Have Dog Owners Gone Too Far?
I have been pondering the status of man's best friend. I am shocked at the behavior of many pet owners who are willing to sink into debt to fund an expensive operation for their canine "family member."
This article was recently published in the Humanist. I personally think it raises an interesting point or two. I often say that dogs are social parasites that developed behaviors to trick humans into thinking they share our emotions. I wonder if millions of years of evolution of dogs and people in close proximity has this furry parasite perfectly adapted to feed off our highly evolved social needs.
link ... http://thehumanist.com/humanist/09_nov_dec/Pedersen.html
Excerpt below...
There was a time when "Dog is my co-pilot" was merely a fun slap at the "God is my co-pilot" bumper sticker, and it was funny precisely because nobody would ever think to elevate their dog to such a height. Within the past decade, however, pets—primarily dogs—have soared in importance. ("Dog is my co-pilot" is now the slogan of Bark, a magazine of dog culture, and the title of an anthology—published by Bark's editors—billed as essays, short stories, and expert commentaries that explore "every aspect of our life with dogs.") Canines, with their pack instincts and trainability, are by far the most likely pet to be anthropomorphized as a family member, a best friend, or a "fur baby," treated accordingly with gourmet meals, designer apparel, orthopedic beds, expensive therapy, and catered birthday parties. Some people even feel (and in some cases, demonstrate) that their dogs are worth dying for. Others say the animal lovers are going too far.
This article was recently published in the Humanist. I personally think it raises an interesting point or two. I often say that dogs are social parasites that developed behaviors to trick humans into thinking they share our emotions. I wonder if millions of years of evolution of dogs and people in close proximity has this furry parasite perfectly adapted to feed off our highly evolved social needs.
link ... http://thehumanist.com/humanist/09_nov_dec/Pedersen.html
Excerpt below...
There was a time when "Dog is my co-pilot" was merely a fun slap at the "God is my co-pilot" bumper sticker, and it was funny precisely because nobody would ever think to elevate their dog to such a height. Within the past decade, however, pets—primarily dogs—have soared in importance. ("Dog is my co-pilot" is now the slogan of Bark, a magazine of dog culture, and the title of an anthology—published by Bark's editors—billed as essays, short stories, and expert commentaries that explore "every aspect of our life with dogs.") Canines, with their pack instincts and trainability, are by far the most likely pet to be anthropomorphized as a family member, a best friend, or a "fur baby," treated accordingly with gourmet meals, designer apparel, orthopedic beds, expensive therapy, and catered birthday parties. Some people even feel (and in some cases, demonstrate) that their dogs are worth dying for. Others say the animal lovers are going too far.
Tags: anthropomophic, dogs, pets
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by John D on -
Free thinker - Sounds like you are talking about misanthropy. I just stumbled on this term the other day. It means hatred of humans.
There are some people who feel that only humans can be "evil". This makes it hard for them to feel compassion for others. They claim that animals are "innocent" and thus deserve pity. We "evil" humans don't deserve pity because we are guilty. An odd morality in my opinion.
I am not saying most pet owners are like this.... but I have met my share and I find it disturbing.
As an aside...Any monkey owners out there? These creatures take 24/7 attention and have been getting more and more popular. My neighbor had a spider monkey and they didn't spend enough time with it. You could hear the poor animal screaming its head off all the way down the street. Monkeys do not make a good pets in my opinion. Too much like having a real kid!
-
Permalink Reply by Dallas Gaytheist on -
Monkeys are illegal I believe and can spread a deadly form of hepatitis. You should report them. The monkey belongs at a sanctuary, since it is probably impossible to return it to the wild now.
-
Permalink Reply by John D on
-
Dallas - this was years ago. I don't know any monkey owner, but have seen them on the TV. Are monkeys illegal everywhere or is it established state by state (or in certain countries)?
-
Permalink Reply by Dallas Gaytheist on
-
Are monkeys illegal everywhere or is it established state by state (or in certain countries)?
Well, don't quote me on this, but I believe they are illegal in all 50 states. They are considered a wild, non-native species. This kind of wild pet trade can really be detrimental to native species. Boas or pythons that got too big for their owners and were released into the wild are out of control in the Florida everglades, devastating the native wildlife, and San Francisco is overrun with non-native parrots.
-
Permalink Reply by Daniel the Apostate on -
Man is the cruelest animal. At tragedies, bullfights, and crucifixions he has so far felt best on earth; and when he invented hell for himself, behold, that was his very heaven.
— Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
The more I see of men, the more I admire dogs.
-Jeanne-Marie Roland
-Of all the animals, man is the only one that is cruel. He is the only one that inflicts pain for the pleasure of doing it.
-Mark Twain
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you; that is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
-Mark Twain
-He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.
