Tags:
Permalink Reply by John Aultman on November 9, 2011 at 8:18am Good news... Initiative 26 failed
Permalink Reply by Richard K. Emms on November 9, 2011 at 8:25am Right!!
I heard it on the news this morning.
Permalink Reply by booklover on November 9, 2011 at 8:33am Really? Wow, I wasn't giving the people of Mississippi enough credit. I guess I had my own prejudices assuming the majority were religious-nuts. Shows me! SO glad it did not pass. How horrible it was even voted on.
Permalink Reply by Prog Rock Girl on November 9, 2011 at 12:47pm Astronomically good news.
Permalink Reply by Ashleigh Carter on November 9, 2011 at 1:40pm O thank the flying spaghetti monster! This really had me worried. Ramen.
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on November 9, 2011 at 8:49am Something worth noting in all of this: the "Personhood" issue voted on in Mississippi was the product of a Colorado-based group: Personhood USA. According to today's article in CNN, this organization intends to promote similar measures in the future in Florida, Montana and Ohio.
That Personhood USA has already fallen on their face twice - Mississippi and Colorado - is encouraging, but this is no time to take our collective eyes off the ball. In Ohio there is work proceeding on a "heartbeat" bill, which would require women desiring an abortion to be checked for a fetal heartbeat, such heartbeat being grounds for denying the procedure. These guys want to promote a "culture of life," which sounds far more like a christian fundamentalist culture to me.
Let's not give them the chance to gain ANY GROUND.
Permalink Reply by Prog Rock Girl on November 9, 2011 at 12:48pm What state is the most pro-life in the country, I wonder? Mississippi is probably pretty up there, and it failed.
Permalink Reply by John Aultman on November 9, 2011 at 4:13pm Thanks for the head Loren hopefully the other states will follow Mississippi and Colorado's lead.
Permalink Reply by Un-Tarded on November 9, 2011 at 10:30am The bill died this morning 11/08/2011. Good news!
Permalink Reply by Pat on November 9, 2011 at 10:48am True, it did not pass. One of the arguments I heard against is that the language of the proposition was so broad, it would have included frozen embryos used in in vitro fertilization The actual language of the bill was
Be it Enacted by the People of the State of Mississippi: SECTION 1. Article III of the constitution of the state of Mississippi is hereby amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION TO READ: Section 33. Person defined. As used in this Article III of the state constitution, "The term 'person' or 'persons' shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning or the functional equivalent thereof." This initiative shall not require any additional revenue for implementation.
I actually saw an interview with a devout Christian couple who were going to vote against it since they reasoned (correctly) that it would have prohibited them from using science based fertilization methods to actually bring life into the world. Good for the folks in the Magnolia State.
Permalink Reply by Pat on November 9, 2011 at 10:49am One more quick thought. Had the amendment passed, would they then get an arrest warrant out for God for all the miscarriages he causes?
Permalink Reply by Jerry Wesner on November 9, 2011 at 1:51pm Surely you don't thing god is a legal resident of Mississippi? (Oh. Or of anyplace else.)
Richard Haynes replied to Loren Miller's discussion Latest Activity?
Loren Miller replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds...
Patricia commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
The Flying Atheist commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
Debra Stevenson replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds...
booklover replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds...
booklover commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

