I have heard from a lot of religious people that "Science and religion goes hand in hand". I do not agree with this because religion is based on super natural beliefs that goes against scientific evidence. Now if you are religious and you believe in science, that is one thing. But you cannot say that your religion has anything to do with science or that it supports it. Religion is perhaps a pseudo-science that has failed us tremendously, it has made people turn their backs against modern science and it has only strengthen their extremely delusional beliefs. But if you say this, then religious people will say "Wow, you are arrogant!", but then what is wrong with being arrogant when you are right?
But what do you think? Do you think that religion and science shares anything in common? And what do you think about people who claims they do?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Madhukar Kulkarni on November 16, 2011 at 4:29am Gallileo laid the foundation for modern science and one only has to take a look at history to know how he was treated by religion. Religious people did not learn any lesson from the fact that Gallileo had the last laugh. They also opposed Darwin and have been proved wrong again. They still want to believe that man was created by god and that the earth is 6400 tears old. In a country like America, where there is an agency like NASA, there is a Young Earth movement that does everything to oppose modern scientific theory of the birth of the universe. In this respect, the muslims appear only better because they are trying to prove that all that science says is in the Quoran! With this lone exception, religion always appears to be as distant from science as hell and heaven!
Madhukar Kulkarni.
Permalink Reply by paul babcock on November 16, 2011 at 7:48am
Permalink Reply by Roger B. on November 20, 2011 at 8:26pm Interpretations of holy texts change as new scientific discoveries are made and eventually accepted by the majority of people. Look at how few people still believe in a literal six-day creation because of the overwhelming evidence of the universe being 13.7 billion years old and the Earth being 4.5 billion. In the end they have to be really vague so that they're not as easily disproven, and I've heard some laughable attempts of explaining inconsistencies and absurdities, like the Jehova's Witness view of creation being from the perspective of a hypothetical human that would have been on Earth at the time, which is why day and night would be seen before the sun.
Permalink Reply by Jimmy Hilli on November 21, 2011 at 12:11am Still, 44 % of the US population does not believe in evolution and they also believe that the earth is younger than 10 000 years. Then 39 % believes in evolution, but that it was directed by god and then we have 10 % who believes in an evolution without god. But these statistics may be inaccurate.
Permalink Reply by Mahesh Kalindu on December 7, 2012 at 4:39am yes i agree with you, Science and religion can never go hand in hand. question is what is religion. religion is basically about believing in a personal god. but what is science. science is what that proves the existence of a god is a lie.
No matter what our religious beliefs are, at the end of the day no one can survive without Science but we can without Religion. and i truly think without religion world would be a better place. people need to understand what science truly is, and how to be Good or Evil. and the morals. read the below article that explains what is science and how it affects Good and Evil and Human Condition.
Permalink Reply by DarkBlack on December 11, 2012 at 1:04pm Science and religion are not even compatible (I started a discussion on that, on this forum, if you're curious) it has to do with confilcting foundations or first principles. I "de-converted" as soon as I tried considering the idea of god as a scientific hypotesis (credit to Dawkins for the idea).
More to the topic. As far as I remember from when I was religious, the idea is that science shows god's glory by revealing the complexity of the universe. It requires that one believes god created evernthing to impress.
I can think of one thing were science and religion have something in common (sort of). Religion may have (in some cases) have started due (in part) to a quest for knowledge (or answers), e.g. why is there a volcano and how does it work? The religious answer will involve pele, hephistus or similar. In other words the idea that religion is our first attempt at understanding the world.
Debra Stevenson replied to Loren Miller's discussion When Christians become a 'hated minority' (John Blake, CNN)
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Steph S.'s discussion Whose tech is better: 'Star Trek' or 'Star Wars'? in the group Geek & Nerd Haven
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Alexandra's discussion Need help with irreducible complexity
Ramon Rego MD replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Harvard Dissertation Claims. "Hispanic low IQ" / Immigration Policy in the group Race, Ethnicity, & Culture
Loren Miller replied to Loren Miller's discussion When Christians become a 'hated minority' (John Blake, CNN)
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Loren Miller's discussion When Christians become a 'hated minority' (John Blake, CNN)© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

