
Tags: The End of the World
Permalink Reply by booklover on May 10, 2011 at 5:12pm lol I bet you don't get many takers! hey! Why is Sarah Palin, etc. bothering with politics when she/they won't be here anyway?
Permalink Reply by matt warren on May 10, 2011 at 5:39pm
Permalink Reply by Gwaithmir on May 13, 2011 at 12:34am
Permalink Reply by Rob Robinson on May 13, 2011 at 3:45pm Good riddance. That's 100 million people who no longer knock on my door and place goofy fishes on their cars :)
And yes, I know this guys a loon. But the people who follow him will just need a incomprehensibly worded excuse from the preacher and they'll still believe in mumbo jumbo.
Permalink Reply by Hazel H. on May 13, 2011 at 3:46pm
Permalink Reply by booklover on May 13, 2011 at 8:10pm I was thinking that myself Hazel! :) There will unfortunately be other religious loons left according to the fundies though, but at least some of the dumb will be gone.
Permalink Reply by Jameer Logan on May 14, 2011 at 1:32am
Permalink Reply by coffeycake on May 14, 2011 at 8:59pm There's a billboard with the same message a few miles away from me. I'll see if I can't drive up tomorrow to take a picture of it. If I can, I'll post it.
I'd love to join them in being Raptured and all, but I'll be too busy. Such a shame. If they'd let me know earlier, I could have been available, but, you know, May is such a busy month for me. Do you think if I pray really hard, god will reschedule to a date that works better for me? After all, he does say "ask and ye shall receive..."
In all seriousness, there are people who have quit their jobs and are living on their savings in such a way that they won't have any money left on the 22nd. The Washington Post article mentioned one couple who has done so - and they have a young daughter and the woman is pregnant with another child due in June.
I guess the angels and saints are able to deliver children, but then that child will automatically go to hell since it can't actually accept Jesus into its heart before it's pre-verbal. But of course the article and the parents didn't mention that.
Permalink Reply by coffeycake on May 14, 2011 at 9:28pm Sorry, quick correction. The article that mentions the family with the two-year-old and the pregnant woman is on Unreasonable Faith, not the Washington Post. (Or, if it is mentioned in the Post article, that isn't where I originally saw it.)
The article I was referencing can be found here:
Sorry about that! I try to be better about my facts but sometimes they slip through.
Permalink Reply by Joy Cody on May 16, 2011 at 5:16pm
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Loren Miller replied to John Hutcheson's discussion Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, Who's playing?
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Breitbart Group Claims "New Evidence" Hitler Was Gay in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.