"They mistake logic with internal consistency.
If you show a theist that his views are internally inconsistent, you will have some measure of success. He will make a good faith (ha!) effort at modifying his views to make them more internally…"
 |
The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
Take Responsibility For Your Beliefs!
I'm having an epic email discussion over at my blog.
Helen wants to save me, of course.
I told her I thought that the idea of hell made God a sort of monster, and I explained it pretty thoroughly.
Well, now of course, she says God doesn't want me to go to hell, etc. etc.
I asked her who made the rule that if I don't love God I go to hell.
First email: you don't have to love god, you have to believe in Jesus.
OK, who made THAT rule?
Next: It's when you blaspheme, you go to hell.
OK, who made THAT rule?
Next: (finally) Not God. You chose to go to hell because you don't believe in Jesus.
(Not the answer to the same question, of course, but ok.)
Who provided the 2 choices? Who is offering the two options?
I am trying to squeeze it out of her. By admitting that God has ultimate responsibility for the suffering in hell, I think she has to take responsibility for finding that eternal torture to be just and right.
And by doing that, I want her to understand, just a little bit, why I do not worship her favorite God.
It's just taking a lot of influence. I may need a waterboard. Anyone have one cheap?
Helen wants to save me, of course.
I told her I thought that the idea of hell made God a sort of monster, and I explained it pretty thoroughly.
Well, now of course, she says God doesn't want me to go to hell, etc. etc.
I asked her who made the rule that if I don't love God I go to hell.
First email: you don't have to love god, you have to believe in Jesus.
OK, who made THAT rule?
Next: It's when you blaspheme, you go to hell.
OK, who made THAT rule?
Next: (finally) Not God. You chose to go to hell because you don't believe in Jesus.
(Not the answer to the same question, of course, but ok.)
Who provided the 2 choices? Who is offering the two options?
I am trying to squeeze it out of her. By admitting that God has ultimate responsibility for the suffering in hell, I think she has to take responsibility for finding that eternal torture to be just and right.
And by doing that, I want her to understand, just a little bit, why I do not worship her favorite God.
It's just taking a lot of influence. I may need a waterboard. Anyone have one cheap?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Rev Hellbound Alleee on -
I asked her who supplies the choices; she said "God did." I thanked her for finally admitting it.
I replied with an analogy of God being like a candidate who sends voters for the other candidate to a prison with torture. I told her we have to take responsibility for the implications of our beliefs.
I'm waiting for another response. Of course she must know I was trying to trap her, otherwise she wouldn't have been so evasive.
-
Permalink Reply by Goz on -
Ii agree with you.
Would a good,just,all loving god create a place such as hell and send people and unborn children there?
I think not.
-
Permalink Reply by J.M. on -
My usual angle on these discussions is a bit different. I find theists to be extremely evasive about the whole "if god this, then that" thing. They manage to justify it all with a bunch of nonsense from their nonsense text, so then we get down to the more immediate issue. Why does she believe in god in the first place? or in the bible? Has anyone other than another human being ever told her she has to? Who told them to believe in god? If the same people told her something more difficult to believe, like "tomorrow your cat will turn into a glass of water", would she believe it? Why or why not? She uses her reasoning to decide what to believe all the time, why would she suspend that use when it comes to something as important as instructions by which she must live her life?
...and go from there.
Theists are so weird. Good luck.
CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Richard Haynes replied to Loren Miller's discussion Latest Activity?"I believe we have almost everything complete. Does anyone notice any other problems?"
blue pashmina commented on Randall Smith's blog post The Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LP3Zs_V_BQ
I'm sure you have seen this already because everyone is talking about it, but this lady made my day. I think she was really classy! :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LP3Zs_V_BQ
"
Steph S. commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"Melinda that's so nice of your mom to support your daughter in her decision to focus on her classes. Did she already start summer school?
Joan we are here to support you and you are in our thoughts.
Happy hump day to you too Melinda!"
Wyatt posted a blog postTheists, Cargo Cults, and Logic
So tired of religious apologists asking me to show evidence for the non-existence of their particular god. I've asked them how they would go about showing evidence for the non-existence of the dragon in Carl Sagan's garage or Russell's celestial teapot. They assert that the analogy is false, but don't explain how. They use words like 'logic' or 'inference' as if they were magic charms without fully understanding what these words mean. It's not unlike superstitious primitives from a cargo cult…See More
Joan Denoo commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"With that last blast to you on Atheist Nexus, I go to chemo therapy and will be there about five hours as they drain a little bit of poison at a time into my body. I welcome it with gratitude and appreciation for the researchers who look for the…"
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
