Hi,
Just a quick survey regarding what you think your Ontological/essential nature is from the various accounts on Identity/Perosnal Identity.

Who thinks they are an organism/Homo Sapiens, a brain, a Person/mind/ego or a Person constituted by a body/organism/Homo Sapiens. If I have left any out pls add them.

Cheers
Simon

Views: 1

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hmmm. "Personhood" bothers me. I've never been clear about what it is- ethical concept (potential right recipient) or metaphysical (part of philosophy of mind) or linguistic/social convention.

You sound like you've done a lot of work on this. It isn't my area, but it sounds interesting.
IMO this is the main thing to overcome in the abortion debate. It is a matter of identity/ontology. My account overcomes it & works whether you wish to frame us as persons or organisms.
I get the feeling that many pro-choice arguments use a form of category mistake to justify their conclusion. The philosophy of mind version of 'personhood' is not something which embyos and probably at least early fetuses possess. That I'll agree to- but to then say that it has no rights requires that one believe that the set of 'persons' in the philosophy of mind use of the word and the set of 'persons' in the ethical use of the word are coextensive.

It's a question begging argument. Why is there no right to life for a fetus? "Because a fetus doesn't meet the criteria for having rights." That's basically what it boils down to.

If pro-choice advocates had to defend their upholding notion that the two personhood senses denote all and only the same members, then (those who'd thought about) would probably fall back on some sort of utilitarianism. Doing that would even the playing field (if not tilt it in our favor) considering all the objections that there are to utilitarianism.
Connected with the classification as a person is the reason why some Pro-Choice philosophers only see moral value in being a person. Singer and Tooley-+ others- try to link in cognitive sophistication but I don't buy it and see it as a bad attempt to disguise circular reasoning.

RSS

Blog Posts

Death of a family member

Posted by Larry Taylor on May 20, 2013 at 8:15pm 4 Comments

OK. I am venting. My mother died two weeks ago. She was a “god fearing christian.” Before her death she refused all medical treatment. She wanted to be left alone. She even refused to speak with my brother who is a methodist minister. He is a pip, let me tell you! I suspect she did not believe, but a woman born in her time could not and did not state her actual beliefs. This is the opening salvo to all christians; FUCK YOU! I had so many people come and tell…

Continue

Unbelievable!!!!!!!!

Posted by Christy Stewart on May 20, 2013 at 2:17pm 6 Comments

This probably should not have shocked me as much as it did (especially since I am in Texas). I actually thought my coworkers were playing a joke on me because they know I am an atheist. Sadly, this was no joke. This actually happened.

I work in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who admit patients are general MDs. (Psychiatrists see patients after admission) Yesterday evening we received several calls from irate parents. A new doctor who was doing admissions yesterday actually…

Continue

anti-atheist rant from an Orthodox Mormon part 2

Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 1:09pm 0 Comments

What do you think of this,

 

Nathan Young,

 

No Jason Torpy it is you that should be banned for promoting atheism, a belief that has no foundation in reality and zero proof behind it.  The letter was a mockery of your atheist beliefs.  I request to the board here that they remove Jason for his unverifiable beliefs in atheism for which he has no proof other than his arrogance.  The letter was a mockery of atheism.  Atheism is stupid and it should be mocked and it…

Continue

Anti-atheist post from an Orthdox Mormon

Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 12:42pm 3 Comments

 

What do you think of this Facebook comment?

 

 

Nathan Young to Jason Torpy,

 

for once you and I can agree on something.  We should disrespect beliefs that are untenable such as the belief that there is no God.  Indeed for me to respect you Jason, I cannot respect your belief in non-belief in atheism.  Your atheism comes across as arrogrance, smugness, and self righteous.  Indeed after reading "An Open Letter to My Religious Friends" I penned one…

Continue

Events

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service