I hear many people argue that ethics would be impossible without there being an objective standard established by god. Does anyone know any good arguements around this?

I don't know why they would assume God=Moral Standard, but I don't have a really good argument against it.

Views: 68

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Will be exploring your site in short order, Bryan.

As for God and ethics: I've come up with what's slowly starting to become my 'sig'. I call it "Greywolf's Dictum". Hope I become obscurely famous for it.

Greywolf's Dictum: There can be no greater evil in the world than the Creator of evil. That's assuming, hypothetically of course, that the creature "God" exists. (May change "the world" to "existence," though.)

Posted at: http://theatheistobserver.wordpress.com

So Christendom needs to flush that image of a "moral" God who is supposed to be love, goodness, and perfection incarnate right down the toilet. If anything, He's evil!
Well, if your goal is to first show that a god is not necessary for morals then I'm surprised that (as far as I know) Euthyphro has only been mentioned once by Ralph McRae.

The core of the argument goes something like this: Is doing good, good because god wants you to do it? Or does does god want you to do it because it is good.

The best thing would be for you to read the Euthyphro argument yourself, but I can't seem to find a copy of it on the internet so i'll try to get it correct here.

If you should do good because god wants you to, then "good" is arbitrary. If god wanted you to rape an murder then doing so would be good. Good could be anything at all.

If someone says that god wouldn't ever want you to do something like that... well why wouldn't god want that? Because it would be evil? Then they are saying that god wants you to do good because it is good. If god wants you to do good because it is good then that means that god doesn't get to decide what is good and what is not but that good is something separate from god.

I'm not sure I made that very clear, but I think it gets the general idea across that God does NOT equate to Moral Standards.

Hope this helps a bit, Sean.

Later days,
Jack

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

Future replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
2 hours ago
Loren Miller replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
2 hours ago
Michael Penn commented on nikki summers's blog post atheist billboard
2 hours ago
Michael Penn replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
2 hours ago
John Jubinsky posted photos
2 hours ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is god good?
3 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
6 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
7 hours ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
7 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
7 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
7 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
7 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service