since around 1989, so I'm familiar with the problem, or opportunity. If a thread doesn't drift it's sterile. I'm not sure to whom the courtesy is addressed.

If you follow a group, then you know what to ignore, or who to ignore. If you've never been, then the thread titles seldom indicate quite the matter being considered.

It's a matter of balance, as I see it. If there were no checks on thread drig then there'd be no need of topics, groups or suchlike, it would all be there, in one thread.

If it's controlled too much, then there's no discussion. the moment something moves from the precise parameters of the original title, it's censored - I say 'love is blind', you reply, 'other things are blind too' - down comes the guillotine - it's love, only love.

Moderation, though not in excess, and manners are, I agree, everything in discussion, not only in disembodied fora.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

Idaho Spud commented on DAN DANA's blog post RR Excerpt #11: Most Scientists Are Atheists
7 minutes ago
Grinning Cat replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
13 minutes ago
Brent Feeney replied to James M. Martin's discussion It Doesn't Take Long for this Racist Missouri Lawman to Blast Anyone Different from a Middle-Aged White Male
13 minutes ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
27 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan joined Sentient Biped's group
28 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
28 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Getting Speech Straight - "Homosexual" is not an LGBT-friendly term in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
30 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
33 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan posted a discussion
36 minutes ago
Idaho Spud liked Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs
38 minutes ago
Pat replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
40 minutes ago
Luara replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Getting Speech Straight - "Homosexual" is not an LGBT-friendly term in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
40 minutes ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service