Daniel Dennett What Should Replace Religions
Food for thought: this isn't the most riveting presentation but it provides a kickoff point for a topic we all need to consider: where should the unbelievers focus their movement?We've been kicking this around in our tiny local group. We know we must take 'baby steps' due to our size, but we also know we need a direction.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Reha ULKU on December 20, 2011 at 12:14pm Should is not a suitable helping verb. Was / is / will may be better. Religions replaced religions. Religions replace religions. And it seems religions will replace religions. Christianity had had 3 main subsets. Islam had had 2 main subsets. There are atheist Hinduisms and there are theist Hinduisms. Trinity says 3 god(let)s in a 1 godded religion. All these are replacements. Some scientists tried a science religion (not scientology, but mechanic determinism), but they failed. Human kind without religion is a post-human species.
Loren Miller replied to Dallas the Phallus's discussion 5 fascinating reasons cockroaches will outlive us all in the group Wildlife
Rachel Riley replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Loren Miller replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Two years of Egypt's Muslilm Brotherhood rule in the group Hang With Friends© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

