It is often accepted that the brain interprets perception picked up by sensory organs; yet when a line is drawn in the hand with a finger, it is the hand that feels, not the brain or the back of the neck where the nerves supposedly meet up with the brain. On the other hand, it is possible to perceive in dreams when the sensory organs are not stimulated by any actual physical object. I can conceive of 2 ways to possibly explain this phenomenon, although I concede there may be more complicated systems:

(1) Sensory organ feedback is bi-directional. It picks up external stimuli, sending signals to the brain, but the brain must send a signal back in order to confirm how the stimuli is to be felt. In this case, it is the sensory organ that perceives and aids in sensing, or feeling of the stimuli.

(2) Sensory organs pick up external stimuli, then sends the signal to the brain (1 direction), and it is the brain that then prompts feeling to the appropriate spatial area. In this case, the only function of a sensory organ is to gather external information, and then brain would be capable of imagining feeling outside of the brain.

If either of these are true, then there are consequences.

If (1) is true, then consciousness, even in a state of dreaming, may be impossible if sensory organs were somehow severed from your central nervous system. You would lack any kind of spatial awareness, and unable to induce even imaginary feeling through any of your senses, if sensory organs were required to sense. It may even be impossible to think if you can't imagine sight, sound, feeling, or emotions, which are often basis in which logical symbols arise.

If (2) is true, then it may be possible, if you truly will it, to imagine a sensory feeling in any spatial coordinate, such that you would be able to realistically feel someone touching an object (through timed imagination) 3 yards in front of you because the activation of your sensory organs would not be require to sense. It may also be true that it would be possible to stimulate someone born blind to imagine sight. It may also mean that the brain is capable of self-generating rational thought without prior stimuli.

Views: 55

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

And then throw in the artificial intelligence used by the biological humans.. GM foods.. augmenting ourselves (well I don't touch the shit but) pills of hundreds of flavors.. i.e. xanax/opiates.. stuff that nightmares family'wise imho~ yikes
Even Jeb Bush's own daughter go caught up and surely damaged from xnax etc..

I'm pro knowledge and pro imagination if that makes any sense.. w/o imagination or if you let it dwell u get crazy -peace!

We're kinda like cyborgs just for using this site to collect our thoughts !? ; )


Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon


Nexus on Social Media:

Latest Activity

Michael Penn commented on Dyslexic's DOG's blog post Most Christian Apologists Attacking Atheism are themselves Frauds!
14 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion E. O. Wilson interview on reducing the role of religion.
34 minutes ago
sk8eycat replied to Allen Dudley's discussion I Wouldn't Call Him "Doctor"
34 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Playing Against Your Computer
37 minutes ago
Darren Taggart posted a video

Jesus God News 26 Feminism Special

Xanadu has had to go into hospital for a... minor procedure. We have a stand in though - be gentle, it's her first time and she's family, and has some very f...
38 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to Allen Dudley's discussion I Wouldn't Call Him "Doctor"
45 minutes ago
sk8eycat replied to Allen Dudley's discussion I Wouldn't Call Him "Doctor"
46 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to James G. Lee's discussion The Death Penalty aka Capital Punishment
55 minutes ago

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service