I wanted to put this question out there to see how strongly everyone feels on this subject. Being that most of us trust in scientific fact and reasoning, I was wondering if everyone is absolutely, undeniably, 100% sure that a god doesn't exist.  I personally take into account that there is no proof of any cosmic creator so therefore I am about 99.9999% sure that there is no god. However we all agree that science is an ever evolving field and I don't think that there will ever be any proof to support the existence of a supreme being, but I can't be 100% sure until there is concrete proof against one. I would like to know what all of your thoughts on this.  

Views: 8870

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


You are merely theorising. There are many points in my above reply where I have quoted Hitchens. They all need serious consideration. My answer to your question would be " I would not attempt to reply to your theorising, but as far as I am concerned, I am a 100% atheist, no less! If skepticism fails, the first failure would have been Gallileo!

Madhukar Kulkarni.

What am I theorizing about? It is not just a theory that the impossible cannot happen. People who say that one cannot be sure of anything are irrational because this is a contradiction in itself. Skepticism in the presence of contradictory evidence is appropriate, but as a fundamental principle is just wrong. Keeping open to the possiblility of the impossible existing is improper skepticism. It is to these two points that I am referring. So your answer to my question is that you won't answer it? I applaud Gallileo and Hitchens, but not in how they may maintain skepticism as universal and fundamental.


What can be clear from my reply is that whatever the theory about the probality of the impossible happening, it is always posssible to take firm decisions. If that remote possilibility is to affect our decision making, bold decesion making wil be nonexisting in the world. Look at the faithfuls. The do not have an iota of doubt about their faith. So, even if you are theoretically right, there will always be subjects on which we will be called upon to take a firm decision. I have stated that I myself have taken a firm decision, just to add force to my argument, because I felt that atheism is one subject that needs my bold decision. 



Come on dude,

"whatever the theory about the probability of the impossible happening"

-I just can't take people seriously that think there is even a remote chance of the impossible happening. At least you're correct about there being no god.


What's the point to that comment, other than a demonstration of your emotional discontent? It's called logic, not revelation. Reason, not a burning bush. Brilliant comparison to the faithful, by the way. As if degree of belief had any causal correlation or inverse relation to truth.
Snap, he showed you!

My take is that god is extremely improbable. Equally improbable hypothese include unicorns and elves and ghosts.


In terms of everyday life, I think one has to assume that there is no god until such a time that the improbability of god's existence is reduced.


Furthermore, it makes no sense to assume in some improbabilities and not in others. Logic requires consistency. If you believe in god why not believe in other improbabilities such as Ra, elves, the loch Ness monster and Russell's flying celestial teapot?

MK, anti-faith certainty as a counterpoint?

I think if you believe in anything 100% then you are a fool or you have had a very lucky life. :-) 

One of the most profound thing that I learned in college was "Never say Never, Never say Always".


So then, the Earth is sometimes flat and sometimes, humans can shit unicorns.

LOL. I just watched two programs about multiverses. Some speculate that every possibility, no matter how unlikely, is real in some multiverse somewhere, because they are infinite. It's disturbing to think there might be a place where the equivalent of angels are real. I don't worry about gods, because logically contradictory stuff isn't just very improbable, that's impossible.

The unicorns would have to be rather small. You bet Prep H is big business there.


Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon




Latest Activity

Loren Miller replied to Joe's discussion Atheist TV Channel Will Launch by the End of the Month in the group Atheist News
10 minutes ago
Atheist Exile replied to Joe's discussion In the Middle East, Some Atheists Fake-Fast During Ramadan To Avoid Detection in the group Atheist News
12 minutes ago
Loren Miller posted a status
"A religion is sometimes the source of happiness...but it is a comfort appropriate for the weak, not for the strong. - Heinlein"
12 minutes ago
Luara posted a discussion
26 minutes ago
James B Bolton shared Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group on Facebook
52 minutes ago
Randall Smith commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
1 hour ago
Joe added 4 discussions to the group Atheist News
1 hour ago
BJ Saylor posted a status
"Here is the paper in regards to my last status http://ericsteinhart.com/articles/atheisms.pdf"
1 hour ago
booklover commented on Richard C Brown's group learnerscoffeeshack
1 hour ago
Randall Smith commented on Sentient Biped's group Food!
1 hour ago
booklover commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
1 hour ago
booklover commented on Little Name Atheist's group Atheist Ailurophiles
1 hour ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service