This was the question, as put, on a message board I saw this morning.

As atheists this seems like tautological nonsense, we can hardly be falling short of a standard set by somethgin we do not believe in or think is real.

As I framed in my reply: 

It'd be a bit like pissing off a leprechaun and having my fairy gold confiscated.

But it got me wondering, how else might you reply to such an assertion?  A|Ners - it's over to you. (As soon as the recent updates board starts working again!)



Tags: assertion, atheists, fairy, fallacy, gold, sin, tautology

Views: 8

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sin - Instead of a crime against humanity, it's a crime against inanity.
Sin is viewed differently by all, it's a matter of perspective.
Very nice, Tran-humanists must take "fate" in our own hands, if we don't take it in our own hands, then who or what will?

Also, you make Trans-Humanism seem very, "dull". Not all seek to place our consciousness into "hardware".

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service