Eve and the Tree of Knowledge... Why are people not on her side?

This has been on my mind lately, hence my username.  This is my understanding of Eve's part in the creationist story: [just to say it, I know it's fake, I'm just wondering how people could be on "God"s side.]

God told Adam and Eve not to eat fruit off the Tree of Knowledge.  One day, a serpent told Eve that God was lying, she'd become more enlightened [or something along those lines] if she ate it.  So like anyone else, Eve ate one, and gave one to Adam.  They realized they were naked [that's just stupid.  What kind of person doesn't realize they're naked?] and got leaves to cover themselves, etc.  God kicked them out and punished Eve by making childbirth more painful than before.

 

???????? To me it looks like Eve was right and God was wrong here.  Why is Eve so often shown in a negative light for what she did????

Tags: adam, creation, creationist, eve, fruit, knowledge, of, story, tree, why

Views: 292

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Lots of interesting takes on the whole Garden of Eden myth.  I've always taken it as a metaphorical fable that portrayed the beginning of morality in the mind of human kind.  Until Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the tree they had no concept of good and evil.  No shame, no guilt, no regrets just ignorant bliss.  Nothing was wrong so everything was right.  Truly a garden of Eden.  Then they eat from the tree, realize they are naked and it's off to the races.

Always seemed pretty simple to me although so many different meanings have been attributed to this story that I don't even try to keep 'em straight any more.

It's also the tale that started me on the road to atheism so I guess it will always occupy a special place in my heart.

I have always hated that fairytail myth ... It's been thrown in my face more than I can remember. So glad I left the xtain belief system.

men wrote the story, men told the story, and the woman usually gets the short end of the stick.  What a nice 'god' to punish ALL women for Eve's (fake) mistake.

I'm surprised no one has jumped on the obvious contradiction.

Without any knowledge of good/evil, how could either proto-theist be held responsible for disobeying fictional sky-being's stupid rule in the first place? Without this knowledge there is no free will, as they couldn't know that not obeying was evil.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Fuckin' book starts off with nothing but plot holes…. stupid book.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

Michael Penn replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Enough already - take down the Brother Richard article from the banner
13 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The cost of masculine crime
23 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to Joe's discussion The Psychological Benefits of Being a Atheist
24 minutes ago
Pat replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Enough already - take down the Brother Richard article from the banner
27 minutes ago
Pat replied to Joe's discussion Atheist TV Officially Launches; David Silverman Criticizes History Channel for Presenting Bible as History in the group Atheist News
34 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to Sentient Biped's discussion More than 30,000 Nexus members. Where are they?
38 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The cost of masculine crime
46 minutes ago
Richard C Brown joined Blair Scott's group
47 minutes ago
Ceil replied to Ceil's discussion Please help me maintain some sanity... It just isn't true!
56 minutes ago
Joe posted a discussion
1 hour ago
Joe added a discussion to the group Atheist News
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo posted discussions
1 hour ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service