Romney's tax plan has never been spelled out completely. It starts with a 20% across the board cut for everyone. That is where Obama gets the $5 trillion revenue loss figure, but Romney says he will make the cuts revenue neutral by eliminating deductions, refusing to specify which.

That's where the problem lies. Some taxpayers have a lot of deductions and might see an increase in their taxes, while others with few deductions would get a large tax cut. It might average out, but you don't want to be on the wrong side of that averaging.

What's missing from the discussion is that any tax plan will have to be passed by Congress. Many deductions are aimed at certain businesses. The housing and real estate lobbies will argue fiercely against eliminating the deduction for home mortgage interest and that is a big one—for many taxpayers, their largest deduction. State and local income taxes are a big deduction in some states, but not in others. Where income tax is high the Congressional delegations from those states will vote against eliminating the deduction and Romney may not get the support of his party on that one.

Voters may well go for the 20% income tax cut, not realizing what they could lose in deductions. As long as Romney refuses to tell, he may win votes. The clincher is that the Tax Policy Center claims that no combination of eliminated deductions adds up to enough to allow a 20% tax cut. Analysts who disagree rely on a large increase in economic growth to offset the shortfall.

Views: 147

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I swear too much Steph. lol.

You are just great booklover! : )

 

So are you Steph! :)

Swear more.  Please.

I will if that fucker Romney wins! ;)

Yeah it's fantasy Jonathan

The Tax Policy Center has published a new table showing the effects of capping deductions at either $17,000, $25,000, or $50,000 or eliminating them completely. None of these options provide enough revenue to make up for a 20% cut in rates. It's not even close.

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?DocID=3590

There really is no way a reasonable person could accept Romney's proposals as anything but ilogical. I actually believe that Romney knows his "tax plan" is a joke. He can't be that stupid. He's just counting on lots of people being stupid enough to fall for his trick.

Any detailed discussion of taxes soon surpasses the capacity of most. Our mind-boggling tax code is extraordinarily complex and full of favors to various segments. Here is a discussion of what the numbers mean, but it is still not made entirely clear because it does not discuss cuts to other taxes that Romney proposes.

http://taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org/2012/10/17/how-much-revenue-would...

And unfortunately many people are stupid Jonathan.

That's true, there are legions of morons in the country who vote; however, when the nitty gritty of tax policy gets into the discussion even the intelligent citizen's eyes glaze over.  Mitten's economic plan is bullshit and he knows it - if he doesn't then his "business cred" is a joke.  But then, Mittens has switched hats so many times who knows what he actually means or thinks?

Mittens also claims to believe that Joseph Smith shit, so maybe he IS that stupid.  Or maybe really devious.  Either way I can't stand the thought of him being our president.  We will be a laughing-stock.

RSS

CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS

Latest Activity

Joan Denoo commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
"11:00 PM had my first bout of nausea; Rx took care of it. I feel wonderful. Absolutely no pain, I can't finish a sentence or remember words so Cary, Laura and Laurie did their best to understand what I am trying to convey. I usually get enough…"
1 hour ago
John Hutcheson posted a blog post

Are the media too giddy over the Pope?

With all the media attention the on the Pope, important stories are being missed, human rights violations, Monsanto protection act, Russia march to blasphemy laws, and of the big story this week did Harry Potter vanquish dementors?See More
2 hours ago
Ian Mason commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
"The medical profession seems to have improved in some areas at least. Personally I think some of that is due to the higher level of education of society as a whole. We know too much to put up with bad treatment now. I saw a documentary last year…"
2 hours ago
Ian Mason commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
2 hours ago
Nerdlass replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Cicadas taste like asparagus in the group THE KNIFE & FORK
"Thanks. Now I have "Glory of Love" stuck in my head. ^^; I'm not sure if I could get used to eating bugs. It's like... if they're mudbugs or sea-bugs, that's one thing, but it's hard to imagine them tasting good…"
2 hours ago
Nerdlass commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Some Wiccans and their seeking approval from Christians
"I converted to paganism (through wicca, but didn't stay there) from xianity. During that conversion period, I tried to reconcile the beliefs, which ultimately, I couldn't. There are some who find a way (probably used to cherry picking, so…"
2 hours ago
Hiram replied to Hiram's discussion Epicureanism: a Secular Doctrine for Happiness
"There are currently two Gardens of Epicurus: one in Chicago and one in New Jersey.  Please visit if you're in the vecinity!"
3 hours ago
Hiram commented on Maruli Marulaki's group Epicurean Atheists
"There are currently two Gardens of Epicurus: one in Chicago and one in New Jersey.  Please visit if you're in the vecinity!"
3 hours ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service