"Hopefully, this stuff will be fixed soon. It is really causing some problems. Thanks for your patience. "
 |
The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
How can Anyone Oppose Higher Taxes on the Rich?
On a near party-line vote Republicans blocked Obama's attempts to make sure that millionaires pay at least 30 percent of their income in taxes. Why do so many low-income and middle-income Americans oppose such commonsense pollicies?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Richard ∑wald on -
-
Permalink Reply by Jedi Wanderer on -
Thanks for the pic, Richard.
-
Permalink Reply by Steph S. on -
Yes, they think trickle down economics is the answer to the bad economy.
-
Permalink Reply by Jonathan Simeone on -
Except for the fact that trickle down economics has never worked that view makes complete sense. Why is it that poor people are fine paying more in taxes than wealthy people? You'd think greed would make that impossible.
-
Permalink Reply by Jedi Wanderer on
-
Found this book called "Unequal Democracy" by Larry M. Bartels, you guys (especially those of you who think trickle-down economics work, ahem!) should check it out. A link http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8664.html and a brief summary:
"Using a vast swath of data spanning the past six decades, Unequal Democracy debunks many myths about politics in contemporary America, using the widening gap between the rich and the poor to shed disturbing light on the workings of American democracy. Larry Bartels shows the gap between the rich and poor has increased greatly under Republican administrations and decreased slightly under Democrats, leaving America grossly unequal. This is not simply the result of economic forces, but the product of broad-reaching policy choices in a political system dominated by partisan ideologies and the interests of the wealthy.
Bartels demonstrates that elected officials respond to the views of affluent constituents but ignore the views of poor people. He shows that Republican presidents in particular have consistently produced much less income growth for middle-class and working-poor families than for affluent families, greatly increasing inequality. He provides revealing case studies of key policy shifts contributing to inequality, including the massive Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 and the erosion of the minimum wage. Finally, he challenges conventional explanations for why many voters seem to vote against their own economic interests, contending that working-class voters have not been lured into the Republican camp by "values issues" like abortion and gay marriage, as commonly believed, but that Republican presidents have been remarkably successful in timing income growth to cater to short-sighted voters.
Unequal Democracy is social science at its very best. It provides a deep and searching analysis of the political causes and consequences of America's growing income gap, and a sobering assessment of the capacity of the American political system to live up to its democratic ideals."
-
Permalink Reply by Jonathan Simeone on
-
Thanks to all who have participated in this discussion already. I'm looking forward to checking out that book Phoenix-Wanderer. This issue has interested me for a very long time.
-
Permalink Reply by Jedi Wanderer on
-
You're welcome Jonathan, and since I don't have the time to get to that book right now, much as I'd like to, if you do get a chance to look at it, will you check back in with me and let me know what you think?
-
Permalink Reply by Sentient Biped on -
To be more thoughtful about this question, there is more to it than theories of trickle down economics. I think you have to ask, and listen to, voters who represent working class and middle class Americans and see what they really say. I don't know that a lot of them know about "trickle down" economics. Other factors could include, aligning themselves with the "moral" issue of the Republican right wing (religion being their opiate), attitudes about authoritarianism (that being the right wing, again), the fantasy of somehow "striking it rich" and wanting to be able to keep it all, the attitude the rich know how to get rich, so would pass that on to the country if elected. It's also the "package" that the right wing offers - reactionary social attitudes, the sense of security that authoritarian regimes provide (even if false), the opportunity to scapegoat disinfranchesed people so that blame for bad times is not in the hands of the working class and middle class, the security of feeling "right". As for why republican politicians vote against taxes for the rich, it's the rich who pay them and help keep them in office.
*
Much of this is speculation on my part. I much prefer actual data.
-
Permalink Reply by booklover on -
I was listening to Ed Shultz on the radio yesterday and they were talking about this. I'm pretty sure that's which show I was listening to at the time, lol, I listen to a lot of them. Someone was saying that people that align with the rich might think well everybody has the right to earn as much money as they can and then keep it. If they take money from the rich people, they might take it from me ( them). They don't get that it's a privilege to live in a country that makes you able to earn that much money. Also very rich people get their money from investing and then get tax-breaks. Why should it matter if you get your income from working or investing? If you get income, it should be taxed the same. There shouldn't be tax-breaks for wealthy people. If you don't help to bring everyone up in a society there will be anarchy. No man is an island.;)
-
Permalink Reply by Mitch Keene on -
YOUR DEMONIZING SUCCESS and hurting the job creators! I won't be able to buy that new jet this year , ill have to wait til next year!
CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Loren Miller replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds..."Terrific ... I have a SWELL theme park I'd like to sell you, then. Only problem is: it's a real Mickey Mouse operation...!"
Patricia commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"We do tend to stick with each other when nature decides to give us this invader to fight. Willingly or not, we are in a sort of club. Early detection is key, so let's go gals, you know what ya gotta do!
"
The Flying Atheist commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"Steph, in summer school are you going to be the student or the teacher? What classes will you be involved with?"
Debra Stevenson replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds..."And I believe Joseph Smith was a true prophet, the Book of Mormon is as true as the Jewish and Christian bilbes, Jesus is the Christ and the LDS church is Yahweh's only one and true religion on the face of the earth and there is nothing you…"
booklover replied to booklover's discussion Even More FB Finds..."I did see that Matt! Thanks for posting it! Awesome woman to say that on National television! Esp. in what I assume is a very xtian town. I no longer like Wolf Blitzer. I was thinking of that interview when I posted this last…"
"perfect! did you see my recent post on Wolf Blitzer interviewing an Atheist?
http://www.atheistnexus.org/forum/topics/yes-wolf-blitzer-asked-the-wrong-person-if-she-thanked-the-lord
totally made my day!"
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
