Not counting the first 8 years (blame those on my parents - when I could think rationally I did), I have been a life-long atheist. I put that right in my profile ALWAYS. So why is it almost every message I get is from someone who claims to be an xtian? I understand it from the people who just message me with a "hi" or a "let's hook up" (they can't read big words), but from people who have an otherwise nice and interesting profile or people who obviosly read mine thoroughly..I just don't get it.
If your profile says "Christian and quite serious about it" why would you try to date an "atheist and quite serious about it"?
Do they really think they could convert me this late in the game?
Xtians make no sense to me..
Tags:
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Permalink Reply by Ben Roth on July 15, 2011 at 6:38pm
Permalink Reply by TByte on July 18, 2011 at 12:32am Plenty Of Fish is free, and not deceptive. (OK Cupid was legit at one time as well, but has been purchased by Match so I would not trust it any more).
I got a lot of dates off of OK Cupid, and it was where I met the love of my live a year an a half ago.
I'd say it is atypical for people with a belief in wicca/palm reading/psychics, etc to NOT be scatterbrained. Every person I've met who participated in these particular subcultures was flaky in a way which made them unsuitable for dating. Stay away from them.
Permalink Reply by Secular Forces 2013 on July 17, 2011 at 8:00am
Permalink Reply by Michael Pianko on July 17, 2011 at 11:20pm Rough or painful sex wouldn't exist if circumcision didn't exist. Circumcision is a symptom of a larger problem, the fact that religion hates sex and sex appeal. As Derel Ray explains and as I knew but hadn't thought about enough before, religious people (like my family) get really embarrassed at the mere mention of sex or body parts. They have to refer to sex with silly euphemisms such as marital relations. All my mother could say was that in order to have a kid a man and woman "get together" so I imagined my parents standing with their backs to the refregerator with a foot betwen them and barely looking at each other, then in public school sex education in 9th grade I was quite uncomfortable and thought the topic should not be discussed. But this is how religion viruses often make people think.
Permalink Reply by TByte on July 18, 2011 at 12:29am Rough or painful sex has nothing to do with circumcision.
Michael, you really need to let this particular topic rest for a while, on the forum and certainly in you dating life. It is, for you, an obsession far out of proportion that is poisoning your social life.
Permalink Reply by Craigart14 on October 4, 2011 at 2:09pm
Permalink Reply by Fred W. Hill on July 17, 2011 at 10:40am
Permalink Reply by Brian Forsythe on July 23, 2011 at 1:49pm
Permalink Reply by Kelly M on July 28, 2011 at 8:37pm
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on July 28, 2011 at 8:52pm
paul babcock replied to John Hutcheson's discussion Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, Who's playing?
Joan Denoo replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
paul babcock liked Loren Miller's discussion Morals in Men - Morals in Chimps - Why? (CNN - Kelly Murray)
Joan Denoo replied to James M. Martin's discussion Breitbart Group Claims "New Evidence" Hitler Was Gay in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
Tom Sarbeck replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
The Flying Atheist replied to James M. Martin's discussion St. Anthony Falls Bridge, Minnesota in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
Sentient Biped replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Sentient Biped replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.