October 30, 2011

What Americans, and humanity, are facing in the foreseeable future:

As I sit here now, quite sick actually, on this early football-Sunday afternoon in New Jersey, something extraordinary has happened. It is October 30th, 2011, and we are in a declared state of emergency following the first winter storm of the season. My yard, and the yards of my neighbors, are covered both with snow and a remarkable amount of debris from the winds which blew last night, knocking down whole limbs of trees. A large branch hangs suspended on the electrical wires of my next-door neighbor's house and the tree in my front yard. All last night it sounded as if someone were banging on my roof with a hammer as the winds blew the boughs of my trees against my suburban house. It is only the last week of October, and yet we are experiencing storms we wouldn't usually expect until the dead of winter. Something is amiss.

This is clearly the work of global warming. This sounds counterintuitive; why would global warming make winter storms harsher? Well, all that melting snow from the polar icecaps has got to go somewhere. Yes, much of it melts directly into the oceans, but some of it gets carried through the air, and some more of what has melted into the oceans gets evaporated during the intensified heat of the year, creating a wetter atmosphere and more extreme weather patterns year-round.

As many of my fellow Americans are getting themselves primed for a day-long marathon of mid-season American football games (with all their important play-off implications), largely ignorant and oblivious to the worsening conditions we are all facing in a rapidly-changing world, my mind is on the political climate. We in America largely take our way of life for granted, but as we are at this very moment approaching the 7 billion people mark, 40% of the world's population is trying to live off of less that $2 a day, and 850 million people (that's about 1/8th of all people) are underfed or going hungry. These numbers are only trending worse, but there is more, much more to worry about.

Photosynthesis provides the backbone for almost all life on this planet, including us. It is the “primary economy of the planet”. And while humans surprisingly compose only 0.5% of all the biomass on the earth, we consume 31% of all the products of earth's photosynthesis! This is unsustainable. Also, 1/3 of the earth's arable land is used to grow feed for animals to be exported to the developed world, with this number also rapidly growing as nations like China increase their demands to live as we do in the West. The pressure being exerted upon the world's poor is enormous, and almost completely unconsidered by fat and greedy Westerners. We support a system which devotes arable land to feeding cattle while virtually half of all the people on the planet are struggling just to feed themselves. And this is to say nothing about water and energy shortages, or carbon footprints, or pollution, to name just a few more of the pressures facing humanity, not to mention the all-too-easily-forgotten other species which also happen to inhabit the planet.

As the Occupy Wall st. protests across America, and indeed around the globe, struggle to have their voices heard and to convey a clear message, the problem of greed is clearly a very central aspect to this message. And while Americans are fighting joblessness and wealth disparity, the rest of the world is undoubtedly looking at America with a profound sense of dismay. We cannot continue down the path of overconsumption, and yet we have taken precious few steps towards adjusting our behavior or life-styles towards a more sustainable future. While we should be leading the world in creating scientific, and indeed social, solutions for improving the lot of humanity, we cannot even get our population to acknowledge the scientific facts of evolution or global warming. Half of our population is still caught up in the Christian world-view that we live in a benevolent world in which we are meant to rule over nature, consume the earth's plenty, and be fruitful and multiply. Such thinking is ill-suited to a growing crisis of global shortages of every imaginable kind.

It seems then that the voice of the secular left is growing louder and is becoming increasingly more relevant. If we cannot all live on this planet like Americans do, we can live on this planet like our bankers do, like our 1% do, even less. We need to adjust our behavior as Americans, and as humans, dramatically if we are even to survive, let alone if we are to behave as moral, responsible caretakers of the world we inhabit. Social unrest is only going to increase until we get ourselves motivated for the immense task at hand of saving our planet and our own species. America needs to lead the way towards a sustainable future for not just Americans but for all of humanity. We need to begin to take the moral high ground which we are abdicating by simple virtue of the fact that we do nothing to change the trajectory of human history.

The way we do this is through efficiency. We need to work towards energy efficiency, water efficiency, food-supply efficiency, and carbon-emission efficiency. We need to work towards economic efficiency as well, and this necessitates a much more egalitarian distribution of resources across all walks of life. We can no longer allow a small percentage of our population to command the lion's share of resources and complacently permit them to engorge themselves on the earth's resources to the detriment of anyone and everyone else. We need to organize ourselves in radically new ways around these ideas. This could create the jobs we are lacking and kick-start the economy which languishes in out-of-date methodologies and inefficient strategies. Efficiency should become the rallying-cry of the progressive movement.

