Like I said, I was simply wanting to understand how you explain taking the extra risk. I don't have any official stand on 'gun' control, it's one of those rare issues where I don't believe me! hehe :)
But lets ponder on additional question, your putting your life at stake by 'gun' ownership... one who smokes cigarettes trades the risk to life for a sense of enjoyment, as does a motorcyclist, so it's at its essence hedonism in exchange for risk. Now if you're dead, you didn't achieve protection, so what exactly is it that you're exchanging death for, it's not hedonism that for sure...
Two convenience store operators (or fathers) on same street, side by side, have robbery
-one that defended with gun is dead, and robbed, and family fatherless
-one that did not escalate is robbed, alive, and still a father.
For your family, which one do you chose?
Well, I don't really think about that. Maybe I have a higher death wish than most people. Really to me it's just being more safe than sorry, and my overall distrust of humans. I may live in a decent neighborhood, but you don't have to go far at all before you're in some nasty areas. Just a couple of miles in certain directions. I've lived in some of those areas too. It's a nice wake up call when people are shooting each other in your back yard, and I do mean that literally.
Yeah, if the day ever comes when someone does try to rob me or something, I may get killed. It could happen to any of us. But "Bob"dammit, I'm at least going to take the cocksucker down with me in the process.
[...] Really to me it's just being more safe than sorry [...]
How is being dead '"more safe"? I'm sorry I'm just not seeing the logic here :(
If I could understand that, I think I might better understand the pro-gun faction...