Republican plans to gerrymander my state and others even more are their main hope to steal the next election from citizens. This outright cheating already keeps them as a majority in the House, enabling a small minority to stop effective government and favor the 1% over everyone else. I mostly hate gerrymandering because it's enabled the Greedy Old Party to push fossil fuels while Climate Destabilization threatens.

How Republicans Plan To Rig The Next Presidential Election, In Six ...

Yesterday, Virginia Republicans took the first step to move a GOP plan to rig the Electoral College forward in that state. Similar plans are under consideration in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.

The Republican election rigging plan targets blue states that President Obama won in 2008 and 2012, and changes the way they allocate electoral votes to give many of these votes away for free to the Republican candidate for president. Under the Republican Plan, most electoral votes will be allocated to the winner of individual Congressional districts, rather than to the winner of the state as a whole. Because the Republican Plan would be implemented in states that are heavily gerrymandered to favor Republicans, the resulting maps would all but guarantee that the Republican would win a majority of each state’s electoral votes, even if the Democratic candidate wins the state as a whole.

Views: 44

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

One would note the pejorative term "gerrymandering" is the term the party out of power uses to call any redistricting by the party in power.

There are numerous gerrymandered Democratic districts. Note for example, Michigan Congressional District 4 (which includes my hometown), which runs from Traverse City diagonally across the state to south of Flint, including Alma, Mt Pleasant, Clare, and nearly half of the rural area of the Lower Peninsula, as well as the suburbs of Saginaw and Flint.

As for the idea of the electoral college votes being divided up by winners of congressional districts rather than winner take all, I would note Maine and Nebraska (my home state now) already do that, and in truth votes wind up not being divided anyway. In Nebraska Omaha and Lincoln are the lion's share of the population and the rest of us are unrepresented even with such division.

My solution would be much simpler: abolish the electoral college. It served its purpose two hundred years ago when travelling to cast votes in the national election was a real chore; in the days of the computer we do not have a democratic-republic when voters whims can be overturned by an elector who is not obligated to vote the way he was elected anyway.

(Not that I "like" these Republican tactics, but this deserves more attention!)

It would be instructive to see the state maps redrawn as cartograms based on population. Our ideal is "one person, one vote" rather than "one acre, one vote".

here's a good article on all this:

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/

we all know most republicans are god fearing christian folk.  isn't cheating a sin?

Matt, remember you can sin if you're an xtian, but just repent and gawd will forgive you.  So they can repent AFTER the next election. UGH.

yeah, nice little system they got there.

thanks for graphic. irony. russia's banned any russian gov types to purchase real estate in USA.. ? 
and banned gay rallies. in public. 
and.. imho that's foreign influence w/the gerryriggn'. loophole city~pffffft

To reform Presidential elections, the National Popular Vote bill, already enacted by eight states and Washington DC, would have states commit their electoral votes to the nationwide winner of the popular vote. This interstate compact would take effect once enough states enact it to account for a majority of the votes in the Electoral College.

The states (and DC) that have enacted it have 132 votes -- it's just about halfway to taking effect!

There is a potential problem with the national popular vote if there is a close, contested race (as in 2000).  In such a case, the entire nation would be subject to recounts, even states that had a clear majority, because ANY votes picked up there could go against the contested vote. Not necessarily a fatal problem, but I could see it creating huge extended squabbles every election.

One result of the state based electorals, is that states where there is no serious challenge are not involved in subsequent litigation.

RSS

CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS

Latest Activity

Loren Miller replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Pope Francis says even Atheists go to Heaven
"Hmmm, an outreach to atheists from the pope?  I wonder ... is this an attempt at engagement and maybe a dialogue ... or is it an act of desperation from an organization which may finally be recognizing that it is failing at both engagement and…"
1 minute ago
Karim R. joined Darrel Ray's group
Thumbnail

Recovering from Religion

Unless you were raised by atheist parents, you probably had some recovering to do when you left religion. The purpose of RR is to provide a landing place for people when they jump from religion. With local support groups throughout the US, Canada, UK, and Australia, and real-time resources accessible to everyone, RR is where to turn when faith has lost its luster.See More
4 minutes ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Methane, more scary than we thought in the group Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists
"In addition to the methane spike over Antarctica there was Is the permafrost's integrity breaking down? In sum, the half-life of methane in the atmosphere depends upon available hydroxyl ions to break it down. The oft cited values of methane…"
8 minutes ago
Easton Le commented on Randall Smith's blog post The Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming
"Hello, Randall. Did you move to the region or have you lived there your entire life? I'm just curious because even my friends in the military who weren't rednecks and grew up in the region still loved motorcycles and racing. They…"
8 minutes ago
Sentient Biped commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
"Rainy for several days now.  Down into the 40s.  Not much ambition. Some of the irises look nice, anyway. "
10 minutes ago
Sentient Biped commented on Sentient Biped's group Getting Religion
"Here is a neolithic stele from around 2,500 BC in Montagnac, France. I could not find much info about the stele - here is one link. "
18 minutes ago
Karim R. replied to matthew greenberg's discussion YES!!!! Wolf Blitzer asked the wrong person if she thanked the Lord....
"oh. that wasn't there when I posted. but yes, I totally agree with you."
27 minutes ago
Sentient Biped replied to Loren Miller's discussion Latest Activity?
"It's a nice crisp format.  Very sharp!  Shows up well on my computer and on my ipad mini.   Thank you Richard for making the changes work so well!"
29 minutes ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service