At a dinner party last night, I overheard two sisters talking about a third who lives north of here. The two -- let's call them Alice and Becky -- were critical of the third sister's husband, Jeff, who followed the gun control controversy and expressed frustration and anxiety. Alice, whose husband probably has a hunting rifle at most, is fairly open-minded and the least rigidly religious of the three, Becky being more conservative (and more religious), married to a Baptist country boy who probably has a rifle or two and a shotgun. The gun-lover's wife, Cathy, is an evangelical. That's right: there is a direct correlation between the extent of their religious inclination and their ownership of weapons.
While I was with Alice and Becky last night, Becky discussed a phone call she had with Cathy, who was bemoaning the fact that her husband, Jeff, robbed the piggy bank after concluding from Fox News broadcasts that the government was about to pass new gun control laws. And even if they didn't do that, they were going to pass laws limiting how much ammo you could have, or whether you could use clips of more than ten rounds. Before she could point out that the money could be better applied to house repairs, things he'd been saying for months, "Oh, I'll fix that." He indulges his weapons fetish along with one for motorcycles and must have been watching too many Mad Max movies, only in this case it is Mad Jeff.
It became clear to me that Alice and Becky both dislike Jeff. From what I know of him, I am inclined to agree. I grew apprehensive about him several years ago, before he and Cathy moved away. He gave a brother-in-law a thick, full color, fully detailed encyclopedia of arms and ammunition. While we were saying the dinner prayer, I engage in my usual blotting out of the "blessing" and interiorization of what I had learned up to that point. One thing is that gun freaks tend to be deeply religious, but if ever there was a non sequitur surely it is giving someone a book about things that kill on the day their silly Christ was born. Another thing is that for guys like Jeff, guns and ammo become an obsession. I have to wonder about people obsessed with guns who also have apocalyptic religious beliefs.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by A. Noni Moose on January 24, 2013 at 8:20am Here's the difference, and you will not find either in a dictionary..Gun Control is the first step to Gun Ban. Duh.
Next, read the news..the proposals are for a BAN of "assault" weapons and "high capacity" magazines. NOT a "control of"..an outright BAN. Maybe you need to consult YOUR dictionary. Look up Control and Ban.
Just another liberal with a knee jerk reaction that thinks they know what is best for ALL people. You are as narrow-minded as the people we all purport to hate..the militant xtians.
As for meeting me? I don't frequent Starbucks and the Apple store, so it is doubtful you'd ever run into me...you can stay with your flock, they will instruct you on how to think. It is amazing that a person such as that is not a christian afterall..
Permalink Reply by James M. Martin on January 22, 2013 at 8:08pm Guns are strange. My Dad caught hell from friends when he traded a .306 for a 30-30 Winchester. They said the .306 was easily the best deer hunting rifle, but Dad said the 30-30 was lighter. When I shot my one and only deer, I proved Dad right. Nobody to this day believes the story but I was straddled between tree branches high above a pasture, and in order to make the shot, I had to twist my torso about almost 180 degrees, reshoulder the 30-30 and resight. I did. It was an eight point buck and I had killed it with an ass shot. Pssst do not tell anyone around here, they will take to callin' me "Ass Shot."
I am very proud of the fact that I have never killed another animal since, and I was in my teens. The host for the shoot was my best friend's Dad, a surgeon who had suffered a stroke and had to take up anesthesiology. Doc seemed p.o.'d that I had killed the only deer, his sons being empty handed at the end of a week-end hunt. I went hunting once after that and was not even tempted. I did it mostly for camaraderie. Everyone had a bottle of Canadian whiskey.
Permalink Reply by Park Bierbower on January 26, 2013 at 6:49pm if fascism ever shows its face in the US it'll likely be enforced by those very same citizens who are 'protecting' themselves from it.
$300.00 isn't that much to drop on amo. I question his reasoning, but not the action. I hope that he rotates his stock. Not doing so could result in damage to equipment or personal injury.
Permalink Reply by Humble Pie on January 22, 2013 at 2:08pm I agree that it wouldn't be under normal circumstances, but when you need that $300 for things like providing a warm place for your kids to sleep at night, it's almost unimaginable. If there were a clear and present threat of violence, maybe, but not other than that.
I agree with you James in that I would be leery of that Jeff guy too. I think it's worrisome that he is obsessed with guns and the end times.
Permalink Reply by John Aultman on January 23, 2013 at 12:35pm What people like Jeff don't realize is that the NRA, ammo and gun manufactures and retailers use the gun control debate to inflate prices on ammunition and guns. After Obama was elected in 2008 ammo prices skyrocketed (a box of 50, 380 cal bullets was $65 dollars at a local gun shop here in Tennessee) because the NRA President Wayne LaPierre and others said Obama was out to take their guns and restrict the purchase of ammunition which didn't happen. Now it will start again and the ammo, gun manufactures and the retailers will laugh all the way to the bank.
Permalink Reply by James M. Martin on January 23, 2013 at 10:07pm Since the last time I shopped for shells was probably around 1980, I am astonished at how high cartridges are. It's as if they're trying to keep up with cigarettes. But I think there should be a new tax to cover families of victims of gun use and abuse. And if you do not own a gun, you are exempt from the tax. Now that Chief Justice Roberts has said congress can use the taxing clause to justify, e.g. Obamacare (actually the ACA), why not make him put his money where his opinion was.
Permalink Reply by Jim DePaulo on February 5, 2013 at 1:04pm
Permalink Reply by James M. Martin on February 5, 2013 at 6:34pm Jim, you naughty boy!
Permalink Reply by Jim DePaulo on February 7, 2013 at 3:42pm I've spent my life refining my naughtiness.
Permalink Reply by Secular Forces 2013 on February 9, 2013 at 7:15am if only pot and prostitution were legal.. there'd be less of xyz gun nutting.. haaaa whaaaa

