Discovered today atheists I'm quiet close to have embraced - gasp - Zeitgeist.
I fear an argument briewing so I need the cliff notes version on why Zeitgeist is a load of crap.
From searching this site, I've already dug up this link and sent it to them, but I shall need more
So what are the, let's say 10 biggest things wrong with Zeitgeist?
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Stanley Post on January 11, 2011 at 6:17am Everything that I could say about it is already in the Skeptics link.
You should be able to get more then 10 reasons just from that (and with Googling references), but I will throw in one more;
it's bullshit! ;)
Permalink Reply by Richard Healy on January 11, 2011 at 6:39am What I fear though is them comign back with a retort, I don't know how to answer, ancient egyptian history etc isn't an area I know much of anything about.
Permalink Reply by Stanley Post on January 11, 2011 at 7:03am Richard,
I have several books on this subject, but you do not really need to read them to get your answers.
There are loads of websites from real scientists. You can look up the following on Wikipeidia:
Anctient Greek and Egyptian culture; History of Ancient Philosophy.
One very important thing to remember is, ancient peoples "thought" about the universe and the world around them COMPLETELY differently then we do.
It's not because they were stupid, it's because science had not been invented yet; there was no other way to explain anything in their lives in any other way then "the gods".
They did not have a "theiology", they left that part to the philosophers, they simply did what they thought would make the gods happy, and the gods would take care of them ;)
I have seen alot of websites from folks who totally missunderstand how these people lived and thought because they are attempting to rationalize using their modern way of thinking.
You have to abandon that rational to understand them, their beliefs, and their gods.
There are several websites that make the same false claims that Horus, Isis, Ra, etc. show paralles to Jesus; myth for myth, this is bullshit, it's not true.
The ancients had a "mindset" about what the "attributes" of a god or diety SHOULD be, they did not copy myth for myth.
For example, did the folks who invented Dr. Pepper invent the soft drink?
No, they took what was already accepted, carbonated water, sugar and flavors, and made a new kind :)
Permalink Reply by Richard Healy on January 11, 2011 at 7:15am The ancients had a "mindset" about what the "attributes" of a god or diety SHOULD be, they did not copy myth for myth.
I have heard that about scribes copy scripture; scribe would happen across a piece of text which made a heretical claim or perhaps would inherit a marginal note containing an illustrative moral anecdote pencilled into the margins, and because they thought it's the sort of thign Jesus SHOULD do or if it sounded nifty enough that he could co-opt it. It's the running theory for how The woman caught in adultry gets included in the gospel of John - the pathos and twist and moral is a nice self-contained package, it matters not whether or not Jesus was the originator it gets attributed to him then later copyists turn it into scriptural orthodoxy.
Permalink Reply by Stanley Post on January 11, 2011 at 8:09am Yep, this is one reason why the christian bible is full of redundency, contradiction, and sudden change in writting style. The notes, corrections, anecdotes, etc. written in the margins by translators and others, where included in the total modern version (along with some edits by King James ;)
There were alot of arguments about what should, should not be included.
In fact, the bible is actually quite edited from the original Hebrew (in the case of the old testament) and Greek (for the new). Which is a bit odd since the new testament is supposed to have been written entirely by Jews, though Greek was delared the "official" languge.
And some phrases had no english eqivalent meaning, so substitutions were made with the idea that "this" is what they "really" must have meant :\ but it was done honestly.
Since almost none of the original holy books exist, as they were written on parchment and other perishable media, alot of stuff is not known and still under argument.
For example, the ancient bible was much more polytheist then monotheist.
Saints, Mary, Paul, Moses, etc. where considered deities themselves, so the bible is really
polytheist in disguise! ;)
Permalink Reply by Stanley Post on January 11, 2011 at 8:51am Richard,
Here are 2 very good texts I highly recommend:
"The Ancient Mysteries: A Sourcebook of Sacred Texts" by Marvin Meyer and,
"The Birth of Christianity: Reality and Myth" by Joel Carmichael.
They are NOT pop atheist books, they are well researched and peer reviewed texts, and
they are not as "dry" as you would think, they are really interesting to read.
A little off the subject, but one of the best books, is: "The Improbibility of God" by Michael Martin and Ricki Monnier. It's a collection of arguments by noted scientists and philosophers including a chapter on evolution by Richard Dawkins.
Any of the above books can be had used, cheap! from Amazon. I bought these for under $5 in very good (used) condition :)
Read them, and you will WIN any theist argument they can toss at you :)
Permalink Reply by Richard Healy on January 11, 2011 at 2:19pm
Permalink Reply by Barbara on January 11, 2011 at 10:48am Hi - I haven't seen Zeitgeist yet but it was mentioned on a couple episodes of The Atheist Experience and the hosts weren't kind to it. Here's a page that goes through it in some detail, hope it helps even if it doesn't present a top 10 list of problems with it (link found at the Iron Chariots wiki along with the Skeptic link you already posted - http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Zeitgeist)
http://www.conspiracyscience.com/articles/zeitgeist/
Permalink Reply by Richard Healy on January 11, 2011 at 2:18pm
Permalink Reply by FreeThinker on January 27, 2011 at 6:25pm Here's a Youtube clip of the Atheist Experience episode calling out Zeitgeist:
Permalink Reply by The Snide Atheist on January 12, 2011 at 3:38pm Unfortunately, it's very difficult to prove bullshit to those without functioning bullshit detectors.
Permalink Reply by Matt VDB on January 13, 2011 at 3:52pm
Napoleon Bonaparte posted a video
Rick Goodner posted a video
Jonathan Simeone posted a status
Debra Stevenson commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
Loren Miller commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.