One facet of non-belief still leaves me puzzled. No one has discussed this before, at least I have not seen it. The two terrifying aspects of the universe. What if there is absolutely no end to it, the other being, what if there IS an end. I find no problem wrapping my mind around there is no Theist God, all the evidence is there. But how can we, at our un-evolved state, grasp the immensity of a non-ending, or ending universe without clinging to inbred superstitious awe of some immense other power or force. I wldome your comments and advice.

Views: 19

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I have no idea what you mean. I find it totally easy to understand that something is finite without any superstition. My life and the heat life of the universe, ending in my death and the heat death of the universe respectively, are finite,and I understand that just fine without superstitions.
I wonder what it is that is terrifying?
If it is infinite, then that is gorgeous! If it is finite, it is so vast in comparison to us, that it may well never be fully seen or explored by humans. Perhaps your brain is seeing the many beautiful possibilities?
I find no terror, unrest or inbred superstitious awe in the either infinite or the finite universe...or multiverse should that hypothesis play out. The fear of the unknown is part of reason we have make believe deities in the first place. FOD, do we fancy ourselves a "deist"?
Terrifying? Shirley you jest? For us, here and now it is, at best, a philosophical question. The universe may end - somehow, or it may continue - in some form, forever. Either way, what possible relavence could it have to beings such as we, whose existence, both individually and as a species, is the merest flicker? If it does end it will only be many billions of years after we have ended.
I think I have stated my thought with the wrong words. I am not a believer in the mystical or god like entities. Lobo made an excellent point, it really does not matter either way to us with our short time here. I just was pondering the concept of traveling for eternity and still having a long way to go. Mind boggling but you are all right "not terrifying". I thank you for you comments, but most of all, am thankful that we have the Nexus to allow us to express ourselves. thanks all
"The two terrifying aspects of the universe. What if there is absolutely no end to it, the other being, what if there IS an end. "

Why? do you feel you would fly off forever? or possibly your second option is smacking into a wall or falling off the edge? I don't want to make light of your concern, but personally I don't think about the Universe much.

I do think about my local environment & how we are having fish and bird die offs in our lakes, and the fact that the tent catepillars have eaten the leaves from hundreds of acres of our forests locally (literally!) the universe is the least of my worries, but hey thats just me.

As far as being un-evolved I think some might evolve to survive the toxic environment we have created in the past 150 years and I need no "inbred superstitious awe" to appreciate the beauty of a storm or the changing seasons or appreciating the fact that occasionally I get to see the northern lights.

Be good, be kind and enjoy the moment, thats really all we have.
Methis, wow, you have me boggled, and thats good. You express the very complicated in an understandable way. of course!! you're a teacher.
Amer, this in fact was my first question, then a very wise Atheist suggested, "who cares", I share his belief (pardon the pun) that with our lowly evolved brains, we are trying to sove the mystery of existance with a 3 megabite mind, when we need a billion terrabite one or more. Be satisfied that the idea of a celestial dictator is rediculous and enjoy the life you have, free from fear, superstition and stress. Go to You Tube and watch 8 or 10 Christopher Hitchens videos, that will help a lot. good luck and thank you for responding
Christopher Hitchens is one of our leading intelligentsia, who's views of both religion and the universe are great fun to watch. He, by the way, also wrote the (millions sold) best seller "God is Not Great" "Religion poisons everything" I just thought you might find him interesting.......dear
On the end-ability of the Universe I cannot comment much. I only know what I have read and not much more.

On the horror of either outcome, I can share an opinion. For me, I have the same Epicurean response that I have to my own unavoidable end: that it does me no good to fear it because whatever the result, it will happen and I have no power over it; what's more when it does happen (or doesn't as the case may be) I will no longer be around to experience the 'end' so worry isn't merited.

There are several theories on how it will all end:
If there is no end, the Universe will approach absolute zero long after all of the stars have collapsed, after the planets have fallen out of orbit. All matter will be consumed by black holes that will then dissipate their energy into the Universe as photons and all that will be left of all of this is discrete, low energy photons.

The other theory is the Membrane Theory where, when two universe membranes collide, there will be another big bang event that restarts the cycle. As for the contribution of the Membrane Theory to the "end or no end" discussion, it's a bit of a non-starter as one must then ask whether or not the membranous system will end or not.

Truly fascinating, but not anything to fret about. :)
Does awe need to be connected to superstition?

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
11 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
11 minutes ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
13 minutes ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
16 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
19 minutes ago
Tom Sarbeck commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is god good?
38 minutes ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
1 hour ago
Jason Blair replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
1 hour ago
Jason Blair replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
1 hour ago
Jason Blair replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
1 hour ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
1 hour ago
Patricia replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
1 hour ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service