The other side to this coin which stymies much thinking is the problem of overpopulation. Just as we need to invest more in our country and tax the rich more in addition to spending cuts to inefficient programs in order to straighten out our national debt, so we need to reduce reproductive pressures on the environment in addition to streamlining our social behaviors and increasing our efficiency as a society. Efficiency is a rallying cry towards that end as well, and should be our primary concern as we struggle to come up with whatever solutions seem appropriate for addressing this perplexing problem.

If we on the left do not get our act together and fight for what we know is right and good, we abdicate our responsibility and our morality to each other and to ourselves. If we continue down this path, we allow the powerful but few to justify their behavior as being done out of self-interest, whether this means using force to dominate the few remaining resources left to protect the American “way of life”, or arriving at the logical conclusion of exclusive selfishness, going to war with the rest of the world and letting our problems be settled according to the laws of nature. We must put an end to the “we are all out for ourselves” mentality which has corrupted our society and which threatens to soon dominate the world and the minds of men, leading us all to the Hobbesian state of nature of all against all, which would indeed make all our lives “nasty, brutish, and short”.

Views: 262

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sadly, I have to agree.  We will see what happens when a species exceeds the carrying capacity of its environment. In many parts of the world, principally 3rd world countries, the conditions we see today in the Horn of Africa will afflict half of the population of the planet . No amount of "emergency" aid will diminish that level of human misery. Available unpolluted water will be available to only the wealthier nations - water borne disease will become rampant, striking with a fury those weakened by starvation. That will happen if everything else in the environment stabilizes - if other things get worse it will intensify the misery.
Starving people will take drastic measures to find food for their family, drastic measures which will feed growing chaos and violence.
I can't think of anything that is technological and politically possible. We may hit 20 billion on the planet but within a decade after that it will be 5 to 6 billion.

Sadly, I have to agree.  We will see what happens when a species exceeds the carrying capacity of its environment. In many parts of the world, principally 3rd world countries, the conditions we see today in the Horn of Africa will afflict half of the population of the planet . No amount of "emergency" aid will diminish that level of human misery. Available unpolluted water will be available to only the wealthier nations - water borne disease will become rampant, striking with a fury those weakened by starvation. That will happen if everything else in the environment stabilizes - if other things get worse it will intensify the misery.
Starving people will take drastic measures to find food for their family, drastic measures which will feed growing chaos and violence.
I can't think of anything that is technological and politically possible that will alter that possiblity. We may hit 20 billion on the planet but within a decade after that it will be 5 to 6 billion.

Some countries can sustain a large population and it's usually the poorest countries which have large and growing populations. World religions such as catholicism encourage population growth while China has taken effective measures in a one child policy.

The worlds population is growing at a faster and faster rate and will continue to do so in our life-times. We are becoming verminous toward the planet and other life. It's a big problem for future generations and governments need to address it now.

Who knows what will happen in the future. Will the human population be culled by natural factors such as famine or disease ? It's futuristic.

If overpopulation causes us to pursue space colonization I'm all for it ^^
Why?????? Will Faithless Sophia?  So, we can destroy another planet?  If I were a member of an advanced space flying civilization, I would pinch each earth spaceship between my fingers so we don't get two feet off this planet.  We must solve our man made problems here before we just trash the planet, have the rich fly off, and leave the rest to suffer.  And, what about the other earthlings?  Our fellow animals?  What? F+_%$#@K them?
Ya know. It isn't necessarily a given that we would destroy another planet lol. The state of our planet currently is a result of discovery+greed lol. And of course some people would be left behind on the planet, otherwise what's the point of colonization? This planet can very well recover, we just have to stop overburdening it.
It's more likely that people would build big rafts and colonize the oceans, or at least the inlets.  Any space colonization would be done by small teams of astronauts.  Even if all the technology existed, and we had a place to go, large scale space migration like in the movies would never be economical.  War would always be cheaper.
Now I could very well be wrong in this, but could one of our problems as humans be our lifespans not matching up with our breeding potential? being able to have 1 or 2 kids a year is okay if the life span is around 40-50 years, but now that we have people regularly living past 100, but our gestation period (per se) hasn't changed at all. (For the record I've been awake for a couple of days now so my apologies if that didn't make any sense
Our lifespans are longer yes compounding the  problem. Have you heard the topic of overpopulation in the news or in politics?  Rarely.   People are unaware or do not care about too many people on the earth. Not until the natural resources become scarce will they notice.
Well it is a scary predicament to be in. and attempting to get people to only stick to 1 or 2 kids depending on their area makes us sound too much like the scary scary communists who live across the ocean lol.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service