In Jerusalem, scholars trace Bible's evolution: others speak of forgery and deception



In Jerusalem, scholars trace Bible's evolution
By MATTI FRIEDMAN - Associated Press | AP ­ Fri, Aug 12, 2011

JERUSALEM (AP) ­ A dull-looking chart projected on the wall of a university office in Jerusalem displayed a revelation that would startle many readers of the Old Testament: the sacred text that people revered in the past was not the same one we study today.

An ancient version of one book has an extra phrase. Another appears to have been revised to retroactively insert a prophecy after the events happened.

Scholars in this out-of-the-way corner of the Hebrew University campus have been quietly at work for 53 years on one of the most ambitious projects attempted in biblical studies ­ publishing the authoritative edition of the Old Testament, also known as the Hebrew Bible, and tracking every single evolution of the text over centuries and millennia.

And it has evolved, despite deeply held beliefs to the contrary.

For many Jews and Christians, religion dictates that the words of the Bible in the original Hebrew are divine, unaltered and unalterable. For Orthodox Jews, the accuracy is considered so inviolable that if a synagogue's Torah scroll is found to have a minute error in a single letter, the entire scroll is unusable.

But the ongoing work of the academic detectives of the Bible Project, as their undertaking is known, shows that this text at the root of Judaism, Christianity and Islam was somewhat fluid for long periods of its history, and that its transmission through the ages was messier and more human than most of us imagine.

The project's scholars have been at work on their critical edition of the Hebrew Bible, a version intended mainly for the use of other scholars, since 1958.

"What we're doing here must be of interest for anyone interested in the Bible," said Michael Segal, the scholar who heads the project.

The sheer volume of information makes the Bible Project's version "the most comprehensive critical edition of the Hebrew Bible in existence at the present time," said David Marcus, a Bible scholar at the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York, who is not involved with the project.

But Segal and his colleagues toil in relative anonymity. Their undertaking is nearly unknown outside a circle of Bible experts numbering several hundred people at most, and a visitor asking directions to the Bible Project's office on the university campus will find that many members of the university's own staff have never heard of it.

This is an endeavor so meticulous, its pace so disconnected from that of the world outside, that in more than five decades of work the scholars have published a grand total of three of the Hebrew Bible's 24 books. (Christians count the same books differently, for a total of 39.) A fourth is due out during the upcoming academic year.

If the pace is maintained, the final product will be complete a little over 200 years from now. This is both a point of pride and a matter of some mild self-deprecation around the office.

Bible Project scholars have spent years combing through manuscripts such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, Greek translations on papyrus from Egypt, a printed Bible from 1525 Venice, parchment books in handwritten Hebrew, the Samaritan Torah, and scrolls in Aramaic and Latin. The last member of the original team died last year at age 90.

The scholars note where the text we have now differs from older versions ­ differences that are evidence of the inevitable textual hiccups, scribal errors and other human fingerprints that became part of the Bible as it was passed on, orally and in writing.

A Microsoft Excel chart projected on one wall on a recent Sunday showed variations in a single phrase from the Book of Malachi, a prophet.

The verse in question, from the text we know today, makes reference to "those who swear falsely." The scholars have found that in quotes from rabbinic writings around the 5th century A.D., the phrase was longer: "those who swear falsely in my name."

In another example, this one from the Book of Deuteronomy, a passage referring to commandments given by God "to you" once read "to us," a significant change in meaning.

Other differences are more striking.

The Book of Jeremiah is now one-seventh longer than the one that appears in some of the 2,000-year-old manuscripts known as the Dead Sea Scrolls. Some verses, including ones containing a prophecy about the seizure and return of Temple implements by Babylonian soldiers, appear to have been added after the events happened.

The year the Bible Project began, 1958, was the year a priceless Hebrew Bible manuscript arrived in Jerusalem after it was smuggled out of Aleppo, Syria, by a Jewish cheese merchant who hid it in his washing machine. This was the 1,100-year-old Aleppo Codex, considered the oldest and most accurate version of the complete biblical text in Hebrew.

The Bible Project's version of the core text ­ the one to which the others are compared ­ is based on this manuscript. Other critical editions of the Bible, such as one currently being prepared in Stuttgart, Germany, are based on a slightly newer manuscript held in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Considering that the nature of their work would be considered controversial, if not offensive, by many religious people, it is perhaps surprising that most of the project's scholars are themselves Orthodox Jews.

"A believing Jew claims that the source of the Bible is prophecy," said the project's bearded academic secretary, Rafael Zer. "But as soon as the words are given to human beings ­ with God's agreement, and at his initiative ­ the holiness of the biblical text remains, even if mistakes are made when the text is passed on."

.       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

        Much has already been contributed by other bible scholars, historians, archaeologists,  linguists, lexical analysts, and others over the past couple of centuries.  E.g. --

Forged: Writing in the Name of God -- Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are;
Bart D. Ehrman, 2011, Harper Collins, ISBN-13: 978-0062012616

Misquoting Jesus:  the story behind who changed the Bible and why;
Bart D. Ehrman, 2005, HarperCollins, ISBN-13:  978-0-06-073817-4

Misquoting Jesus:  The Story Behind Who Changed the New Testament and Why;
Bart D. Ehrman (Kindle Edition - 3 Feb 2009); HarperCollins; ISBN-13:  978-0739469842

The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel;
Israel Finkelstein + Neil Asher Silberman, 2002, Touchstone, ISBN-13: 978-0684869131

Who Wrote the Bible?;
Richard Elliott Friedman, 1997, HarperCollins, ISBN-13: 978-0060630355

Sex Rites: The Origins of Christianity -- The Ritual Use of Sex, Drugs, and Human Sacrifice;

Richard Dawkins:  "The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction:  jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."  ["The God Delusion", 2006, chapter 2]

The King James Bible includes eight references to unicorns: 
Numbers 23,22; Numbers 24,8; Deuteronomy 33,17; Job 39,9-10;
Psalms 22,21; Psalms 29,6; Psalms 92,10; Isaiah 34,7.
Although the Latin "Vulgate" mostly uses "rinoceros", the older Greek "Septuagint" [allegedly begun in the third century BCE when Ptolemy II summoned six elders from each of the twelve tribes of Israel to translate the Pentateuch for Jews in Alexandria who spoke Greek, not Hebrew] uses "monokerws" for all the unicorn references, bar Isaiah.  --  At the very least, any self-respecting, half-way omniscient and prescient deity really should avoid any ambiguity in its Divine Manifesto.

Tags: bible, deception, evolution, forgery, greek, hebrew, unicorns

Views: 60

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The evidence will speak for itself and the evidence says "FAIL" at being what it was touted to be.  Most of us on this site already knew most of this by our own studies.  Now the religious have to bite the bullet on the evidence or they will deny the evidence, which is more likely, and say it is a test of their faith.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service