IS EVERYBODY 100% POSITIVE THERE IS NO GOD?

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by VeganApe on December 15, 2011 at 10:44am

It was a land based explosion, not dropped. mounted in a tower. was the first tested plutonium bomb. This is the type of bomb that requires incredible accuracy. It was amazing, it is far more difficult to produce and successfully detonate than a uranium based bomb. Just fantastic.....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by VeganApe on December 16, 2011 at 9:41am

I suppose, do you know that the united states has detonated around 1200 nuclear device, This compares to 800 for the rest of the world combined. But that is a total of 2000 bombs. I was fine with the first couple of tests to prove the point ( accept for the hiroshima and nagasaki, that was a war crime) but most people don't know how many where let off. of that about 500 were on its own soil, the other 700 were on atolls and literally destroyed entire ecosystems. 

Permalink Reply by Cindy Blakeslee on December 15, 2011 at 10:46am

Yes.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sansdeity on December 16, 2011 at 1:25pm

I'm 100% sure.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by bobh on December 16, 2011 at 11:40pm

its like Richard Dawkins said...never say never but on his scale of 1-7 positive theist to total atheist, i rate myself a 6. as does Dawkins rate himself.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MCT on December 17, 2011 at 2:29pm

"Based on what evidence?"

-His last several replies.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sansdeity on December 17, 2011 at 3:16pm

That's what any statistician would call a sampling error. Logic fail.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MCT on December 17, 2011 at 3:23pm

OK, maybe you can take out the garbage, but here on this thread, what I have noticed from you trolling me, is that you have no substance, only insults.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by VeganApe on December 17, 2011 at 3:28pm

I can not say you are correct or incorrect as I nave not seen any posts of detail.

SansDeity - Now is your chance if you have a small minute to put together a summary of your view in relation to MCT's position.

MCT - I can only assume you have more information available to you than me on this matter.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MCT on December 17, 2011 at 4:03pm

He has no position, other than my position makes him want to insult me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sansdeity on December 17, 2011 at 3:39pm

Ahh yes! Take out the garbage! Now there is a comment that just oozes substance. Has it ever occurred to you that you are a caricature of yourself MCT?

Anywho, I'm just making accurate observations. I do not have as much free time as you to set up residence here and spend inordinate amounts of time each day debating abstract topics. Even if I did I'm not sure I would do it on an atheist site as I'd be much better served doing so on, say, scienceblogs where I would be conversing with actual scientists rather than a kid who took a class in epistemology. But I can understand your fear of debating such topics on places like those and your preference for doing it here.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MCT on December 17, 2011 at 4:01pm

I have plenty of substance on this thread. Your observations are anything but accurate. It is not a scientific issue. It is a philosophical one. I do not debate scientific findings, only their relevance to the nature of existence. 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 131
• 132
• 133
• 134
• 135
• …
• 155
• Next ›
• Page