Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by hunter on July 7, 2010 at 10:11am

this guy on youtube came up with this theory (or bullshit conspiracy) where he thinks that all the gays are trying to destroy society from within, and he thinks they are choosing to be gay out of a sexist rebelion. this guy is crasy but has managed to actually start a movement, this is an objective reason but its still just bullshit paranoiya that isn't true. lol

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by La Gaya Sienza on July 7, 2010 at 12:32pm

If gays have been trying to destroy society from within they have been spectacularly unsuccessful given the time available to them. After all, gays have been around since humans have been around. Given their relatively small numbers as a proportion of humanity overall, and given the oppression, discrimination, cruelty and, yes, genocide, they have suffered, it is a wonder they have survived in numbers large enough to do all the harm religious creeps accuse them of. One would have thought that the 95% of the "normal' population could have easily have exterminated them. But no, they just keep getting born "naturally" as it were, from heterosexual parents. And why would a person "choose" to be gay given all that gays have to put up with? The idea that it is a "choice" is just another rationalisation for the religious loonies to persecute them. Religious people need to have someone to hate and persecute. That's how they know they exist. They need to feel more important, more righteous, more deserving.... They just need more of everything - especially,in an already overpopulated and god ridden world, more children. Thankfully, most atheists do not need this sort of perverse validation.

Ah! Most humans disgust me.

Rob

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by hunter on July 9, 2010 at 9:47pm

no I wasn't saying that I agree with that but that I know someone who believe that. personally I don't see why anyone would have anything against homosexuals and I don't even think it should even be debated and should be an automatic right. it is a human right for people to love whoever they want in my opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Thomas Charles Hudson on July 17, 2010 at 9:13am

I am of the opinion that anything which can occur within nature is therefore of nature. Sure, there are going to be open-minded people who just want to experiment, or be trendy, or engage in such activity for a superficial reason. However, I've spoken with a few people who were gay and I asked them, "Was this a choice, or not?" Quite a few have expressed that when they were young, they discovered that they weren't interested in the same thing as everyone else, and that if they could have chosen, they'd have loved to have been straight. I saw a television program which mentioned that scientists had dissected the brains of a heterosexual male, homosexual male, heterosexual woman, and a homosexual woman. Seems that the language component of the homosexual male's brain most closely resembled that of the heterosexual woman. Biological evidence, if they managed to verify it thoroughly. That, and it might explain gays who naturally have the 'lisp' (not the fakers).

Anyhow, they've suffered so much persecution, misunderstanding, and ignorance that it would have been a breeze to be 'normal' if they could have. Unfortunately, it is our very society's persecution which makes homosexuals twice as likely to suffer from depression, drug addiction or suicide. Most of this persecution is at the hands of the religious, which serves to explain why many atheists ally themselves with homosexuals. After all, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. ~_^

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel on July 17, 2010 at 10:55pm

>>That, and it might explain gays who naturally have the 'lisp' (not the fakers).

I believe that is culturally driven like an accent or demeanor.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wesley van der Linden on August 5, 2010 at 6:49am

Hi Rob,

I jumped in, in this discussion... SO first a opinion on your intro.... (sorry members)

First of all I don't find homosexuality wrong. I am straight guy but I am not offended by thoughts that there are homosexuals and so on. What I find a shame is that religious party's find it so offensive. This because they shouldn't judge. (so says the bible, it's God's duty) If you look to the world history, homosexuality always existed. I get sick of the thoughts that homosexuality is a decease. Homosexuality is a part of us humans and also exist within the animal world. Homosexuality is a part of nature.

In my home country (the Netherlands) homosexuals can marry and adopt children and be a normal family. They have the same rights as heterosexuals. I totally agree with these rights. What a lot of people forget is that homosexuals are human in the first place and homosexual as second. In my opinion it's a difference in taste (I like girls you like men)

What a big problem is (also in the Netherlands) is the knowledge people have about homosexuality. A lot of people are convinced that homosexuality is a decease or a lack of elements is their upbringing. The biggest bull-shit I ever heard... Well almost... ;)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by New Atheist on November 19, 2010 at 10:58pm

I've heard theories on why societies have such rampant homophobia. One had to do with patriarchal societies and the need to reproduce. The other was an evolutionary theory that said many straight people are turned off at the thought of same-sex sexuality, because throughout history, the ones that were heterosexual reproduced and we died out. So, since they had this "ick" factor when thinking of being intimate with the same sex, they thought it was natural to be freaked out at it, and it became part of the culture. I'm not sure that I agree with that theory, because Kinsey says the opposite, that most people are bisexual, but culture won't let most of us acknowledge that.

In my opinion, it's the role of the government to protect the rights of the minority, not the mob mentality of the majority. So what if straights don't like us? That doesn't give them the right to make us disappear any more than right-handed people could force left-handed people to switch hands.

I don't believe a relationship must produce children in order to be an acceptable relationship. I didn't want children when I identified as straight, nor as bisexual, nor now as a lesbian.

But in any case, gay men can have a surrogate mother who carries their baby.

It's late and I'm tired, hope this was coherent!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Noah Petersen on November 22, 2010 at 2:56am

I agree with almost everything you posted. At the moment I don't recall a time I ever had any sexual feelings towards someone of the same sex. Then again, Kinsey did say most so I guess that leaves the door open for exceptions.

I had quite a few gay and lesbian friends in San Diego, but in Italy it seems much less common. I guess the whole Catholic thing makes people less comfortable talking about their sexuality.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on December 7, 2010 at 7:35pm

To quote the Isley Brothers:

"It's your thing/
Do what you wanna do/
I can't tell you/
Who to sock it to".

What consenting adults do in private is no one else's business.

If there were only 60 humans in the whole world and genetic diversity was necessary for survival of the species, then maybe other people could insist that gays contribute to the gene pool with a little heterosexual sex. But, there are more than 6 billion people, so I don't see how any sound, valid argument can be made that anyone's private sex life is a matter of concern to anyone else.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by New Atheist on December 8, 2010 at 11:01am

Exactly. And even if it came down to that scenario, now that we have the capability of artificial insemination, and test tube babies, it's not like we'd need gays and lesbians to have heterosexual sex to save the population.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 3
• 4
• 5
• Next ›
• Page