I think that religion didn't cause anything good but only start wars, create gilt , hold science back , repressing women's rights, repress sexual subjects , promotes violence racism sectrianism backwardness discrimination ignorance , violates human rights , opression of homosexuals , bigotry , hatred , extremism , terrorism . But sometimes it helps people cope with their problems. I want to hear your opinions and arguments. Plus excuse my English since it's a second language.
PS : I meant abolish not by forcing but using logic and reason.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Anthony Jordan on March 30, 2013 at 6:38pm I would not mind religion per se if believers would leave it a private matter and not try, sometimes vigorously, to spread their delusion to others. Christians, for example, are mandated (supposedly) by Jesus to spread the gospel everywhere, and they believe that gives them the right to go knocking door-to-door to spread the good news. Religion in America and in Islamic countries is also having a detrimental effect on politics that effects not only every American, but the whole world.
Permalink Reply by Ibrahim on November 2, 2012 at 3:16pm I forgot to mention that we can only abolish religion by using logic and reason like now for example. I agree with you Napolean I say that we can still celebrate these holidays as secular . Remember that Stalin abolished religion to become a god like figure. To me I think that people should say whatever they like , to write whatever they want , to believe in anything within reason.
Permalink Reply by Mathew T. on November 2, 2012 at 11:35pm In this case, absolutely haha
....might be wishful thinking, though? Any neuroscientists or anthropologists on here who would argue that some minds/people groups may actually require religion (or a belief in life after death) to function, and get function, out of this life? I'm aware of how condescending this sounds to theists, but I would be lying if I said I hadn't considered this a number of times myself....
Permalink Reply by Jim Schultz on November 11, 2012 at 9:12am Sorry. I added my reply today, before I had read all the responses. You do more clearly define what you mean by "abolish" here. I would still recommend chosing a different word, as this one has too many meanings.
Permalink Reply by ryan leman on November 2, 2012 at 3:17pm
Permalink Reply by Jim Schultz on November 11, 2012 at 9:14am Well stated
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on November 11, 2012 at 12:52pm I like your response.
Permalink Reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on November 2, 2012 at 4:19pm If by abolish you mean outlawed, that didn't work in Communist countries very well. It's a bit like trying to abolish poor judgment.
Permalink Reply by Ibrahim on November 3, 2012 at 12:28pm I agree with you Ruth. But abolishing it by using logic and reason.
Permalink Reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on November 8, 2012 at 10:05pm That's different.
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on November 11, 2012 at 12:56pm Trying to use logic and reason with someone whose mind has been bound by ancient stories that may or may not have happened, and who believes there is some force planning for us, guiding us, answering prayers is delusional thinking. Is one ever successful in logically and reasonably discussing anything with someone who believes in delusions? I haven't found it so.
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on January 18, 2013 at 1:33am Outside the sciences and mathematics, have logic and reason ever defeated emotion?
Emotion can trump science. I'm recalling the guy who about a century ago assembled a dino with the wrong skull and insisted he'd used the correct skull. Ego can be found in lots of places.
Descartes claimed "I think therefore I am."
He didn't feel; he only half was.
Pat replied to John Hutcheson's discussion Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, Who's playing?
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.