"I don't want to be the "I don't like change cos its different" guy but I am having probs with the new layout.
The main way I used this site was to scan through the new forums posts when i landed on the front page.
Its great that…"
 |
The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
What, in your opinion, is the best or most effective argument FOR the existence of god?
I was so curious as to the opinions of others about this question, that I had to come back on here and ask (I have been gone from here for about a month and a half or so, have been extremely sidetracked and disillusioned; I keep jumping from different activities as my mainstays, so there for a while I was on here for 6 hours a day, then I got burned out and went to reading for several hours a day).
So what is the best or most effective argument for the existence of god? I would have to say that, in my opinion, I think it would have be the teleological argument, or the argument from design. Even with the challenge of having to explain *against* natural mechanisms of self-structuring (like Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking that Victor Stenger talks about in God: The Failed Hypothesis), or all of the flaws, errors, and irregularities in the "creation" itself, and its seeming randomness and majority lack of order. (I always find myself wondering about what we know must exist way out there in space; why create that?) This seems to go hand in hand with the constants argument (I know there must be some other name for it), you know, where they talk about the dials being just so that we're in a Goldilocks zone.
Anyways, what's your take on this?
So what is the best or most effective argument for the existence of god? I would have to say that, in my opinion, I think it would have be the teleological argument, or the argument from design. Even with the challenge of having to explain *against* natural mechanisms of self-structuring (like Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking that Victor Stenger talks about in God: The Failed Hypothesis), or all of the flaws, errors, and irregularities in the "creation" itself, and its seeming randomness and majority lack of order. (I always find myself wondering about what we know must exist way out there in space; why create that?) This seems to go hand in hand with the constants argument (I know there must be some other name for it), you know, where they talk about the dials being just so that we're in a Goldilocks zone.
Anyways, what's your take on this?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Jaume on -
Depends on how you define "god". As a purely philosophical concept, its existence is evident enough ;-)
-
Permalink Reply by Langston on -
Kind of like "Well, there must be some such thing as god(s) or a god, I mean, there's a word for it so it must exist, right? Where would the word have come from if it wasn't real? Geez, GOSH, you're a freakin' idiot". Such peurile reasoning.
Anyways, enough being corny and attempting at humor; let me add a caveat that you should consider this question with your own personal definition of "god" filling in the context. So however you as an individual define it (he, she, it, everything-and-nothing, Absolute Unitary Being, etc.)
Jaume, I get the feeling you're saying god is imaginary. Either that or I'm really ignorant as hell or too oblivious to the obvious.
-
Permalink Reply by Jaume on
-
No reason to be so defensive - I didn't mean to offend. It's obvious enough that the "god" you're assuming in your initial post is what is usually refered to as the "creator god", "prime mover" or "divine watchmaker". And I can't think of a better argument for its existence than the theological one (which nevertheless has flaws of its own).
The reason that prompted my first reply was to point out that, lacking a proper definition of god, you'd better expect people to submit arguments for the existence of any kind of mythological or parodical god. Probably not what you're asking for - although I may be wrong here.
-
Permalink Reply by Jaume on
-
And I can't think of a better argument for its existence than the theological one
Oops! Funny slip of the tongue. Make that teleological, of course.
-
Permalink Reply by Langston on
-
Oh, I hadn't meant to imply you were being offensive, nothing of that sort. I was poking fun at myself, actually. And, well, theists, too, with that silly argument up front. But no, I was saying what I thought you were trying to get across, or that I didn't understand what you were saying because I either couldn't read the obvious or I was just unknowledgeable. I hadn't meant to imply that YOU were saying such things.
-
Permalink Reply by AcesLucky on -
"So what is the best or most effective argument for the existence of god?" That would be God! The best argument ever would be for god to actually, in this real world, show up! To show up in such a way that his person to everyone would be indisputable as only a god can do. All he'd have to do is make himself known. Simple.
-
Permalink Reply by OutlawGirl on -
The limitations of human minds and human senses. You can always argue that the reason we don't percieve gods is that we can't percieve gods. There could be a god standing over my shoulder right now and I wouldn't notice.
-
Permalink Reply by Vitus on -
X-rays we can't percieve too. But X-rays can expose photographic films. Untill we haven't photographic film we think about X-rays that it is fiction.
We can't prove x-ray existance without X-ray sensor.
We must deal with gods in the same manner.
-
Permalink Reply by Ben on -
That's like asking which baby is the most deadly ninja assassin from a local nursery.
-
Permalink Reply by Louis on -
While we're on this line of discussion,
Which shade of black is the most white?
-
Permalink Reply by Jim DePaulo on -
White.
CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Climate hits 400ppm of CO2 for first time in 3 million years in the group Climate Concerns"Speaking of
Michael Mann says we're raising Earth's temperature a million times faster than nature does.
"
The Flying Atheist replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds..."Now I know why I always get dirty looks when I dance. I've been using the length of the World's Smallest Bible as a measuring guide. There's not much room for the Holy Spirit, especially when I'm excited.
"
The Flying Atheist commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"Angela, we had our torrential rain and thunderstorm last night here in northern Illinois. Lots of heavy rain and gusty winds. Pretty intense. My lights flickered a few times. I thought I was going to lose power but luckily…"
Ruth Anthony-Gardner commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"I reported the order-of-comments problem to Brother Richard right away, and he fixed it.
Glad to hear you’re giving up smoking Ian. Your Mum’s health problem is especially scary to me. I had a similar problem within a few months of…"
Idaho Spud commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"Joan, I'm glad to hear your good news, and hope you don't vomit too much.
That's all I have time for now, as I'm working in the garden most of each day now."
Debra Stevenson commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"Grinning Cat,
AWWW! How precious!
Brandi Amari Williams"
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
