With the presidential election four months away, the Super Pacs are beginning to turn their attention towards newer digital technologies that allow political campaigns to tightly target their messages to key voters in the swing states.
Facebook, Twitter and Google are all now employing dedicated teams to work directly with the Super Pacs in an attempt to help them build internet presence.
Google has three separate teams of skilled political campaigners working on the 2012 election – one liases with the Democratic campaigns, one with Republicans, and the third works with what it calls "independent expenditure groups", largely the Super Pacs.
They operate a strict firewall, Google says, between the independent expenditure team and the other two, in line with campaign finance laws that bar Super Pacs from co-ordinating directly with political candidates or parties.
Sean Harrison, who runs Google's Super PAC operation, is a former Republican campaign manager who used to work for Citizens United, the organisation that leant its name to the controversial supreme court judgment that unleashed a flood of private money into this year's election cycle.
"When you look at online advertising, one of the fastest growth areas is politics, and within politics one of the fastest growth areas are the independent expenditure groups and Super Pacs," Harrison said.
=
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/29/conservative-super-pacs...
Permalink Reply by Sentient Biped on June 30, 2012 at 9:34pm Hate to say it, but I think this elections is already bought and paid for. Welcome to The United Plutocracy of America.
Permalink Reply by booklover on July 1, 2012 at 10:30am I know Sentient. I agree. I think it's sick. I don't think the Founding Fathers intended anyone to BUY the presidency.
You are right Sentient and booklover - now the corporations buy the presidency using their lobbyists.
It really sick indeed.
Permalink Reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on July 1, 2012 at 10:50am
Permalink Reply by Sentient Biped on July 1, 2012 at 12:08pm What I don't understand is why plutocracy is not a campaign issue. I understand the Democrats not jumping on it too much, because they have rick donors too. But I would still like to see the megacorps and billionaires taken to task for their mind-boggling financial role in the elections.
Permalink Reply by jay H on July 21, 2012 at 6:48am Chris Breman Online
Stuart M Rees Online

Richard Haynes Online

Loren Miller Online

Posted by Larry Taylor on May 20, 2013 at 8:15pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
OK. I am venting. My mother died two weeks ago. She was a “god fearing christian.” Before her death she refused all medical treatment. She wanted to be left alone. She even refused to speak with my brother who is a methodist minister. He is a pip, let me tell you! I suspect she did not believe, but a woman born in her time could not and did not state her actual beliefs. This is the opening salvo to all christians; FUCK YOU! I had so many people come and tell…
ContinuePosted by Christy Stewart on May 20, 2013 at 2:17pm 6 Comments 0 Likes
This probably should not have shocked me as much as it did (especially since I am in Texas). I actually thought my coworkers were playing a joke on me because they know I am an atheist. Sadly, this was no joke. This actually happened.
I work in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who admit patients are general MDs. (Psychiatrists see patients after admission) Yesterday evening we received several calls from irate parents. A new doctor who was doing admissions yesterday actually…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 1:09pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this,
Nathan Young,
No Jason Torpy it is you that should be banned for promoting atheism, a belief that has no foundation in reality and zero proof behind it. The letter was a mockery of your atheist beliefs. I request to the board here that they remove Jason for his unverifiable beliefs in atheism for which he has no proof other than his arrogance. The letter was a mockery of atheism. Atheism is stupid and it should be mocked and it…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 12:42pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this Facebook comment?
Nathan Young to Jason Torpy,
for once you and I can agree on something. We should disrespect beliefs that are untenable such as the belief that there is no God. Indeed for me to respect you Jason, I cannot respect your belief in non-belief in atheism. Your atheism comes across as arrogrance, smugness, and self righteous. Indeed after reading "An Open Letter to My Religious Friends" I penned one…
ContinueAdded by Loren Miller 0 Comments 1 Like
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.