Harry M Woodruff Online

Summer Brashear Online

Dominic Florio Online

harry m woodruff Online

Sentient Biped Online


Richard Haynes Online



Loren Miller Online

Two Cult Survivor Online
Posted by Larry Taylor on May 20, 2013 at 8:15pm 6 Comments 1 Like
OK. I am venting. My mother died two weeks ago. She was a “god fearing christian.” Before her death she refused all medical treatment. She wanted to be left alone. She even refused to speak with my brother who is a methodist minister. He is a pip, let me tell you! I suspect she did not believe, but a woman born in her time could not and did not state her actual beliefs. This is the opening salvo to all christians; FUCK YOU! I had so many people come and tell…
ContinuePosted by Christy Stewart on May 20, 2013 at 2:17pm 6 Comments 0 Likes
This probably should not have shocked me as much as it did (especially since I am in Texas). I actually thought my coworkers were playing a joke on me because they know I am an atheist. Sadly, this was no joke. This actually happened.
I work in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who admit patients are general MDs. (Psychiatrists see patients after admission) Yesterday evening we received several calls from irate parents. A new doctor who was doing admissions yesterday actually…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 1:09pm 3 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this,
Nathan Young,
No Jason Torpy it is you that should be banned for promoting atheism, a belief that has no foundation in reality and zero proof behind it. The letter was a mockery of your atheist beliefs. I request to the board here that they remove Jason for his unverifiable beliefs in atheism for which he has no proof other than his arrogance. The letter was a mockery of atheism. Atheism is stupid and it should be mocked and it…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 12:42pm 4 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this Facebook comment?
Nathan Young to Jason Torpy,
for once you and I can agree on something. We should disrespect beliefs that are untenable such as the belief that there is no God. Indeed for me to respect you Jason, I cannot respect your belief in non-belief in atheism. Your atheism comes across as arrogrance, smugness, and self righteous. Indeed after reading "An Open Letter to My Religious Friends" I penned one…
Continue© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.