Tags:
Permalink Reply by paul babcock on June 9, 2011 at 5:37am
Permalink Reply by booklover on June 9, 2011 at 6:37am
Permalink Reply by Matthew Thompson on June 9, 2011 at 9:57pm
Permalink Reply by David Anam on June 10, 2011 at 12:18am You can't really "prove" your point to them, as they will find some reason to discount whatever argument you make, regardless of how accurate it is. I would say the key is not to win the game, but to play well. The person you are arguing with will probably never concede, but a well-reasoned argument and a cool temper could make an impression on any silent observers who are perhaps more on the fence.
On the side, "thou shalt not kill" is from the notoriously poorly-translated King James version of the Bible, while more modern Bibles use the more accurate translation "thou shalt not murder." Killing is presumably acceptable if done in a lawful manner, such as sentencing a homosexual to death as ordered by God. In most cases, the Bible is only contradictory if you try to interpret it to mean something civilized. Taken as blatant bronze-age barbarism, most of it makes sense.
Joseph P replied to The Big Blue Frog's discussion Gum Chewing and Talking In Class in the group Winning Arguments!
Mathew T. replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Mathew T. replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Daily Show takes on Christian persecution
Mathew T. replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Loren Miller replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Edward Snowden: War on Whistleblowers "Only Builds Better Whistleblowers" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Tom Sarbeck replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Edward Snowden: War on Whistleblowers "Only Builds Better Whistleblowers" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Debra Stevenson commented on Loren Miller's blog post Of Wardens and Caretakers ... and Gods...© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

