This has been on my mind lately, hence my username. This is my understanding of Eve's part in the creationist story: [just to say it, I know it's fake, I'm just wondering how people could be on "God"s side.]
God told Adam and Eve not to eat fruit off the Tree of Knowledge. One day, a serpent told Eve that God was lying, she'd become more enlightened [or something along those lines] if she ate it. So like anyone else, Eve ate one, and gave one to Adam. They realized they were naked [that's just stupid. What kind of person doesn't realize they're naked?] and got leaves to cover themselves, etc. God kicked them out and punished Eve by making childbirth more painful than before.
???????? To me it looks like Eve was right and God was wrong here. Why is Eve so often shown in a negative light for what she did????
Tags: adam, creation, creationist, eve, fruit, knowledge, of, story, tree, why
Permalink Reply by Russell Christian on March 10, 2012 at 10:26pm Lots of interesting takes on the whole Garden of Eden myth. I've always taken it as a metaphorical fable that portrayed the beginning of morality in the mind of human kind. Until Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the tree they had no concept of good and evil. No shame, no guilt, no regrets just ignorant bliss. Nothing was wrong so everything was right. Truly a garden of Eden. Then they eat from the tree, realize they are naked and it's off to the races.
Always seemed pretty simple to me although so many different meanings have been attributed to this story that I don't even try to keep 'em straight any more.
It's also the tale that started me on the road to atheism so I guess it will always occupy a special place in my heart.
I have always hated that fairytail myth ... It's been thrown in my face more than I can remember. So glad I left the xtain belief system.
Permalink Reply by booklover on March 11, 2012 at 7:53am men wrote the story, men told the story, and the woman usually gets the short end of the stick. What a nice 'god' to punish ALL women for Eve's (fake) mistake.
Permalink Reply by Richard ∑wald on March 13, 2012 at 5:52am I'm surprised no one has jumped on the obvious contradiction.
Without any knowledge of good/evil, how could either proto-theist be held responsible for disobeying fictional sky-being's stupid rule in the first place? Without this knowledge there is no free will, as they couldn't know that not obeying was evil.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
Fuckin' book starts off with nothing but plot holes…. stupid book.
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Climate hits 400ppm of CO2 for first time in 3 million years in the group Climate Concerns
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Steph S.'s discussion 9 threatened animals of the Southeast in the group Wildlife
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Steph S.'s discussion 10 of the cutest endangered species in the group Wildlife
Meri Weathers liked Steph S.'s discussion Science’s Brilliant Blunders: How Oops Moments Became Eurekas
Emerald Dove liked John Hutcheson's discussion Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, Who's playing?
Joan Denoo commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Anti-atheist post from an Orthdox Mormon
Emerald Dove replied to John Hutcheson's discussion Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, Who's playing?
Joseph P replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Making miscarriage a crime in the group Feminist Atheists
Joan Denoo replied to James M. Martin's discussion Breitbart Group Claims "New Evidence" Hitler Was Gay in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature in the group Climate Concerns
Loren Miller commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Anti-atheist post from an Orthdox Mormon© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.