Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Tony Carroll on August 14, 2012 at 9:17pm

Hahahaha! James, I love this! Where can I send the happy couple a wedding gift? I know, in care of Newt, until they get back from the honeymoon. After all, Newt's been married three times. He'll know the right time to give it to them. Mazel Tov to the happy couple.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on August 14, 2012 at 9:42pm

I knew it, I KNEW IT!!!

Paul Ryan is into CROSS-DRESSING!!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tony Carroll on August 14, 2012 at 9:49pm

Hey Loren, Does this count as polygamy? I mean, Romney is a Mor(m)on, after.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James M. Martin on August 15, 2012 at 7:32am

Actually, the funny part is that Ryan is just too butch, what with that perpetual, Nixon-like 5 o'clock shadow, to be any "good" at transvestism.  I think I will write him with some tips.  I suspect he will want to spend thousands of dollars and many long hours at the electrolysists' having those stubs plucked, one by one.  But there is an easier way, a cream he can rub into it and make it "go away" once the foundation is applied.  When I saw this PhotoShop, I almost lost consciousness from laughing so loud.  It's just too, too absurd.  I think he can go on the Ru Paul show and really have some fun.  (That's it! He shall from now on be known as Ru Paul Ryan.  I'm busting a gut.)  As for Mittens, he is clueless. He would not know a TV from Frommer, and would be one of those johns who, having "gone" with "her" would wind up in a lowdown hotel room expressing incredible surprise once the dress is off and the panties down, and lo and behold....!  My God!, a penis!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John Aultman on August 14, 2012 at 10:24pm

I could see this on the cover of Rolling Stone Magazine.  Excellent James.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Marcus A Pryor on August 15, 2012 at 12:59am

The worst thing about these two jokes is they will get some 50 million votes.  There is no hope for reason when that many idiots exist in the U.S.  Thank goodness there are a few more intelligent thinkers who will vote Democratic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lillie on August 15, 2012 at 7:40am

Unfortunately, these 50 million are proud to be idiots and like to bash the intelligent.  Apparently, intelligence is out of style.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on August 15, 2012 at 7:51am

It's not just that intelligence is out of style; it's contrary to the GOP's interests and goals.  If you're smart enough to recognize what is going on, you're likely smart enough to see through their BS and deceptions.  That either means they want you out NOW before you can tell someone else or they want you in the inner sanctum of the party so that you can construct schemes to fool others.

Charming, no?  (No, actually, about as "charming" as a dead frog)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pat on August 15, 2012 at 9:00am

Intelligence and rationality are, to republican voters, what sunlight and a crucifix are, to vampires. The "bride" is touted as a fiscal conservative and deficit hawk. Here's a record of his fiscal conservatism.

1. He voted the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan by adding their cost to the national debt and borrowing the dough from China.

2. He support the largest highway bill in history, and voted for the "bridge to nowhere."

3. He voted for the Bush tax cuts without any offset in spending. Again, make up the deficit by borrowing from Beijing.

4. He voted for TARP under Bush, but when the Democrats got in, then it was poison.

5. He supported the Bush Medicaid Drug Bill without raising any revenue to pay for it.

6. He blames the current President for the auto industry bailout, but actually voted for it himself.

7.  He supported virtually every deficit growing measure under Bush the Lesser (Bush II), but now is the portrayed as the medieval knight in shining armor against deficits.

But, I suppose, those voting for him and Romney will continue to parrot the talking point memo line that it's all the black guy's fault. Like I said, rationality and crucifixes.

• ▶ Reply