Where/who does it originate from?
Confucius? Hillel? Socrates? WHO/WHERE?

Views: 39

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

nice one. ;]
Here's a thought experiment.

It's hard to argue with most variations of the golden rule - the attitudes seem so obviously progressive and liberal-minded. As Harry Gensler, http://www.jcu.edu/philosophy/gensler/goldrule.htm, suggests it provides a test of consistent attitudes towards others and less so advice for specific situations. To me it's closer to the traditional Greek idea of virtue ethics (qualities of a 'good' person) rather than the utilitarian and deontological ethical approaches more popular in recent times. (There has been some revival of virtue ethics though).

I wonder how one would apply the golden rule (e.g. "Treat others only as you consent to being treated in the same situation.") to the following circumstance. Families of a local community are arguing over whether or not to allow creationism (or ID) to be taught in public school classes outside of religious instruction, essentially in competition with evolution. All families believe in the veracity of their positions. The conservative Christian families truly believe that revealed knowledge of God via the bible and churches takes precedence over that from human-based sciences. They see God's word as obviously more important than man's, so to speak, and should be given to all. The more secular families including moderated Christians feel the evidence from science is overwhelming and that to teach otherwise would put their children at a severe disadvantage. The two sets of families are at logger heads.

I'm curious on how one would proceed with the golden rule in mind?

Alex
Simple. The secular thinker says: Ok, we can teach your religion if we also teach about Allah, Jehovah, Shiva, Christna, Zeus, Thor, Satan, and every other form of worship currently in the United States.

That will shut them up pretty quickly. I'm sure they'd rather debate with only creationism than having to put up with every religion that has ever existed.
Amen.
It came up in all those places independently of each other. Reciprocation isn't a super brilliant idea, it's fairly simple and it's not surprising that people with the free time to think could derive it.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

MJ

Latest Activity

Joan Denoo replied to roland707's discussion Thoughts on Buddhism?
33 minutes ago
Pat replied to James M. Martin's discussion World Wrestling's Steve Austin on Why Same Sex Couples Should be Allowed to Marry
47 minutes ago
Warren Jappe commented on Steve Shives's video
1 hour ago
Warren Jappe posted a video

It's good to be anti-Islam

...but not anti-Muslim. Christians burned alive, beheaded, crucified and tortured to death http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/christians-are-being-bur...
1 hour ago
Pat replied to Raj's discussion Bible: all laws must be obeyed
1 hour ago
Pat replied to Polaroidxxx's discussion Atheist Confetti
1 hour ago
John Jubinsky added a discussion to the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
2 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Steph S.'s discussion Noah movie religious controversy
2 hours ago
Sentient Biped replied to Raj's discussion Bible: all laws must be obeyed
3 hours ago
Loren Miller replied to Polaroidxxx's discussion Atheist Confetti
3 hours ago
Steve Shives posted a video

Chapters Eleven and Twelve - An Atheist Reads Simply Christian

The examination of N.T. Wright's Simply Christian continues with a look at Chapter Eleven: Worship, and Chapter Twelve: Prayer.
4 hours ago
booklover replied to James M. Martin's discussion World Wrestling's Steve Austin on Why Same Sex Couples Should be Allowed to Marry
4 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service