Atheist Nexus

The World’s Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!

Romney's tax plan has never been spelled out completely. It starts with a 20% across the board cut for everyone. That is where Obama gets the $5 trillion revenue loss figure, but Romney says he will make the cuts revenue neutral by eliminating deductions, refusing to specify which.

That's where the problem lies. Some taxpayers have a lot of deductions and might see an increase in their taxes, while others with few deductions would get a large tax cut. It might average out, but you don't want to be on the wrong side of that averaging.

What's missing from the discussion is that any tax plan will have to be passed by Congress. Many deductions are aimed at certain businesses. The housing and real estate lobbies will argue fiercely against eliminating the deduction for home mortgage interest and that is a big one—for many taxpayers, their largest deduction. State and local income taxes are a big deduction in some states, but not in others. Where income tax is high the Congressional delegations from those states will vote against eliminating the deduction and Romney may not get the support of his party on that one.

Voters may well go for the 20% income tax cut, not realizing what they could lose in deductions. As long as Romney refuses to tell, he may win votes. The clincher is that the Tax Policy Center claims that no combination of eliminated deductions adds up to enough to allow a 20% tax cut. Analysts who disagree rely on a large increase in economic growth to offset the shortfall.

Views: 147

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I swear too much Steph. lol.

You are just great booklover! : )

 

So are you Steph! :)

Swear more.  Please.

I will if that fucker Romney wins! ;)

Yeah it's fantasy Jonathan

The Tax Policy Center has published a new table showing the effects of capping deductions at either $17,000, $25,000, or $50,000 or eliminating them completely. None of these options provide enough revenue to make up for a 20% cut in rates. It's not even close.

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?DocID=3590

There really is no way a reasonable person could accept Romney's proposals as anything but ilogical. I actually believe that Romney knows his "tax plan" is a joke. He can't be that stupid. He's just counting on lots of people being stupid enough to fall for his trick.

Any detailed discussion of taxes soon surpasses the capacity of most. Our mind-boggling tax code is extraordinarily complex and full of favors to various segments. Here is a discussion of what the numbers mean, but it is still not made entirely clear because it does not discuss cuts to other taxes that Romney proposes.

http://taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org/2012/10/17/how-much-revenue-would...

And unfortunately many people are stupid Jonathan.

That's true, there are legions of morons in the country who vote; however, when the nitty gritty of tax policy gets into the discussion even the intelligent citizen's eyes glaze over.  Mitten's economic plan is bullshit and he knows it - if he doesn't then his "business cred" is a joke.  But then, Mittens has switched hats so many times who knows what he actually means or thinks?

Mittens also claims to believe that Joseph Smith shit, so maybe he IS that stupid.  Or maybe really devious.  Either way I can't stand the thought of him being our president.  We will be a laughing-stock.

RSS

Support Nexus

Click to Buy Amazon items and help A|N

Advertisements

Heathen's Guide

Your Ad Here

Helpful Items

 

Search Atheist Nexus:
Translate page:
 
Social Networking Links:
 

Latest Activity

James Yount commented on Steph S.'s group Geek & Nerd Haven
6 minutes ago
Richard C Brown commented on Dallas the Phallus's group HUMANE ATHEISTS
40 minutes ago
Sentient Biped replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
1 hour ago
Sentient Biped replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
1 hour ago
Loren Miller posted a video

Why Call Him God?

When should an omnipotent, omniscient, benevolent Being be expected to do anything god-like? Here's our take on the subject.
1 hour ago
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
1 hour ago
Rachel Riley commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo commented on Joan Denoo's group Politics, Economics, and Religion
1 hour ago
Nerdlass replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
2 hours ago
Napoleon Bonaparte posted videos
2 hours ago
Jerry Wesner replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
3 hours ago
Mathew T. replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary
3 hours ago
Mathew T. replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary
3 hours ago
Mathew T. replied to Jessica's discussion Just an interesting observation
3 hours ago
Mathew T. replied to Jessica's discussion Just an interesting observation
3 hours ago
Joan Denoo commented on Joan Denoo's album
3 hours ago
booklover commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
4 hours ago
Napoleon Bonaparte commented on Rick Goodner's video
4 hours ago
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion The Mystery of the "Immaculately" Conceived Baby Anteater in the group Wildlife
5 hours ago
Chris Haughey replied to Joe S.'s discussion Intergroup Intelligentsia - The Thought Police in the group Atheists, Addictions, 12 Step Recovery, and Alternatives
5 hours ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service