This morning I began the process of filing my annual tax return. While doing so a recurring thought came to mind. In my few days on this site I’ve gained a great deal of appreciation for the intellect of those on the site so I decided to share my controversial thought and see what some of you think of it. 

 

I believe that our government should eliminate the child tax credit (credit). In my opinion, our government has, for decades, been incentivizing bad choices when it comes to the decision to have a child or not. Given the extraordinary moral and economic costs to our society that usually results from someone choosing to have a child they cannot care for without government assistance I personally believe that government needs to stop making it easier for people to have children. If a person really needs the credit to support their child they should not have had that child in the first place.

 

Unfortunately, raising a child is much more of an expense than many people acknowledge when they decide to have one. I have no idea if eliminating the credit would influence people’s decision-making process, but I think it’s worth a try. In some states more than half of all births are paid for by Medicaid. Eliminating Medicaid and SCHIP would only serve to punish innocent children. So, I’m proposing to eliminate the credit in hopes that doing so will make people think before they have children that will become the taxpayer’s financial responsibility.  

Views: 296

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think that is a good idea, probably not popular with the masses however.

You think that young lust will be deterred if there is no Child Tax Credit?

You think Religious Fanatics will stop having 8-19 children if it were abolished?

Somehow I doubt it.

What it will do is take an extra 1000 out of my pocket.

I admit when I first learned I was pregnant with my last child, I did not think far enough ahead.

I did not plan for the contingency that gas would be 200% higher in 11 short years,

or

(Despite the perfect teeth in both our families), She would require braces,

or

Healthcare costs would jump 150%, while pay raises remain at 3%

or

That her father's employer would sell a very lucrative business and "downsize" all current employees.

I should have thought about all this I know

but the only thing I could think about was seeing his blues in another beautiful human being..

And the payoff of an extra 1000 bucks a year in my child tax credit.

Greed-It's the New American Way

I am saying your "hope" is in vain.

So, I’m proposing to eliminate the credit in hopes that doing so will make people think before they have children that will become the taxpayer’s financial responsibility. 

I am not saying it is fair. That is a different issue.

An issue I probably would NOT have commented on

(White flag)

I do not use public beaches, but my taxes pay for it.

I do not go to college, but my taxes susidize it.

I have never used Amtrak

Never been on an airplane

Never grown corn, sugar or any other crop that gets US subsidies

I will never be able to afford to own a car that uses ethanol.

My taxes pay for these things, in one way or another and I am OK with it.

It's not fair, to me, but I believe it makes me a good citizen AND I might use these services..sometime.

But it could just be the Bleeding Heart Liberal Socialist in me :)

Peggy makes good points. I am in favor of simplifying the tax code but I would add these arguments in opposition to your proposal:

1. These children will end up paying taxes eventually that will finance everyone's social services including those with no children.

2. Who takes care of the elderly with no children?  Other people's children. 

3. The proven way to lower the birth rate among the poor is education.  

4. I have never met anyone for which the tax credit was a consideration in the decision to become a parent. 

5. Low income populations have less money to tax so the tax credit has little or no impact. 

6. The birth rate in the US is decreasing as it is.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/births_june_2011/births_june_20...

+1 for this and your previous comment. 

Flattery will get you everywhere.  I come from an occult background that had me believing at one point that the deity worshiped by Christians and Jews was the Gnostic Ialdabaoth.  It was easy for me to believe in this.  I looked around me and saw such abject misery in the world no good omnipotent God would be so tyrannical and, well, downright evil in creating it.  The antinomian Gnostics -- Cainites, Ophites, for example -- thought that the Bible should be turned on its head.  Thus, Cain was far superior to Abel because Abel could never have murdered and was God's favorite of the two. Knowledge of one's capacity for murder makes non-believers more moral than those who fear God but murder all the same, then apologize to God to get into God's "Kingdom."  That this scenario is so holey with fallacies it leaks like a sieve need not be pointed out to those like us who swim against the tide. 

All of the Gnostic sects believed that bringing a child into a world of evil, a world where matter itself was infused with evil, was itself the most evil act a couple could commit.  If I were to return to Christeranity tomorrow, I would found a Church of Judas.  Judas of Kerioth is the perfect Gnostic saint.  Then, again, I recall the bombings in Birmingham in the last century....

I get what you're saying, but I don't think it will stop people.  On a side-note, our son turned 17 last summer and we were unable to get the child tax credit for him.  Why?  Wasn't he still a dependent since he was not considered an adult yet? It didn't cost us any less to raise him last year.  Not complaining, just wondering who made that rule up.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

Pat replied to Loren Miller's discussion Turns out that lawsuits have rules (Daily Kos) in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
28 minutes ago
Atheist in FundyLand replied to Atheist in FundyLand's discussion Anyone else have trouble finding a compatible psychotherapist?
33 minutes ago
Larry replied to Larry's discussion YouTube Video: "How to Convert an Atheist"
34 minutes ago
Atheist in FundyLand replied to Atheist in FundyLand's discussion Anyone else have trouble finding a compatible psychotherapist?
35 minutes ago
Atheist in FundyLand replied to Atheist in FundyLand's discussion Anyone else have trouble finding a compatible psychotherapist?
37 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to Loren Miller's discussion Turns out that lawsuits have rules (Daily Kos) in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
40 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to Loren Miller's discussion Turns out that lawsuits have rules (Daily Kos) in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
40 minutes ago
John Jubinsky replied to John Jubinsky's discussion Experimental Ebola Serum May Be In Use On Americans in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
45 minutes ago
James M. Martin replied to Loren Miller's discussion Turns out that lawsuits have rules (Daily Kos) in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
58 minutes ago
James M. Martin replied to John Jubinsky's discussion Experimental Ebola Serum May Be In Use On Americans in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
1 hour ago
Pat commented on Sentient Biped's group Food!
1 hour ago
Matt--Lukin replied to L. Alcorn's discussion Early Christianity
1 hour ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service