You are correct, they trying to derail the train that is about to pass through their unstable base. The fear of falling from such hieghts must be terrorifing for them. Their strenght in numbers is dewindling and the voice that use to be well recieved is now falling on ears that have been alerted to their motivation of power prestage wealth and most importantly their insanity.
I'm no fake! There sure are a few indeed! Holy scriptures and debates over creation? whipe they arse w/it. We got the Constitution to uphold! 2012
Relentless, just like their bigoted corruptions through faith-fraud!
If there is a question about morals, it is the question of how responsible and considerate a person treats another person. With respect and appreciation as a valued partner or as a body to be used. Reciprocally respecting and responsible partners can be homo or hetero. Abusive degrading another by promisuity can also be done between homos and between heteros.
I have much more sympathy for monogamous homosexual couples than I have for promiscuous heterosexual males behaving like dogs in the gutter.
You have left out monogamous heterosexuals. They constitute the largest portion of the society and it would be interesting to know, in your own words, what you think of them.
(I am one of tthose monogamous heterosexuals, so I am interested)
Madhukar, you have misunderstood the gist of my posting. This was a reply to people discriminating against homosexuality. I was only saying, that all monogamy, even when it is homosexual, is more considerate and responsible than is any form of promiscuity. My point is that only the consideration for others' feelings by monogamy is important, not the question, if the respected partner is of the same or other gender.
I think that we should undertake to define all attributes of atheism, by mutual consent. Mrerely not believing in god may not make a complete atheist. This is what appears from a few comments.
Of course they may have been sent here by Dembski of "The Discovery Institute" think I'm joking then follow the link below
Then this message appears at RD.net 2 days ago on a thread last active in 2006, please note the reference to "homework" in the message
I think some instructions need to be displayed on every discussion page. I first suggest is that there should be no personal attacs and second is that there should not be any attempts to create controversies due to personal grudges.
once again you indulge yourself with the argument from personal incredulity which amounts to "I don't believe it happens so it did'nt so there" I refer you to my post on page 7 of this discussion, Back to the drawing board for you little boy
atheist are always polite
just like me :-P