This is probably the most complicated "forums" style website I have ever seen. It's incredibly disorganized. Think Atheist is another atheist Ning website, and while it is also frustrating to navigate, it is steps ahead of this one. I blame this mostly on Ning. Honestly, phpBB forums would be better than Ning.
One non-Ning issue that I constantly run into is that people post discussions in groups instead of on the main site. This means every person who wants to reply has to join the group. This also means the discussion will not show up on the main discussions page, forcing us to manually check the "My Groups" tab to see if there are any updates to our groups and then to manually check each updated group to see what happened. And even then, as far as I can tell, often nothing actually happened. (Maybe it indicates "activity" when someone joins?) Anyway, I see absolutely no reason to post discussions in groups, unless the subject matter is not allowed in the main forums. It just decreases the chances and frequency of a discussion being replied to and divides content and the community unnecessarily (of which "blogs" vs "discussions" already does a bang-up job). There have been several occasions where I wanted to reply to a discussion but realized the author posted it on a group page. Sorry, I'm not going to contribute to this mess by joining your group.
The front page is cluttered beyond reason. I don't even know why I go there anymore. I have actually AdBlocked a lot of crap that just took up room. When I visit AN now, I link to the "Forum" section and have it switched to "Discussions" view because the default "Categories" view is absolutely useless.
I spend a great deal of time reading the bottom right corner of the screen, "Latest Activity," because I often find it more convenient than checking 3, 4, even 5 separate pages and still not seeing all of the updates. So why is something so important just a tiny box in the corner? Think Atheist has definitely done some things right that AN could learn from.
Also, Think Atheist seems to have an updated text editor script, because the problem of the cursor randomly jumping to the beginning was fixed a while ago, same with the problem of quote mode getting stuck on.
Well, that's my critique. AN has a pretty decent community, but I would really like to see in the future the merging of sites like AN and Think Atheist onto a non-Ning platform that is more conducive to discussions.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Jeremy on November 9, 2011 at 5:06pm
Permalink Reply by Tenken on November 9, 2011 at 5:22pm I can't speak for everyone, but the only reason I come to these places is for discussion. phpBB code is freely available and provides a much better medium for holding discussions, IMO. There is no need to build from scratch. In fact, based on every experience I've had of proprietary forums, I'd say it's a very bad idea.
Having said that, I see absolutely zero chance of a Ning site ever migrating to any other forum. The owner would lose a huge chunk of his/her community just from the migration, probably the majority of them. These Ning sites are just going to ride it out until everyone moves to the next big thing. That's my prediction at least.
Finally, my complaints were about the organization of the website more than Ning. The clutter of the main page is absolutely under their control. If I had to guess, I'd say the community kind of went rogue and started this tradition of posting within groups instead of on the main forums, but it could still be requested of them not to do that, unless there is a good reason for it in the first place (in which case I'm all ears/eyes).
Permalink Reply by Jeremy on November 9, 2011 at 5:32pm
Permalink Reply by Tenken on November 9, 2011 at 5:41pm Bro, I hope you aren't trying to suggest that the communities should not give valuable feedback to admins, because that's definitely what it feels like. I was not unnecessarily harsh and did not make any personal attacks. I was just honest, as I would expect anyone to be with me.
Permalink Reply by Jeremy on November 9, 2011 at 5:46pm
Permalink Reply by booklover on November 9, 2011 at 5:09pm My only problem with this site is that when I first signed-on, it said "full name", and so I put it, not knowing they wouldn't keep it private. Now when you Google my name, it comes up with Atheist. Not that I care, but it might prevent me from getting a job. Also, I'm afraid of crazies. I did delete and sign-up again with my 'fake' name, but the original posts are still out-there.
Permalink Reply by Tenken on November 9, 2011 at 5:25pm The original posts are still there? I don't know if it's too late, but you could have changed your name in the settings, which would have changed it on all of your posts.
Permalink Reply by booklover on November 19, 2011 at 8:22am I did change my name to booklover, but if you Google my real name it is permanent in all the old posts. I don't really care, I just wish it had said it would not be private. My name is not common at all, so if I was Googled say for a job, my name would come up next to the name Atheist Nexus quite a few times. At this point in my life I really don't care though! :) Just to let others that do care know, do NOT use your real name if you don't want it coming up on the internet next to the word Atheist. I was just naive and when it said "full name", I put my full name!
Permalink Reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on November 18, 2011 at 11:51pm When you change your name, your new name becomes attached to your old posts too, in my experience. One of my friends changed his name, gender, state, picture, and description. But I saw the new name attached to my archived messages of his, so I know who he was.
Permalink Reply by booklover on November 19, 2011 at 8:23am Sorry Ruth, didn't see your reply before I replied. Yep, Ruth is correct! :)
Permalink Reply by Sentient Biped on November 9, 2011 at 6:24pm I don't have any influence with the setup of Nexus, and am not involved in the programming or design. That being said, I like the groups, the forum setup, and the rest of the site. I especially like having separate interest groups. Im very comfortable with it. Each to their own I guess.
Luara replied to Sheri M Larsen's discussion Is it fair to treat everyone equally? in the group Conservative Atheists
Ruth Anthony-Gardner added a discussion to the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
Lillie replied to Joe S.'s discussion Intergroup Intelligentsia - The Thought Police in the group Atheists, Addictions, 12 Step Recovery, and Alternatives
Sheri M Larsen replied to Sheri M Larsen's discussion Is it fair to treat everyone equally? in the group Conservative Atheists
Sheri M Larsen replied to Sheri M Larsen's discussion Is it fair to treat everyone equally? in the group Conservative Atheists© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

