I just finished watching a documentary, "The Union, the business behind getting high", on Netflix (Netflix is my addiction).  Damning as far as setting forth an argument against prohibition, showing the societal costs of prohibition as opposed to lack of known negatives.  To be transparent about my own situation, I used as a teenager, thought better of it after getting some heroin-tainted product (which was too amazing), and never used again.  Didn't like getting high anyway.  I don't smoke, almost never drink, and it took a major disc problem before I was willing to take vicodin, and then only very briefly.  I really hate what oxycodone has done to our medical system and to management of pain in the susceptible, addictive-prone populations.  Purdue-Pharma has destroyed many lives, and made megabux, on oxycontin.  But I certainly don't care if other people use marijuana. 

 

The documentary set forth arguments for medical benefits in certain settings.  In some ways, they sound like "cure-all" benefits of other herbs, vitamins, and "natural products".  The costs of prohibition are significant, including infrastructure, outlays for employment of enforcing personnel, adding to distrust of government, and restriction of individual freedoms for little reason.

 

 

Costs of prohibition:

High incarceration rate.

Diversion of resources from other needs.

Miseducation of the public.

Deprives citizens of a generally safe product for entertainment and palliation.

 

Benefits of prohibition:

Certain industries benefit - private prisons, employment of prison guards, pharmaceutical industries.

Certain politicians benefit.  Plus, they're afraid that if they support repeal of prohibition, they'll lose the next election.

Parents get to have a soothing, false sense of security that their kids aren't using weed.  Just ocycontin and heroin.

 

 

It bothers me that marijuana is promoted as medicinal.  Even with certain benefits, the doctor is currently put in the impossible position of either being a 'go-to' person for "marijuana cards" - potentially putting their license at risk, and swamping their practice with people who want it for their 'headaches', 'back pain', and other real or not-real symptoms.  In addition, with increasing issues of oxycodone and other narcotic diversion, the DEA requires drug testing of some pain patients and if marijuana is present, their legal narcotic prescriptions must sometimes be cancelled.  With no quality control, safety regulation, dose management, it's impossible for the doctor to know what they are prescribing, or if it is safe or effective.  Not to mention, there is no training in use of marijuana and it doesnt come with long, lawyer-written disclaimers about the zillions of potential side effects that you get with, say, your cholesterol or blood pressure pills.

 

Really, medical marijuana seems like a 'back-door' route to  legalization.  But it's no more honest than people who want it illegal to "limit use", since it certainly hasn't eliminated use.

 

 

The primary use of marijuana is and should be recreational.  As for actual scientific trials of marijuana - I'm not sure there are any, or many, good clinical trials.  If someone wants to use it "medicinally", it should be in the same category as naturopathy or herbalism, unless controlled trials are able to demonstrate specific benefits in specific medical scenarios.  What is so bad about people having some fun?  It's safer than booze.  It's already illegal to drive while intoxicated, wehther with ethanol or marijuana.

 

What would happen if we eliminated the prohibition?

 

 

1 - Monsanto would make genetically engineered marijuana, and drive small players out of the market.  The Monsanto product would be Roundup-Ready, contain B. thuringensis as a pesticide, and contain zero (as opposed to almost zero) THC.  This would be a better renewable product than some of our other fiber and paper products.  (That being said, most of the hemp clothes that I have seen are really scratchy - maybe Ive just seen the wrond ones).  The tobacco companies, with existing manufacturing and marketing infrastructure, might dominate the market.

 

2 - Large scale use of hemp as an agricultural commodity, for fabric, fiber, and other uses, would make available billions of acres of plant material, and swamp the market with fake marijuana, resulting in sales of non-intoxicating hemp as bogus marijuana.  The only way for people to be sure that their weed is good, will be development of brand name products. 

 

3 - Companies like Marboro would get into the recreational marijuana industry, developing trusted brand names so that people could be reassured that they are buying "the real deal" instead of hemp intended for T-shirt manufacture or paper.  Some people would grow their own.  The plants do look pretty. 

 

Where is the nonsense in discussion of marijuana?

-claiming It's incredibly harmful.

-claiming Dire consequences would occur if prohibition ended.

-claiming It's a cure-all for anything that ails you.

-claiming It's a medicinal product and should be treated as medicine.

 

So that's my 2¢

Tags: marijuana

Views: 259

Replies to This Discussion

I think a lot also depends on the age of the user.
Huh... Well it's been 22 years and I feel fine. Hehe.
Weirdly, if you just sit around and do nothing at all, that can lead to psychosis.

On a side note, did you know that the wild almond from which the modern tree is descended produced deadly almonds, loaded with cyanide? Still trying to figure out how they domesticated that plant a few thousand years ago. Seems like the cost of the test program would have been prohibitive.
"Weirdly, if you just sit around and do nothing at all, that can lead to psychosis."

Damn. I'm so at risk....
Tell me about it. I thought I was hearing voices. Turns out I just left the TV on in the other room.
Are you following me?
Can't sleep. Cheshire demon will get me.

I never could understand why people didn't see the obvious connection between pot and paranoia. You're smoking an illegal substance with a quite distinctive odor. If you're caught smoking it you will be in deep shit. Of freaking course that will make you paranoid. It's got nothing to do with THC.
NORML ad gave statistics about people who go to jail for smoking pot.

"And you wonder why we're paranoid."

Not to mention it can take up to a month to not show up in a drug test.

It helped my paranoia to watch the "Busted" video about how to act if you see a cop, and what your rights are. I was proud of myself this 4/20, I have a job that "reserves the right to implement random testing" although they just do the saliva test which only goes back 2 days, I had a few paranoid thoughts but basically I knew I was going to get away with it...and I did!
I'd also heard it's helpful in preventing Alzheimer's, strangely enough.
Also by concidence, in the "current events" department, this article from CNN regarding the mind-boggling amount of money, crime, danger, and social disruption related to Mexican drug cartels growing marijuana in US national forests. ""This is about serious criminal organizations," Walters said. "They're willing to kill anybody who gets in their way. They're taking money back to those who kill prosecutors, judges and law enforcement." ... Over the past eight days, a federal, state and county law enforcement initiative called Operation LOCCUST has eradicated 420,000 marijuana plants here worth more than $1 billion on the street. By comparison, authorities eradicated 330,000 plants over the six-month growing season last month, said Lt. Mike Boudreaux of the Tulare County Sheriff's Department. The article claims that 3 plants are worth $12,000 on the street.

Damn, I love to garden! My tomatoes and chili peppers don't even come close to $12,000! Still with most of my garden in the front yard, I would have problems, I think.

This is an example of the cost of prohibition of recreational marijuana. These folks aren't growing this herb for migraines and chemotherapy-induced nausea and multiple sclerosis. They're growing it for getting stoned. Medicalization of marijuana will not solve the problem of Mexican Cartels converting national forests into war zones, killing judges, and fighting drug wars. But elimination prohibition for recreational pot would be a big help.
Yeah, but then the corporations would be the ones dictating war zones, killing judges, and fighting drug wars.... Oh, wait. They're already pretty good at that.

So, what was the difference between a cartel and a corporation again?
We appear to have learned nothing whatsoever from Al Capone.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service