"Michael Newdow, an atheist, was offended by the phrase "In God We Trust" on the coins of American currency, believing that the phrase was a state-sponsored statement of religious faith - illegal under the separation of church and state.[15] He argued that he had a right to raise his daughter "without God being imposed into her life by her schoolteachers."[16]
Some of the judges in the 2002 ruling agreed that Newdow had a right to direct the religious education of his daughter.[17] Newdow explained his view of 'freedom of religious exercise' by asking whether Christians would be glad if the atheists were in the majority and if the atheists inserted into the pledge of allegiance the phrase "one nation under NO God."[16] In an interview with Connie Chung, Newdow stated, "The Constitution says the congress will make no laws respecting an establishment of religion which means that the Supreme Court says, and as you have said, nobody should be made to feel like an outsider. And I would only ask everyone of those people to ask themselves, if they had to say every morning when they pledged allegiance to the flag, that we were one nation under Sun Myung Moon, or one nation under David Koresh, or one nation under Jesus, or one nation under Mohammad, how would they feel?"
Thus Newdow claimed that the reference to God is meaningful, and hence the court should recognize, and correct, the resulting religious bias. Meanwhile, the "under God" clause is often defended as "ceremonial deism," acceptable because it is religiously meaningless."
I read this and thought Newdow was right on the money. We should definately take "God" out of the Pledge.
Tags: allegiance, atheist, god, government, of, pledge
Permalink Reply by matt warren on May 30, 2012 at 12:56pm I try to never get myself into a situation that "demands" this kind of mind control (repeating a "pledge" to anything is relinquishing your own thoughts and preferenses to another).
when it does come up I usually, at that place insert very loudley "one nation..UNDER LAW..."
no one can argue with that, at least no one screws with me for it.
Permalink Reply by Jim DePaulo on June 1, 2012 at 9:12am I use the "under law" as well. I also told my grand kids to use it as they have to mouth the pledge every day (my grand kids are all Atheist).
Permalink Reply by Secular Forces 2013 on June 2, 2012 at 7:29am ha..the reason god's in there is...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Democratic_Party_of_Germany
they (fundies here) hate when 'christian' any party sides w/socialism
Permalink Reply by Tracy A. Finney on June 2, 2012 at 3:39pm
Debra Stevenson replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion Camp Meeting in the group Ex-Adventists and Seventh-day Atheists
Debra Stevenson replied to Athianarchist's discussion So What Made You First Start To Doubt?
Tom Sarbeck replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Tom Sarbeck replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Joan Denoo replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Tom Sarbeck replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
JP Carey replied to JP Carey's discussion Can you stop a hardnose religious person dead in their tracks? in the group Orderism
Joan Denoo replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Joan Denoo replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Tom Sarbeck replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Joan Denoo replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Tony Baldwin replied to Civilly Disobey's discussion Religion vs. Atheism in the Workplace
Ruth Anthony-Gardner added 2 discussions to the group Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Legal assault on EPA in the group Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.