-Immanuel Kant
-To insult someone we call him "bestial." For deliberate cruelty and nature, "human" might be the greater insult.
-Isaac Asimov
-
Permalink Reply by John D on
-
Daniel - great quotes -
but it sort of proves my point. The idea that dogs are somehow noble is pure B/S. They are just dogs. If they had complex human emotions and had to make choices they would be just like people. Why is it so "evil" that we humans must make choices. An interesting problem with how humans view the ethical world.
-
Permalink Reply by Dallas Gaytheist on
-
Why is it so "evil" that we humans must make choices.
I don't think it is evil that we must make choices, but that our choices are so often evil in themselves, even when we know better.
-
Permalink Reply by Daniel the Apostate on
-
John,
Of course we have to make choices. As long as your choices agree with my values, it's not evil, it's good. :-)
(Internet humor is often mistaken. That's a joke)
-
Permalink Reply by Free Thinker on -
Hey, John D.,
My brother's name is John D. too. John David, to be exact.
Anyway, when I was 6 or 7, and living in the Panama Canal Zone, my Dad built a huge cage in a tree, then brought home a chimpanzee to put in it. Chimps are NOT native to Panama, though other monkeys are, so don't ask me where he got it. The chimp was completely wild and beyond domestication (at least, by us). He only lasted for a couple of weeks before my Dad got rid of him (I don't know how).
I haven't thought of that chimp for decades! Thanks for the nostalgia trip.
-
Permalink Reply by Free Thinker on
-
@Sydni,
I guess we have different histories and, therefor, different priorities. We totally disagree with each other. So be it. On the few occasions when the topic comes up, I've always (since a teenager) maintained that there is too much human misery to squander resources on pets. In the U.S., it's excessive. That's my opinion and I express it in the hope that I might persuade others to give more selectively and help their fellow human beings first.
By the way, I didn't say "compassion must be appropriated to only human animals". I singled out pets and specifically said "Endangered wildlife species is one thing . . . but pets?"
I knew there'd be strong reactions: most U.S. citizens have never seen real poverty first-hand and are too insulated from human suffering elsewhere in the world. They also take their relative privilege for granted. If I can stir things up and take people out of their comfort zone, they might see the issue from a different perspective. To me, that would be making a positive contribution.
-
Permalink Reply by Free Thinker on
-
@Sydni,
This planet has all kinds of problems that require our attention. Global warming, endangered species and ecosystems, nuclear proliferation, over-population, disease, starvation.
All I'm saying is that the multi-billion dollar pet industry (including charities), when placed in context with the pressing problems of the world, is a travesty of indulgence. Why is it wrong to point this out? We love our pets (I have 2 dogs and 2 cats) but, as the title of this discussion asks, "Have Dog Owners Gone Too Far?"
The topic pulled me in because I have an opinion about it. That opinion is strongly held, ever since my teenage years. I believe that adding my perspective to the discussion is important because it wasn't really being explored. Advocating more emphasis on people and less on pets is not an attack on anybody -- any more than advocating ANY minority point of view.
If I believe in something, knowing it's a minority view, I'm not going to surrender to the majority for the sake of popularity. If it's important to me, I'll speak up: especially if invited. Those who disagree with my ideas can respond accordingly . . . or they can attack me personally. I can't control how they respond.
Support Nexus
Buy Amazon items here and help A|N:
Advertisements
Pre-order The New Sam Harris Book:
Helpful Items
Search Atheist Nexus:
Translate page: Social Networking Links:
Translate page: Social Networking Links:
Latest Activity
I've been a good doo-bee.
Oh wait I smoked a good doobie...
Uh Oh....WICKERMAN !!!!!!!!!!!!
Dancing Poles????
Not the eyeballs!
No one needs it ... yet how many seem to insist on it.
Honestly, one of them could "rift" all she wants, and neither I nor my wife would be that upset. The other one is a big wimp. She's not likely to make a stink over it. She'll just pray harder. She's good at compartmentalizing that way.
It is true that many people take the path of religion to lead them out of destructive life styles.
It is also true that people can do the same thing without a reliance on faith (you just don't hear about it as much).
You sound like a very nice you…
I thought it was utterly brilliant that he said Abbot's offer of a billion dollars for Hobart hospital was immoral!
His refusal of such a ridiculous bribe iis one of the first moral acts I've ever seen from a politician. Clearly the man will have a…
I've seen posts about the 50 commandments of jeebus put out by xtians that cite chapter and verse and you really don't need a commentary to go along with them.
Boy it sure does kill the whole GOP/Tea Party platform.
I'm telling Miss Julie! . . (Sombody wants a spanking!!).
Seems like you could be in danger of getting more than just your tongue stuck, to a dancing pole at the north pole . . .
© Copyright 2010 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. | FAQ | Site Rules
