There seems to be a re-occuring 10% number as the % of people who grab what they can for themselves with no interest in the long term consequences and they are as tough as bed-bugs to eradicate. Historically they cause misery chaos or stagnation. ( No they are not to be confused with good ol' Republicans regulated by a socialist reformed soceity beginning of 20th century until 1980)
Surely the scientific community needs to diagnose our 10% as the socio-paths they are. Just as psychotic or scizophrenia.etc.....
If there is bi-polar 1 that is brain-chemically loopy but a bi-polar 2 for people who pass for abit moody but are normal enough I don't see the problem with humanity diagnosing what passes for normal accepted behaviour as a scientifically recognised genetic mental disability. Is it true this 10% could exist in apes?
Since 90% of us are the true normal isn't it about time to diagnose abnormal than shrug and say its the human condition. I really don't think they can HELP it which is the criteria for mental imbalance.
Quite beside religion as superstition the 10% are actively infiltrated in using religion as a tool for control.Seems to be if you can control the masses you can make em pay for the priveledge too.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Mike Hungerford on November 18, 2012 at 2:12am
Loren Miller posted a status
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Nick Walker posted a status
Loren Miller replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
James M. Martin replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Richard Goscicki replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Dennis Michael Pennington replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Daily Show takes on Christian persecution© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

